Wizardchan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Welp, enough about me. I'm a loser and should just stop.

I will no longer divert your attention away from shitting on wizardchan's antics. I bid you all a farewell.

Good night!
 
wizard_diplomat said:
Welp, enough about me. I'm a loser and should just stop.

I will no longer divert your attention away from shitting on wizardchan's antics. I bid you all a farewell.

Good night!

Most intelligent thing you've said all night. Come back when you feel the need to contradict yourself again!
 
wizard_diplomat said:
Saney said:
Wizard, how well did you actually know Sarah? Did you talk to her? Hang out with her?

We were in several classes together. One day (sophomore year), on the first day of a class, I was sitting way in the back and wudntuknoit she sat in the back too RIGHT NEXT TO ME. She asked what the date was or what the teacher's name was or something, I forgot. She probably sat because she remembered me from a former class

The first class we had together (freshman year) I would always sit in the back. Sometimes she would sit in front of me. Her hair long and mesmerizing. One day I was walking towards a seat in the back and I looked in her eyes and she looked back. She tilted her head with a very feminine, sly smile on her face and did this kind of subtle wiggle in her seat (very feminine). These were all IOIs. But I was too pussy to talk to her. Fuck me. But I think it was the right thing to have done. It would have been awkward and a disaster if I had tried.

Back to sophomore class. It was the first day and for some reason the teacher wanted to test the class' knowledge out. He singled her out and asked HER a question to "guage the class's knowledge" (WHO DOES THINGS LIKE THAT?) . She gave an answer and the teacher responded very rudely saying something to the effect that they taught her wrong in whatever class she came from. She was embarrassed, I know it. But I didn't say squat to console her b/c I'm a pussy. But guess who was setting to her left (while I was to her right)? Mr. Suave' Chad "Confidence" Thundercock. He said something and she chuckled.. From then on she wouldn't sit in the back, but I did. It's funny, I would find myself accidentally staring at her and she would turn around and catch me as if she had intuition telling her a creep was staring.

I had several more classes with her but no interactions. Saw her on campus...we lived in same unisex dorm my senior year. Once saw her she smiled at me...so maybe she still doesn't hate me...

I THINK I have her email address. I've thought about emailing her anonymously confessing my love and seeing if she could guess who I am.

Friend, I think you're aren't in love with Sarah. I think you're in love with the idea of being in love with this Sarah. From what I've read from that post, you know next to zilch about this girl and only can describe who she is by her appearance.

Also, Don't confess your "love" to her. That's just coming off creepy.
 
He could always just draw a picture of himself finger banging her. That's basically what this infatuation of his was :geek:
 
A-Stump said:
He could always just draw a picture of himself finger banging her. That's basically what this infatuation of his was :geek:

Well, this is just general advice directed to all the wizards and loveshies that lurk the forum.
 
wizard_diplomat said:
Are you implying love? Love doesn't exist. (Info drop #3 now if you include the orgasm bit).

How many men and women say "I love you" after walking the aisle and 2 yrs later are in court and are talking nasty about each other to friends?
Relationships are based off of sexual lust, friendship, money (sharing of resources), ability to trust and depend on other. Take away sexual lust and you just have a friendship or a family member. Love is tenuous. Love is temporary.

My partner and I have been together for thirteen years. We say I love you several times a day and have never missed a day. I can understand if pretending love doesn't exist makes it easier for you to cope with not having it though.
 
I hope this wizard guy took something from his experience here that he can apply in his life that would change him in a positive way.

I also hope for world peace and to win the lottery.
 
wizard_diplomat said:
Saney said:
Wizard, how well did you actually know Sarah? Did you talk to her? Hang out with her?

We were in several classes together. One day (sophomore year), on the first day of a class, I was sitting way in the back and wudntuknoit she sat in the back too RIGHT NEXT TO ME. She asked what the date was or what the teacher's name was or something, I forgot. She probably sat because she remembered me from a former class

The first class we had together (freshman year) I would always sit in the back. Sometimes she would sit in front of me. Her hair long and mesmerizing. One day I was walking towards a seat in the back and I looked in her eyes and she looked back. She tilted her head with a very feminine, sly smile on her face and did this kind of subtle wiggle in her seat (very feminine). These were all IOIs. But I was too pussy to talk to her. Fuck me. But I think it was the right thing to have done. It would have been awkward and a disaster if I had tried.

Back to sophomore class. It was the first day and for some reason the teacher wanted to test the class' knowledge out. He singled her out and asked HER a question to "guage the class's knowledge" (WHO DOES THINGS LIKE THAT?) . She gave an answer and the teacher responded very rudely saying something to the effect that they taught her wrong in whatever class she came from. She was embarrassed, I know it. But I didn't say squat to console her b/c I'm a pussy. But guess who was setting to her left (while I was to her right)? Mr. Suave' Chad "Confidence" Thundercock. He said something and she chuckled.. From then on she wouldn't sit in the back, but I did. It's funny, I would find myself accidentally staring at her and she would turn around and catch me as if she had intuition telling her a creep was staring.

I had several more classes with her but no interactions. Saw her on campus...we lived in same unisex dorm my senior year. Once saw her she smiled at me...so maybe she still doesn't hate me...

I THINK I have her email address. I've thought about emailing her anonymously confessing my love and seeing if she could guess who I am.

is this really the place for this?
 
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

 
Yet Another Wizard said:
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

http://i.imgur.com/TjZxbzi.jpg

And you think that applies to all women?
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

http://i.imgur.com/TjZxbzi.jpg

You do realize that women are people, and that they have separate and distinct personalities from each other. This includes things that they find attractive in a man.
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

http://i.imgur.com/TjZxbzi.jpg

Different women are going to have different personalities and interests from each other. This includes their specific interests in men. That's what makes us human. That's what makes each of us unique. Making blanket statements in an attempt to justify why you're a wizard in the first place isn't going to help anyone involved.
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

http://i.imgur.com/TjZxbzi.jpg

Implying there aren't just as many men who would tell "fat", disabled, or asexual women to hit the bricks?

Source: your own damn board

I once identified as bisexual and I've seen both sides of this coin. Just because women can "get laid whenever they want" doesn't mean that they can't find themselves in a scenario where their only real choices are.....wizards. A lot of people out there are shallow regardless of what's between their legs. Find someone who isn't.
 
I don't think he's going to reply, he's just been lurking for the past few hours. Dissapointing.
 
NIA-DOA 2.0 said:
You do realize that women are people, and that they have separate and distinct personalities from each other. This includes things that they find attractive in a man.
Liquid Squirtle said:
Different women are going to have different personalities and interests from each other. This includes their specific interests in men. That's what makes us human. That's what makes each of us unique. Making blanket statements in an attempt to justify why you're a wizard in the first place isn't going to help anyone involved.
No, all women have the same preferences.
Handsome face, fit, at least 180 cm tall with at least 17 cm long dick (and bed skills).
Only other minor preferences differ, like skin tone or hair colour. But woman will never say, for example: "I like short guys".

Only men have varied preferences. Some prefer short women, some prefer tall. Same thing about weight, you have guys who like anorexic girls and guys who like BBWs. Some men prefer small breasts and some cowtits. etc

It's the same thing with character. There are men who like shy women, outgoing women, childish cute women, serious women, dominating women, but woman wants only outgoing, confident guy with a lot of friends. Even girls who say they are into shy guys really mean they are into soft spoken but ultimately very sociable hipster faggots with a solid group of friends.

KatsuKitty said:
Implying there aren't just as many men who would tell "fat", disabled, or asexual women to hit the bricks?
Source: your own damn board
You either don't browse WC enough or you cover your eyes while scrolling past posts like "I just want a girl who would love me, she can be fat and ugly" And all those shitstorms about fat vs skinny, cowtits vs DFC etc

Hell, I'm one of those guys who want asexual woman.

Just because women can "get laid whenever they want" doesn't mean that they can't find themselves in a scenario where their only real choices are.....wizards.
Not really. Look at this in statistical way. In 18-40 age group, there is more men than women. That means some men will be alone just because there is not enough women. Those are guys who are too much off of those requirements I wrote up there. Those are wizards. Every woman can find someone better than us, he might not look like male model but at least he won't have as ugly mug as many wizards and he won't be a manlet or something.
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
Altissimo said:
I can't watch the video right now because I'm in a library and only looking at this intermittently, but I just wanted to say that, again, all women are different!!! My interests include lots of stuff that I know Chad Thundercocks are not at all into. Pokémon, My Little Pony, the history of video games, music theory, 19th century classical music, bad movies. My second ex and I got along wonderfully because he was into all these things (except music theory due to not being a musician) too!! The only reason he's my ex is due to circumstances out of our control, and I have no doubt we'd still be dating if not for those circumstances.

But here's the thing: I don't want a Chad Thundercock!! If I ever were to date one I have a feeling it would a) end horribly and b) be something that I really didn't want to remember. Honestly if I were to marry a dork that liked all the same things I did I don't think I could ever be unsatisfied. Partially because sex doesn't matter to me very much and partially because what I want in a partner is someone with whom I can dork about dorky things and who is actually a feminist. (For me, the gender or sex of the partner wouldn't even matter!) I know it's easy enough to say it's because I'm young and haven't really had a chance to do a whole lot of things yet, but if I managed to go through That Hormonal Period not wanting anything, I think it's safe to say that that's not going to change easily.

Which, funnily enough, I think would make a Chad Thundercock avoid me! And I'm fine with that.
You are saying that just because no alpha was interested in you yet.

http://i.imgur.com/TjZxbzi.jpg

Seriously? You know, there's more than just physical attraction that comes into a relationship. I might see a girl that turns me into a cartoon wolf howling at the moon, but if there's no chemistry, it's not going anywhere. Most of the women I've met are the same way. Sure, they'll drool over Mark Megadong's chiseled body, but if all he ever talks about is sports, keg stands, and Call of Duty, he's not landing anything more serious than a one night stand.
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
No, all women have the same preferences.

Your ignorant generalization renders the rest of your argument moot.
 
I want to argue, I really do, but it's simply not going to work, and I can't waste my time with someone whose opinion is static anyway.

The only thing I can hope to say that would make sense is I know myself better than any wizard does. If you ever met my second ex I'd think you'd find he is absolutely not a Chad.

also thank you friends for standing up for me :heart-full:
 
Yet Another Wizard said:
No, all women have the same preferences.

I wrote out this big response, but then I realized it was pointless. You're not going to listen to anything we have to say.

You're right in one aspect. Women all have one preference in common; they don't want children. You're acting like a child, plugging his ears, stomping his feet, and yelling, "NO YOU'RE WRONG I'M RIGHT!!!" You sound like a wangsty middle school kid who's jealous of his friend making out with the school slut. "Well, Billy only got kissed because all the girls here are stupid and shallow! All they want is a tall handsome guy! They don't care about personality or anything guys care about!"

No woman is going to want to give you anything other than the rejection hotline with that kind of attitude. Get some help and man up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back