Worst Authors

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Well I'm not a huge fan of Suzanne Collins or Stephanie Meyer and certainly not E L James. I could say them and be over with it, but that might be too lacking for the shit I've seen. So, I'm gonna say around maybe 80-90% of the authors on wattpad, fanfiction.net, fiction press, and archive of our own. Basically it's all shit until you find something good in there. Like a working Xbox in a dumpster.
 
So, I'm gonna say around maybe 80-90% of the authors on wattpad, fanfiction.net, fiction press, and archive of our own. Basically it's all shit until you find something good in there. Like a working Xbox in a dumpster.

Those numbers are too generous. That's the percentage you get when some kind of quality control is implemented. The real shit factor is more like 96% (and I still think that's a bit of a reach).

It is, however, a glorious day when you stumble upon the golden pin hidden in a pile of shit.
 
Tom Kratman for being completely batshit against Muslims (and thinks that Rammstein are neo-nazis. What a goddamn cunt), Anne Rice (for her being an asshole to her fans, not for writing bad books. Her books are OK, but I read them too long ago, probably I wouldn't like them now) and the idiot who wrote Twilight.
 
Tom Kratman for being completely batshit against Muslims (and thinks that Rammstein are neo-nazis. What a goddamn cunt), Anne Rice (for her being an asshole to her fans, not for writing bad books. Her books are OK, but I read them too long ago, probably I wouldn't like them now) and the idiot who wrote Twilight.
Stephanie Meyer?
 
J K Rowling. Successful or not, that amount of alliteration when naming characters shows a laziness that's inexcusable. Also if you're going to toss token ethnics into the mix try harder than 'Padme Patel' and fucking 'Cho Chang' That's not just lazy, it's borderline racist. Finally if you're going to use poorly disguised french to attempt to call your bad guy Lord Murder at least check first that Vol De Mort translates as murder instead of Lord Death Flight.
I will grant you that her work improves towards the end of the series and it's not that I didn't find the books diverting but there's a reason her work since has bombed hard. Casual Vacancy was a shit attempt to try and turn herself into a latter day Agatha Christie and it was a laughable mess of a novel that had little to no charm or suspense.
 
J K Rowling. Successful or not, that amount of alliteration when naming characters shows a laziness that's inexcusable. Also if you're going to toss token ethnics into the mix try harder than 'Padme Patel' and fucking 'Cho Chang' That's not just lazy, it's borderline racist. Finally if you're going to use poorly disguised french to attempt to call your bad guy Lord Murder at least check first that Vol De Mort translates as murder instead of Lord Death Flight.
I will grant you that her work improves towards the end of the series and it's not that I didn't find the books diverting but there's a reason her work since has bombed hard. Casual Vacancy was a shit attempt to try and turn herself into a latter day Agatha Christie and it was a laughable mess of a novel that had little to no charm or suspense.

She's a really good storyteller. As a stylist, she's pretty bad.

And no, I don't think she got better as the books progressed. The final book is a mess.
 
Daniel O'Malley. He's only written one book, The Rook, (I think its sequel is out now) and it was like some cross between The X-Files and X-Men and it was absolutely atrocious. It was a trainwreck of a novel that I only finished because it got increasingly worse as I went along and wanted to see the carnage at the end. Every female character talks like a girl from a 1990s LA highschool movie. The characters beyond the protagonist can be summed up in one or two words. The novel's worldbuilding is done through journal entries and letters being read by the main character and are basically massive encyclopedia entries between each chapter. As the book goes on, the entries become increasingly longer and less relevant to the plot. It also couldn't find a tone - the main character is dealing with situations where the fate of the world is at stake from her position as a high muckamuck in a top secret government organization, terrorist attacks and the like, and the next chapter involves these bizarre, hamfisted attempts at humor where the character goes out clubbing and spends 20 pages describing her trials and tribulations at getting her car back from a parking garage and lamenting at all the gross alien goop all over her clothes.

It genuinely seemed like some kid's novel that he worked on all through high school and kept being told it was brilliant and he was such a good writer and some publisher snapped it up thinking it was going to be a bigger hit than it was.
 
Last edited:
It's kind of weird, defining what makes an author good or bad; is it how well they've sold their works, how well they tell the story, how influential they are, how much money they've made, so much etc.

Anyway, I'm guessing we're just describing the ones we don't like, so:
1.) George R.R. Martin has too many characters in his novel and the split of perspective through every chapter plus each chapter being an endless drone of nothing too interesting makes ASOIAF's plot, if any, incoherent and just a bore to read. I'm sure the lot of you have an easier time, but I couldn't get into the books too well.
2.) John Green. Just don't like him. I had to read The Fault in Our Stars for required reading in high school because my English teacher couldn't get enough of him, and that was just about the worst book I've ever read.
3.) Christina Rossetti. If I had a dime for every time I had to read and analyse "Goblin Market" in high school, I'd be a rich motherfucker.
4.) A.S. Byatt.
5.) Orson Scott Card isn't bad at what he does, but he's pretty bad at telling an interesting story. How Ender's Game wound up on required reading lists in some schools is beyond me.

J K Rowling. Successful or not, that amount of alliteration when naming characters shows a laziness that's inexcusable. Also if you're going to toss token ethnics into the mix try harder than 'Padme Patel' and fucking 'Cho Chang' That's not just lazy, it's borderline racist. Finally if you're going to use poorly disguised french to attempt to call your bad guy Lord Murder at least check first that Vol De Mort translates as murder instead of Lord Death Flight.
I will grant you that her work improves towards the end of the series and it's not that I didn't find the books diverting but there's a reason her work since has bombed hard. Casual Vacancy was a shit attempt to try and turn herself into a latter day Agatha Christie and it was a laughable mess of a novel that had little to no charm or suspense.

You have to take into account that the majority of the series was written for children and young adults. Having read the books recently, I have to agree with Bradsternum that the story by itself is great, but how it's written is just pretty awful. The alliterative naming scheme, however, isn't something you find just in Harry Potter, though - you find it in various other works of literature, and the biggest place you can find alliteration in nomenclature are Marvel comics; in this case, it was to make it easier for the intended audience to remember the names. I see you only sight Padma Patil and Cho Chang as the token ethnics, when you also have Parvati Patil, Dean Thomas, Blaise Zabini, and... yeah, that's pretty much it.
On another note, there are three things the French word voler can mean. It can mean "to fly", "to flee", and "to steal". Voler de mort can mean "to fly from death", "to flee from death", or "to steal from death", and the name Voldemort is derived from voleur (one who flies/flees/steals) de mort (from death). Though poorly disguised French, Voldemort is meant to be a portmanteau of voleur de mort, as it's explained he has divided his soul into eight pieces (though one is unintentional) in a vain attempt to escape death, which he fears immensely. The average child probably won't be able to figure out this bit of nomenclature, anyway, so why bother. There's only one other instance where she uses French, which is in one chapter of Goblet of Fire where they're fleeing the World Cup and run into some French girl; the grammar in that one fragment of a sentence is just appalling.
 
Victoria Foyt, author of those awful "Save the Pearls" books

No young adult series with fucking blackface as a major plot point can ever be good.
 
I've let slip elsewhere that I'm a big Doctor Who fan. For Christmas one year one of my then-housemates bought me a load of novelisations of classic serials that were written by Terrance Dicks who was the script editor for the show in the 70s. I'd heard about these novelisations before but I'd never read any of them (or any Doctor Who books in general) so I was interested to see what they were like.

I started reading one and... God it was bad. I've heard of workman-like prose but this was more like someone had just copy-pasted in the script and added in "this character said, that character said". They were written in the 70s before the advent of home video, so they were the only way for kids of the time to catch up with episodes they'd missed. That's the only explanation I can give for how they sold at all, cos I've seen better writing on fan fiction forums.

Novelists can often transition perfectly well into screenwriting (George MacDonald Fraser, Michael Chabon, William Gibson) but if Terrance Dicks is any indication, the transition the other way ain't so smooth.
 
It's kind of weird, defining what makes an author good or bad; is it how well they've sold their works, how well they tell the story, how influential they are, how much money they've made, so much etc.

Anyway, I'm guessing we're just describing the ones we don't like, so:
1.) George R.R. Martin has too many characters in his novel and the split of perspective through every chapter plus each chapter being an endless drone of nothing too interesting makes ASOIAF's plot, if any, incoherent and just a bore to read. I'm sure the lot of you have an easier time, but I couldn't get into the books too well.

Oh God, yes. His fanboys are so fucking irritating. The show's pretty good, but the books?
original.jpg
 
Darkstar is deliberately a bitch and for 8 Cersei is pretty nuts.

The rest though? I like the books, but I really have to agree with you. Heck, fat pink mast is so bad it's become a running joke in some places.

I'd almost argue that a ton of those are sex related and Gurm is terrible at those, but I'm sleepy and wrong.
 
Laurel K Hamilton. The idea of Vampires and werecreatures living out in the open is a great idea, but is often wasted. A lot of her more current work has little to no plot, the petty relationship dramas dominate the story, a self-insert Mary-Sue main character who would make a better villain, it's all the author's personal, self-glorifying spank fodder and insufferable characters.
Seconding this. There's also a comic version of some of the books that I managed to get a hold of and it wasn't much better. Though it was slightly more tolerable, honestly, because it had some unintentional hilarity regarding the artwork.
 
Seconding this. There's also a comic version of some of the books that I managed to get a hold of and it wasn't much better. Though it was slightly more tolerable, honestly, because it had some unintentional hilarity regarding the artwork.
Hamilton has no idea on how comics and novels differ. Comics let a lot of art speak for itself and doesn't need constant narration. It was also amazing how much one woman can cock-block her own comic. A giant zombie comes into your bedroom to kill you and you're out of bullets? Well, in the next issue, the male cops take care of the problem for Anita (it's just alluded to and not shown) so we can focus more on Anita being upset and washing her penguin collection. The thighs Bret Booth put on the women is ungodly and it's weird how much Anita and Jean Claude look like brother and sister.

Oh, and you know that review Linkara did years ago of the Anita Blake comics? I'm the one who sent those comics to him.
 
Like, as far as Victorian authors go, there's quite a few that are considered the cream of creams and some that are just plain awful. I unfortunately signed up for a class dedicated to Victorian science fiction and fantasy (only because it was the only one available that fit my schedule), which requires me to read some books I've always thought of reading but never bothered. I realised from this how much I do not like Mary Shelley.

Like, sure, she's responsible for probably one of the most acclaimed works in the horror genre, and she's also responsible for several other novels that no one really cares about because oh wow Frankenstein. The problem is, the Victorian language is so fucking dry. Imagine a piece of toast upon which butter evaporates; that's how bad it is, at least to me. I imagine she was too busy being an almost full-time piece of ass for Percy, so of course she wouldn't be able to write a story that was truly engaging; then again, no one in 1817 would have imagined that any of their contemporaries could have been described as a "fuckboy" by their great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren.

Tl;dr - Mary Shelley had a good idea, she just couldn't make it interesting.
 
Last edited:
Hamilton has no idea on how comics and novels differ. Comics let a lot of art speak for itself and doesn't need constant narration. It was also amazing how much one woman can cock-block her own comic. A giant zombie comes into your bedroom to kill you and you're out of bullets? Well, in the next issue, the male cops take care of the problem for Anita (it's just alluded to and not shown) so we can focus more on Anita being upset and washing her penguin collection. The thighs Bret Booth put on the women is ungodly and it's weird how much Anita and Jean Claude look like brother and sister.

Oh, and you know that review Linkara did years ago of the Anita Blake comics? I'm the one who sent those comics to him.
namethisemotion.png

But seriously, while the idea that vampires and werewolves are allowed to walk among us is interesting and refreshing, she fucks it up. Badly. Especially with the vampires actively preying on people.

I get so disappointed when there are these actually decent ideas that wind up in the hands of writers like this.
 
The Fault In Our Stars did suck.

One part that stuck out to me as really bad was the main character and her boyfriend make out in the Anne Frank museum. And then the entire tour group applauded. He might as well have gone all the way and replaced making out with the main characters telling off some Neo-nazi who showed up at the museum.

And then the entire tour group applauded.
 
Whoever wrote those The Clique books that where popular like 10 years back

They were like Gossip Girl if it was written by that creepy older cousin that's not allowed near your little sister anymore

There's a girl who's like 12-13 with fucking breast implants
 
Last edited:
Worst author?

R. A. Salvatore.

I'll admit it. I used to read his Forgotten Realms books all the time as a teenager, even his series with the
Summa Cum Laude Mary Sue- Drizzt Do'Urden.

Then, thankfully I met The Knife, and she exposed me to well written sword n' sorcery like Fritz Leiber's
Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, and Michael Moorcock's Elric saga.
 
Back
Top Bottom