Science World's rarest great ape is on the brink of extinction - Ape escape?


Less than 800 Tapanuli orangutans remain confined to the small mountainous region of Batang Toru in North Sumatra, Indonesia.
Recognized as a separate species only in 2017, the Tapanuli orangutans suffered a staggering 83 percent decline in just three generations, and retain a mere 2.7 percent of their original habitat occupied 130 years ago.

tapanuli-orang-utan-sumatra.jpg

According to Erik Meijaard, lead author of the recent study and founder of conservation group Borneo Futures, if more than 1 percent of the adult population is extracted — that is killed, translocated or captured — from the wild every year, the species’ extinction is inevitable, which would signal the first great ape extinction in modern times

Screenshot_20210330-132323_Chrome.jpg

By analyzing previously unknown and unpublished historical records, the newly released research contradicts existing scientific claims with two main arguments: Firstly, the Tapanuli orangutans are driven toward extinction in their original habitat due to unsustainable hunting and habitat fragmentation which continue to plague the species.

Secondly, because they were forced out from their natural habitat, they are not adapted to living in highland conditions, and should instead occupy a more diverse range of environments for a better chance of survival, including lowland forests and peatlands.

Hydropower project threatens remaining habitat

Among the many threats faced by the species, a planned hydroelectric power plant along the Batang Toru River in South Tapanuli Regency came under international scrutiny for encroaching on the last remaining habitat of the Tapanuli orangutans.

Although the company responsible for building the dam, PT. North Sumatra Hydro Energy (PT NHSE) claims that the land occupied by the project — around 122 hectares — is negligible, Meijaard and others have pointed out that the issue is not the size of the power plant, but its location.

Pongo_tapanuliensis.jpg

The project sits at the intersection of three subpopulations of Tapanuli orangutans which could be permanently separated if the dam is built. According to the Sumatran Orangutan Conservation Programme (SOCP), the Western block is considered the only genetically viable population in the long run, so connecting it to the Eastern block and two smaller nature reserves are critical to preventing inbreeding and disease, and increasing genetic diversity and thus the survival rate of the species.

Construction for the dam has been temporarily suspended in January 2020 because of COVID-19, and as the Bank of China, slated to become one of the main financiers of the project, has seemingly withdrawn funding, the project faces a delay of up to three years.

Meijaard and co-author Serge Wich, co-vice chair of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) primate specialists’ section on great apes (SGA), have questioned the scientific validity and objectivity of the environmental impact assessment that was carried out by individuals hired by PT NHSE.

They urge to use the suspension of the project as an opportunity to carry out an independent investigation in collaboration with all stakeholders, including the developer, the government, SOCP and IUCN.

Lack of transparency

PT NHSE could not be reached for an interview, but the IUCN released a fact-checking report in 2020 which refutes in detail claims made by the company on the minimal impact of the hydro project on the Tapanuli orangutans and their surrounding ecosystems, and efforts undertaken to mitigate this impact.

Allegations about widespread crackdown on those who spoke up against the hydro dam abound, although PT NHSE denied these claims. Defamation charges and the dismissal of conservationists on the ground were compounded by the suspicious death of an environmental activist and legal aide who at the time was working on a lawsuit aimed to revoke the environmental permit for the dam.

Many of the conservationists and scientists involved on the ground declined a request for comments on the state of the hydro project or efforts to protect the Tapanuli orangutan, often citing fear of backlash. Reluctance to share information publicly reflects a lack of transparency over the issue, says Wich.

Government officials, including Minister of Environment and Forestry Siti Nurbaya, said that the Tapanuli orangutan is at no risk of extinction, and that the hydropower project will have no detrimental impact on the species’ living conditions.

Other threats faced by the species

Wich also cautions against letting the hydropower project divert efforts from addressing some of the other risks faced by the Tapanuli orangutans. Habitat loss in the area has over the years been exacerbated by a variety of extractive activities, including logging, gold and silver mining and geothermal power generation.

SOCP has successfully advocated for a status change in 2014 for 85 percent of the Batang Toru Ecosystem from “production” to “protection forest” which would prohibit any extractive activities. The remaining area, however, is still home to the highest density — 10 percent — of the remaining Tapanuli orangutan population.

Unsustainable hunting and weak law enforcement

In addition, according to Meijaard, orangutan conservationists tend to focus on deforestation and habitat loss, when in reality, the biggest risk is the unsustainable hunting and capture of the species that have been a regular practice for centuries based on the historical records examined in his latest study.

Although orangutans are protected by both national laws and international conventions, “there appears to be a lack of political will to convict people who illegally poach, harm or own orangutans, compared to other wildlife crime,” says Julie Sherman, Executive Director at non-profit Wildlife Impact.

Citing a scientific study, Shearman contrasts the prosecution rate for the illegal poaching and trade of tigers at 90 percent compared to only 0.1 percent for orangutans.

Translocation should remain last resort

Based on figures shared by Meijaard, approximately $80 million is spent on orangutan conservation every year, yet the population numbers of all three orangutan species — the Bornean, the Sumatran and the Tapanuli orangutans — continue to dwindle.

The current focus on orangutan translocation, rehabilitation and reintroduction to the wild is very expensive, and there is limited data available on the welfare or survival rate of the orangutans due to limited post-translocation monitoring, says Meijaard.

Once they are reintroduced into the wild, it’s challenging to track the orangutans remotely because there is no technology available yet, such as chips implanted into the released animals, that’s both reliable and safe for the orangutans, explains Ian Singleton, director of the SOCP.

2018_07_11_49104_1531298807._large.jpg

SOCP, a partnership between the PanEco Foundation, the Foundation for Sustainable Ecosystem (YEL) and the Directorate General of Nature Resources and Ecosystem Conservation (Ditjen KSDAE), operates the only orangutan rehabilitation center in the area.

“Whilst [translocation] may sometimes be in the best interests of the individual orangutans concerned, namely getting them out of a situation in which they are likely to die or be killed, it is not really a sustainable solution to the problem of human-orangutan conflicts, nor is it likely to make much of an impact on the long term conservation prospects for the species, at least at the present time,” adds Singleton.

Translocation does not negate the need to address the wider issues of habitat loss and weak law enforcement, says Panut Hadisiswoyo, founder of the non-profit Orangutan Information Centre (OIC).

While critics warn that translocation is often considered an easy fallback option because the government has made it so easy to report a trespassing orangutan, Hadisiswoyo believes that it’s best to be immediately alerted to a potential human-orangutan conflict so it can be addressed without loss of life.

Prevention and education

Both the SOCP and the OIC place great emphasis on preventative measures to reduce the need for translocation, including the education of local communities on the value of safeguarding orangutans and their ecosystems.

“A coordinated approach is desirable… to tackle not only the drivers of habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, but also community issues that often result in the killing of orangutans in conflict situations,” says Singleton.

Initiatives include building buffer zones of plants to prevent orangutans from crossing over to villages, or conflict mitigation training. The OIC, for example, is teaching locals how to make and use noise-making tools such as bamboo cannons to scare away crop-raiding orangutans without injuring or killing them.

Primatologist Wanda Kuswanda argues in his recent study for the need to offer non-cash support to local communities, including seeds for plants that cannot be consumed by orangutans such as coffee, cocoa or snake fruit. He also recommends developing orangutan ecotourism ventures to demonstrate the economic value of protecting the species.

COVID-19 exacerbates extinction risk

The COVID-19 pandemic has, however, made conservation efforts imminently more challenging.

Although there is limited information on the health impact of COVID-19 on great apes and there are no known cases of infected orangutans, conservationists cannot risk even a small chance of infection for a species that is so close to extinction already.

Screenshot_20210330-132407_Chrome.jpg

Although rescue, translocation and rehabilitation efforts continue, no orangutans have been released into the wild by SOCP since March 2020, and most research studies focused on wild orangutans have been suspended in the past 12 months to mitigate contagion risk.

SOCP’s captive orangutan facilities are operating with strict precautionary measures which have incurred considerable costs at a time when conservation organizations grapple with dwindling funds from both donors or income-generating activities such as tourism.

In addition, based on satellite imagery and other sources, Singleton warns that illegal activities have increased in the forests, as have orangutan killings. Tolerance for the crop-raiding great ape is decreasing as villagers struggle to earn a livelihood amidst the COVID-19 economic crisis.

Despite the grim situation, conservationists and scientists such as Wich or Hadisiswoyo believe that there is still a chance to save the Tapanuli orangutans from extinction, but only if a robust action plan is put in place. Efforts need to focus on protecting their remaining habitat, mitigating human-orangutan conflict without having to translocate the animals, and the improved enforcement of wildlife protection laws.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic has, however, made conservation efforts imminently more challenging.

Although there is limited information on the health impact of COVID-19 on great apes and there are no known cases of infected orangutans, conservationists cannot risk even a small chance of infection for a species that is so close to extinction already.
Journalist mentions COVID for SEO, conservationists milk COVID to grift money for muh self-imposed hardships.

The grift continues despite no evidence to suggest COVID has any impact on these big dumb apes. :story:
 
Ah, so it's a subspecies of orangutan that has maybe one or two different genetic quirks but whose primary distinction is that it lives in a particular place.

Step one: name a new species whose population numbers in the low thousands.

Step two: immediately start shrieking that this species is endangered despite not knowing what the maximum population was to begin with.

Step three: extort, coerce and shame people into going along with your crusade to save this "new species".

Step four: profit (literally).
 
Last edited:
It's harder and harder to give a shit, in principle I'm on the conservation side, but let's get real here... A) Not my problem. B) LOL Asia (also applies to Africa, S. America, Eurasia). C) Big fuckin' deal, be more concerned about bees and plankton than an obscure ape sub-species.

There's really no solution. We'd have to stop Asia from developing at the barrel of a gun. Africa's population boom is gonna wipe out so many animal habitats it'll look like a meteor strike. The bleeding heart thing isn't gonna work. If we're not talking about blockading, sanctioning, and oppressing the shit out entire continents to force a development halt and population crash, we're not talking realistic solutions.
 
Ah, so it's a subspecies of orangutan that has maybe one or two different genetic quirks but whose primary distinction is that it lives in a particular place.

Step one: name a new species whose population numbers in the low thousands.

Step two: immediately start shrieking that this species is endangered despite not knowing what the maximum population was to begin with.

Step three: extort, coerce and shame people into going along with your crusade to save this "new species".

Step four: profit (literally).
That's how nearly all extinction event propaganda goes. They'll sound the alarms over 10,000 species going extinct per second, but if you look up the list it's almost entirely "regular tree frog except specifically located on this one island" or "one of a billion identical subspecies of bacteria". But people don't know that. When they hear about a species going extinct they're thinking of dogs or gorillas or something.

It's an open secret that the word "species" does not mean anything. The closest we have to a definition is that if two animals can't produce fertile offspring then they're different species, except also not depending on if the Definitely Real Scientists Association feels like making the exception, which they do with greater frequency every year.
 
Are the Indonesians raping this species of orangutan too? I know those sick deforesting fucks love to use Bornean orangutans as prostitutes and have probably inadvertantly created some human-orangutan hybrid (because they caused the poor monkey to miscarry).
There's really no solution. We'd have to stop Asia from developing at the barrel of a gun. Africa's population boom is gonna wipe out so many animal habitats it'll look like a meteor strike. The bleeding heart thing isn't gonna work. If we're not talking about blockading, sanctioning, and oppressing the shit out entire continents to force a development halt and population crash, we're not talking realistic solutions.
That's the terrifying part. Current population growth scenarios show Africa will be tied with Asia in population by 2100 at current rates. India will be NUMBAH WAN in population by then (China is rapidly declining at NUMBAH TWO and Nigeria is fast approaching a billion people). If you think the Chinese are bad, imagine a continent full of people who think nothing of going into the jungle, shooting a gorilla, and eating it. That's where AIDS came from, because there was a famine in Africa and they wanted meat so they butchered a bunch of gorillas and didn't give a shit they got their SIV (monkey AIDS) infested blood all over them. And because Africa has almost all the ape species, there's a fuckton of viruses, bacteria, and parasites that evolved alongside them that can infect humans, that's why the continent is so full of disease. Not that it will matter since Africans will eat all the apes long before they'll create COVIDAIDS or whatever.

Africa needs to do something (or someone needs to do something about Africa lol), because their countries can't sustain many more people and Africans will swarm over the world like a horde of locusts and bring about the literal dark ages.
 
Are the Indonesians raping this species of orangutan too? I know those sick deforesting fucks love to use Bornean orangutans as prostitutes and have probably inadvertantly created some human-orangutan hybrid (because they caused the poor monkey to miscarry).

That's the terrifying part. Current population growth scenarios show Africa will be tied with Asia in population by 2100 at current rates. India will be NUMBAH WAN in population by then (China is rapidly declining at NUMBAH TWO and Nigeria is fast approaching a billion people). If you think the Chinese are bad, imagine a continent full of people who think nothing of going into the jungle, shooting a gorilla, and eating it. That's where AIDS came from, because there was a famine in Africa and they wanted meat so they butchered a bunch of gorillas and didn't give a shit they got their SIV (monkey AIDS) infested blood all over them. And because Africa has almost all the ape species, there's a fuckton of viruses, bacteria, and parasites that evolved alongside them that can infect humans, that's why the continent is so full of disease. Not that it will matter since Africans will eat all the apes long before they'll create COVIDAIDS or whatever.

Africa needs to do something (or someone needs to do something about Africa lol), because their countries can't sustain many more people and Africans will swarm over the world like a horde of locusts and bring about the literal dark ages.
Much to consider here.
 
Are the Indonesians raping this species of orangutan too? I know those sick deforesting fucks love to use Bornean orangutans as prostitutes and have probably inadvertantly created some human-orangutan hybrid (because they caused the poor monkey to miscarry).

That's the terrifying part. Current population growth scenarios show Africa will be tied with Asia in population by 2100 at current rates. India will be NUMBAH WAN in population by then (China is rapidly declining at NUMBAH TWO and Nigeria is fast approaching a billion people). If you think the Chinese are bad, imagine a continent full of people who think nothing of going into the jungle, shooting a gorilla, and eating it. That's where AIDS came from, because there was a famine in Africa and they wanted meat so they butchered a bunch of gorillas and didn't give a shit they got their SIV (monkey AIDS) infested blood all over them. And because Africa has almost all the ape species, there's a fuckton of viruses, bacteria, and parasites that evolved alongside them that can infect humans, that's why the continent is so full of disease. Not that it will matter since Africans will eat all the apes long before they'll create COVIDAIDS or whatever.

Africa needs to do something (or someone needs to do something about Africa lol), because their countries can't sustain many more people and Africans will swarm over the world like a horde of locusts and bring about the literal dark ages.
Are there any conversational topics you can't segue into how frightened you are of black people existing?
 
The only way to "solve" these crises would be for the West to stop giving Africa gibs, for all major population centers/ megacities in Asia and Africa to be nuked, and most crops in these nations to be ruined repeatedly. Of course none of this will ever be done, so environmentalists will just continue to ree at local governments of these areas to do something, when all they care about is the economic growth of their country with no limits. It's why China was able to build a massive dam on the Nile river to indebt an African country despite that kind of thing basically nuking the aquatic population anywhere it's put. And they placed it in one of the most ecologically important rivers in the world. Nowadays the only thing that western countries can really do it attempt to promote the ecology of their own lands, because none have the backbone to stop everywhere else from turning into a desert, and while it's working for some areas, I can see the massive import of third worlders completely reversing any or all of these attempts. Especially in Europe.
 
Back