Manosphere Wiz The Wizard Lolcow

"because I don't want to,"
Precisely.

why don't you want to accomplish anything?
You know the answer already. There is simply no need [for me] to accomplish anything. Why must one accomplish something in his life?
For me, life is about enjoying -- not about accomplishing something.
 
Precisely.


You know the answer already. There is simply no need [for me] to accomplish anything. Why must one accomplish something in his life?
For me, life is about enjoying -- not about accomplishing something.
So you think that despite the massive talents you presumably have, it's better to not do anything with them? I would say that if a person is truly superior, they would gain enjoyment from bettering the lives of others. I would even say that it is impossible by definition for a person to be superior if they completely lack any sense of ambition. Your argument sounds remarkably like that of someone who is completely useless but has delusions of grandeur, to the point where the two are completely indistinguishable.
 
That wasn't a complaint. It's was an observation of how pathetic you are.
Everybody who does his best, "tries hard", is pathetic?

So you think that despite the massive talents you presumably have, it's better to not do anything with them?
Yes, spot on, once again: that's exactly what I think.
If I don't enjoy making use of my talents, then why do so? It's as simple as that.

I would say that if a person is truly superior, they would gain enjoyment from bettering the lives of others
Altruistic means superior? Interesting.

I would even say that it is impossible by definition for a person to be superior if they completely lack any sense of ambition.
Being superior, simply means being "better" than others (usually genetically), it has nothing to do with ambition.

Your argument sounds remarkably like that of someone who is completely useless but has delusions of grandeur, to the point where the two are completely indistinguishable.
If you say so.

grasp for philosophy

:spudking:

literally everyone
As opposed to "figuratively everyone"?
 
Back