- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
I was referring to the 1995 movie but both are terrible. I feel bad for Raul Julia.Which one the 1995 movie about Guile or the 2009 movie about Chun Li?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was referring to the 1995 movie but both are terrible. I feel bad for Raul Julia.Which one the 1995 movie about Guile or the 2009 movie about Chun Li?
I don't, he hammed it up gloriously.I was referring to the 1995 movie ... I feel bad for Raul Julia.
I'm not even that big into Resi and I think the movies are shit too. Don't even get me started on Alice.I'm a pretty big Resident Evil fan. I saw the first 3 movies and the only one that even remotely got close to the games was the second one and even then it was shit.
Come to think of it, most if not all movies that are video game adaptations are pretty shitty... at least the ones I've seen.
The Wicker Man, 2006 version.
The way I see it and the way Max Brooks sees it is that the movie is so unrelated to the book that it's not an adaptation at all. It's more like an entirely separate thing with occasional nods to the book but that's about it.
I think it was at comicon he said he wasn't upset that they'd changed things because they'd changed so much it was no longer his story. He had no connection to the thing on the screen.
This happens with a few Hollywood movies. Someone comes to them with an original script about, say, a zombie war and the script gets bought. But some suit decides that no one will give a shit about this movie unless it has a known IP attached to it. Because people are morons who are terrified by new things, apparently. So they take the name of a well known work and slap it on the movie, rework the script so it kind of looks like the work its named after and call it a day. This is what happened to the iRobot film too.
If I were to adapt World War Z I'd have made it into a mini-series framed like a series of interviews. The story would unfold like it does in the book but every once in a while it would jump back to the interview. I think that way you keep the original story, characters and framing device. An actual faithful adaptation.
Alternatively, make it a mini-series where each episode is pretty much made up in the style of a tv-documentary. Like, take all the elements of the book that are involving a certain historical event in the zombie war (like the outbreak in China), out them all together, make a bit more of an overall narrative around it, add if necessary a few elements (like extra interviews) in it and you have an episode. Rince, repeat (with other themes from the book) and there you have it
The movie adaptation of The Neverending Story, while most think it's good (including myself), can be argued to be a pretty bad adaptation because it leaves out half the story. It appears that the author of the book hated the film.
Other ones that come to mind are all those that stick classic characters in the "real world" or modern day like The Smurfs or Alvin and the Chipmunks series. The plots always seem to revolve more around the secondary character's struggles rather than the characters we actually came to see.