Wizardchan

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know why they're so paranoid about the NSA and Facebook and stuff like that.

They all have huge stashes of kiddy porn and they're worried the government is going to bust them and send them to pound you in the ass federal prison.

And they're probably right.
 
TastyWB 2.0 said:
Of course, Knuckles is way more awesome than SANIC.

hqdefault.jpg

You just had to frickin go there didn't you, ya frick.
 
They say it's okay to express disgust for pedophiles (not child molesters, but pedophiles who don't act on it), but why is that okay?

Why is it okay to shun and express disgust for someone for having a psychiatric disorder? Someone who probably suffers because of it? All they do is making him feel worse.
There are many pedophiles who were driven into suicide because they couldn't deal with it anymore and because they were too afraid to go to a therapist to get treated, because society hates and demonizes pedophiles, even if they never hurt anyone.


I'm not even a pedo by the way.

Oh they have never hurt anyone, try telling that to the victims and their families.

Seriously fuck these people with a rusty metal pole.
 
What these people don't realize is that associating with a website that harbors admitted pedophiles is being part of the problem. It sure as hell isn't helping pedophiles to give them access to child porn, it doesn't matter if it's drawn or written or actual photographs, it doesn't help them. And it doesn't help your case when you provide a haven for people who want to fuck children.
 
PvtRichardCranium said:
I know why they're so paranoid about the NSA and Facebook and stuff like that.

They all have huge stashes of kiddy porn and they're worried the government is going to bust them and send them to pound you in the ass federal prison.

And they're probably right.

There was a guy who was posting about how glad he was about having his lolicon porno. Seriously, it's creepy as hell.

Also:

They say it's okay to express disgust for pedophiles (not child molesters, but pedophiles who don't act on it), but why is that okay?

Why is it okay to shun and express disgust for someone for having a psychiatric disorder? Someone who probably suffers because of it? All they do is making him feel worse.
There are many pedophiles who were driven into suicide because they couldn't deal with it anymore and because they were too afraid to go to a therapist to get treated, because society hates and demonizes pedophiles, even if they never hurt anyone.

You gotta love how they're just ignoring those big posts Himawari and I made where we're basically agreeing with them on this subject. So many of them just seem blindly hostile towards any kind of outside element. They're like prey animals, terrified of anything unfamiliar because it might be a predator.
 
entertainment its not like they can do something its against our rules and against their rules

our community is closely knitted we will be fine

An anonymous board is a close nit community

bob-esponja-ok.gif
 
Dr. Cuddlebug said:
entertainment its not like they can do something its against our rules and against their rules

our community is closely knitted we will be fine

An anonymous board is a close nit community

Very close knit. Like when they turn on members for being normal or not being virgins.
 
TastyWB 2.0 said:
They say it's okay to express disgust for pedophiles (not child molesters, but pedophiles who don't act on it), but why is that okay?

Why is it okay to shun and express disgust for someone for having a psychiatric disorder? Someone who probably suffers because of it? All they do is making him feel worse.
There are many pedophiles who were driven into suicide because they couldn't deal with it anymore and because they were too afraid to go to a therapist to get treated, because society hates and demonizes pedophiles, even if they never hurt anyone.


I'm not even a pedo by the way.

Oh they have never hurt anyone, try telling that to the victims and their families.

Seriously fuck these people with a rusty metal pole.
idk, he kind of has a point (assuming "he" because Wizardchan). Something interesting to think about. Why do I have the right to express disgust for a pedophile who is keeping himself in check, when it's the crime of child molestation that I find so repulsive?

I guess it's because just the thought of being sexual with a child is so repulsive to me, especially as someone who worked in child care for years, that just seeing/hearing someone say "I'm a pedophile" would make me feel sick. It's not exactly healthy to keep the disgust all bottled up, so I'd need to vent it somewhere. And I suppose that if they're discussing and fantasizing about it in a public forum, then they're perpetuating the idea to others(even if indirectly) that child molestation is okay, when it is not. And likewise, they should be allowed the space to vent that themselves, but I think a more private setting, like a forum locked from all but a trusted few or even with a therapist, would be more appropriate. (You could argue that I should therefore be doing my venting in a private forum too, but, well... Lolcow General USED to be locked, haha.)

I feel no ill-will towards someone who has a psychological disorder and is doing what he can to deal with it responsibly. Sex with a child is never okay, but I can't imagine what kind of suffering someone who is attracted to children but has no desire to hurt a child and restrains themselves appropriately would be experiencing, and I even feel respect for that, I'd say.
 
Saney said:
Very close knit. Like when they turn on members for being normal or not being virgins.

They're always so happy for each other when good things happen, too! Like when their lonely administrator with severe disabilities got a girlfr-oh wait. *yawn*
 
TastyWB 2.0:
>Oh they have never hurt anyone, try telling that the victims and their families.
I specifically mentioned that I'm not talking about child molesters, but about pedophiles who never acted on it.

Defending them is not the way to go either, as it may encourage pedophiles to act on their desires.

EDIT: Himawari, I just read your post and I have to agree, maybe I overreacted to his comments.
 
PvtRichardCranium said:
What these people don't realize is that associating with a website that harbors admitted pedophiles is being part of the problem. It sure as hell isn't helping pedophiles to give them access to child porn, it doesn't matter if it's drawn or written or actual photographs, it doesn't help them. And it doesn't help your case when you provide a haven for people who want to fuck children.

You could make the argument that porn* distracts sick fucks from actually going after children. Its a lesser of two evils thing sure but at least these fuckers are in their parents basement and not in a tree outside a daycare.

edit written or drawn porn containing fictional characters.
 
Child porn, if it depicts real children, is absolutely the same as child molestation and just as reprehensible, in my eyes. If it's anime loli porn or whatever, then that's (relatively*) fine, so long as the artist didn't, like, use real children as models/reference, haha.

*I'm still opposed to even drawn child porn, to an extent, because it can be taken as encouragement for what's depicted to be reenacted in real life. But it's sort of a necessary evil I guess, and decidedly the lesser one.
 
Lets stop giving them so much attention. I'll unlock this thread later.

They thrive off being abnormal. When you tell them they're different or weird or abhorrent, they revel in it.
 
Surtur said:
That thin-skinned?
Actually no, I just didn't see it. Either way it doesn't matter. They joke about how we only talk about a minority of their users while selectively picking out posts of our own that are easy to poke fun at. Watching them trying to defend themselves is pretty entertaining.
 
Null said:
Surtur said:
That thin-skinned?
Actually no, I just didn't see it. Either way it doesn't matter. They joke about how we only talk about a minority of their users while selectively picking out posts of our own that are easy to poke fun at. Watching them trying to defend themselves is pretty entertaining.

Not surprised.
 
Himawari said:
Child porn, if it depicts real children, is absolutely the same as child molestation and just as reprehensible, in my eyes. If it's anime loli porn or whatever, then that's (relatively*) fine, so long as the artist didn't, like, use real children as models/reference, haha.

*I'm still opposed to even drawn child porn, to an extent, because it can be taken as encouragement for what's depicted to be reenacted in real life. But it's sort of a necessary evil I guess, and decidedly the lesser one.

I though that I made a distinction in my post between pornography depicting real children and pornography which dose not and by the time I noticed it the thread had been locked.
 
No worries, I figured that was what you meant, I just wanted to make the distinction clear for anyone else. :)
 
Null said:
Surtur said:
That thin-skinned?
Actually no, I just didn't see it. Either way it doesn't matter. They joke about how we only talk about a minority of their users while selectively picking out posts of our own that are easy to poke fun at. Watching them trying to defend themselves is pretty entertaining.

I can't believe they tried to say that stuff was posted in an ironic sense. That's worse than saying the whole board was a gigantic parody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back