Science Women unable to have children have are given new hope after scientists create an artificial ovary - Troons furious that it's not for them

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ficial-ovary-giving-hope-infertile-women.html

Women unable to have children have are given new hope after scientists create an artificial ovary
  • A synthetic organ made out of the woman's own tissue could be transplanted
  • The infertile woman could then go on to produce eggs naturally herself
  • Technique is being developed to help women and girls who face chemotherapy
Women unable to have children have been given new hope – after scientists created an artificial ovary.

A synthetic organ – made out of the woman's own tissue – could be transplanted into a female left infertile due to medical treatment. She could then go on to produce eggs naturally.

The breakthrough technique is being developed to help women and girls who face chemotherapy for cancer treatment.

Chemotherapy drugs can render a woman infertile as they can destroy ovaries.

Young girls who have not undergone puberty can be rendered sterile before their ovaries can even produce eggs.

One approach to prevent this is to freeze ovarian tissue – which produces eggs – ahead of chemo treatment and replace it afterwards.

But cancer patients risk being re-exposed to cancerous cells harboured in the removed ovarian tissue.

The new technique prevents this by stripping out all of the patients' potentially cancerous cells from the ovarian tissue, leaving just a 'scaffold' – a framework of protein which no longer contains any cells, removing the chance cancer could be lurking.

The framework provides an environment for the patient's ovarian early-stage follicles – which can go on to generate hundreds of eggs – to grow.

It can then be grafted into the patient's body and go on to allow a woman to produce eggs naturally each month.

The experiments will be unveiled today by Dr Susanne Pors from the Rigshospitalet Laboratory of Reproductive Biology in Copenhagen at the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) conference in Barcelona.

Dr Pors said the artificial ovary technique allowed human eggs to develop 'in a tissue bed which is free of malignancies' in the laboratory.

She added: 'This is the first time that isolated human follicles have survived in a decellularised human scaffold, and, as a proof-of-concept, it could offer a new strategy in fertility preservation without risk of malignant cell re-occurrence.'

In further experiments on mice, she said they found that the ovarian cells were 'successfully repopulating'.

Successful trials in humans are expected to be carried out within five years. Dr Pors said the risk of recurring malignancy from frozen tissue was 'real', especially for patients with leukaemia and ovarian cancers, although the risk from other cancers is much lower.

Dr Stuart Lavery, of Imperial College, and spokesman for the British Fertility Society said the technique had 'dramatic potential'.

And Dr Gillian Lockwood, director of Midland Fertility Services, said the treatment could also prevent cancer patients facing premature menopause because their ovarian cells had been destroyed by chemotherapy.

  • UK couples are spending up to £60,000 to have babies through surrogate mothers in the UK, the conference heard. But Natalie Smith, a trustee of the non-profit organisation Surrogacy UK, told ESHRE that the average payment was between £10,000 and £15,000.
 
This is neat until you realize that when the ability to do this becomes available to shady-ass doctors in countries with "questionable" medical ethics laws, there's going to be a wave of batshit-insane women who are menopausal getting this treatment.
The next generation of lolcows are going to be spectacular
 
Some quack needing attention will definitely try to be the first to implant a uterus and/or ovaries into a troon

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lili_Elbe

Tried it in 1931.
Obviously it was a total failure and resulted in death of the man it was implanted into.

Edit- I also notice many sources now claim the uterus was functioning for a couple of months.
Um, no.
Someone how he was lucky enough not to have rejection of the organ for a small period of time.
For a uterus to function it needs things that are specific to the female body and can not be mimicked. At least not in 1931.



And it will never work on men.

It's not like a normal transplant, it needs a biological female to work.
The ones that have been done in women have not all been successful with more failing than actually achieving the goal of pregnancy. Only 2 babies have been born so far.
The transplants are also not meant to be permanent, ideally they will be removed after two successful pregnancies in the woman.
However, the first woman to give birth using a transplanted uterus immediately started rejecting it after her first child was born.

Last year when a big article on uterus transplants was published mainstream a few of the Rat King were of course posting about it and I think even creepy ass Jake Alley.
 
Last edited:
If this ends up being true, does this mean that it'll be possible for post-op trannies to have babies?

EDIT: I guess not, according to the posts I didn't read until after I initially posted this. But who knows? Maybe this is just a step in that direction. Science has been able to do things we never thought possible just a decade or two ago.
 
And it will never work on men.

With stem cell research, it's likely it will happen someday. We're a long ways (100 years?) off and it's not a definite... But it's possible. But definitely not with your typical transplant.

Doubt it. As several people (including myself) have noted, it takes more than just a uterus. They'd be better off investing in artificial womb technology.

Mm. It'd be useful for more than just troons too. Investing in that research benefits everyone with fertility issues, history of still births, etc.
 
This is neat until you realize that when the ability to do this becomes available to shady-ass doctors in countries with "questionable" medical ethics laws, there's going to be a wave of batshit-insane women who are menopausal getting this treatment.
Watch the disability rate shoot through the roof with this as well.
 
I can't get excited about this kind of thing. There are too many people, why does everybody need to pop a kid out...
The kinds of people that could afford to do this are more likely to be the type that should have kids than the ones that just birth litters and leave them to the system to take care of. Pop growth is going down in the 1st world anyway.
 
Back