Worst of Stephen King - Worst books or stories

Worst story collections

  • The Bazaar of Bad Dreams

    Votes: 15 10.4%
  • Different Seasons

    Votes: 5 3.5%
  • Everything's Eventual

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Four Past Midnight

    Votes: 9 6.3%
  • Full Dark, No Stars

    Votes: 10 6.9%
  • Hearts in Atlantis

    Votes: 55 38.2%
  • If It Bleeds

    Votes: 13 9.0%
  • Just After Sunset

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • Night Shift

    Votes: 11 7.6%
  • Nightmares & Dreamscapes

    Votes: 7 4.9%
  • Skeleton Crew

    Votes: 7 4.9%

  • Total voters
    144
I always got fugazi vibes when i hear about King's wild cocaine and alcohol days, the faggot has always came off like a colossal lightweight to me, i feel his addiction days are wildly exaggerated, aside from his sycophantic audience assuring its validity i've seen no proof of it existing at all, are there interviews where he's fucked up that exist?
 
I always got fugazi vibes when i hear about King's wild cocaine and alcohol days, the faggot has always came off like a colossal lightweight to me, i feel his addiction days are wildly exaggerated, aside from his sycophantic audience assuring its validity i've seen no proof of it existing at all, are there interviews where he's fucked up that exist?
I went to see Gregory MacDonald, author of the Fletch series, give a talk at the local library and he says that Stephen King just showed up at his house one morning and starting drinking all the beer in the house. His wife has mentioned the drug problems. I'm not sure if he's exaggerating or not, but I think he definitely had problems with addiction.
I'm not too familiar with King as I don't read his works but I have watched one of his film adaptations, The Shawshank Redemption, which was considered superior to the book counterpart, Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption. Would this thread consider his novel to be good or something that is only elevated by the movie and Frank Darabont's direction?
Shawshank Redemption is a pretty good novella, probably the best part of Different Seasons. I thought the movie was great, but I thought the novella was just as good. I also might be alone in this, but I thought the book of The Shining was better than the Kubrick film.
 
Last edited:
I always got fugazi vibes when i hear about King's wild cocaine and alcohol days, the faggot has always came off like a colossal lightweight to me, i feel his addiction days are wildly exaggerated, aside from his sycophantic audience assuring its validity i've seen no proof of it existing at all, are there interviews where he's fucked up that exist?

Read It.
This is clearly the tome of a deranged, coke fueled mind.
 
Has King ever written a good novel?
One that springs to mind, for me, is may be The Eyes of the Dragon, which IIRC he said he wrote so that his daughter could read something from him.

I used to read a lot of King's works in my teens and early 20s. However, I will admit that I sped through most of them, especially the big ones (like IT, the unabridged edition of The Stand, and Under the Dome). I stopped following him when I grew tired of his political rants and seeing how his views bled into his novels.
 
You have Christine where a car comes to life and kills people.

You have Maximum Overdrive where multiple cars come to life and kill people.

Then you have From a Buick 8 where a car comes to life and does nothing the entire book. One of King's most boring books in my opinion.
 
Has King ever written a good novel? Back in the day I tried a lot of his stuff, because the odd duality is that from a distance his work sounds interesting... some of the concepts in Insomnia, Dark Tower etc. all have promise... but then you actually read his work and he just gets bogged down talking about how everyone is absolutely psychotic, nobody is likable, and he's way too obsessed with describing bowel movements.

And of course left-wingers love his work. Probably because this is exactly how they see the world.
I think most of the stuff he wrote during the cocaine years is pretty good. After he got off drugs, it's really hit or miss. I didn't like Rose Madder, Insomnia, Duna Key, Lisey's Story, or the last few Dark Tower books, However, I think Revival and 11/22/63 are some of the best things he's ever written. He's not as good as he used to be, but I don't think his decline has been as severe as say, Dean Koontz.
 
Pretty funny to see Hearts in Atlantis with such a monstrous lead in the poll. But yeah I agree, that's probably his worst short story collection to date. Some of them I haven't read, some I have. His early stuff is all pretty solid (I haven't read 4 Past Midnight), everything up to Nightmares and Dreamscapes anyway. Everything's Eventual was mostly ehhhh and I can't remember any of it. Just After Sunset was the same, I can't fucking remember a single story from that collection. Full Dark No Stars was all right. Haven't read Bazaar. Read 3/4 of If It Bleeds so far and it swings from pretty decent to huh.

Most of his full length novels I've read have been pretty OK. I remember Cujo was kind of boring because so much of it was building up the tension in the family but it was just monumentally tedious having to read about some alcoholic or some bimbo who decided to cheat on her husband. Under the Dome felt really weird because there were dudes using meth. Reading Stephen King trying to be hip with the times is really strange. I don't wanna read about people using cell phones in a Stephen King book. Cell was kind of cliche as well. I haven't really read much of his modern novels aside from those two. The older stuff is perfectly fine and I do like his Bachman books quite a bit. I also read MOST of The Dark Tower and while I think it sort of loses the plot, it was mostly serviceable schlock. I forget why I stopped reading it and I will probably have to re-read most of it again (aside from The Gunslinger, as I read that book a few times as a kid and remember it well enough).
 
I also read MOST of The Dark Tower and while I think it sort of loses the plot, it was mostly serviceable schlock. I forget why I stopped reading it and I will probably have to re-read most of it again (aside from The Gunslinger, as I read that book a few times as a kid and remember it well enough).
Honestly the only time I feel it kinda lost the plot was in the sixth book, and it's so short that it's worth just powering through it anyway.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Un-Clit
Honestly the only time I feel it kinda lost the plot was in the sixth book, and it's so short that it's worth just powering through it anyway.
There were a couple moments along the way where I was like "man this is kinda lame", I forget where they were exactly but I remember feeling that at least once every book or so. Just certain decisions that were made where you're like "why did he write this in this specific really weird way"
 
Just certain decisions that were made where you're like "why did he write this in this specific really weird way"
The answer is always

alc-and-cocaine-1200x480.png
 
He's not as good as he used to be, but I don't think his decline has been as severe as say, Dean Koontz.
Aw man, I've been getting into his books (mainly the early stuff) after I left King.
Reading Stephen King trying to be hip with the times is really strange.
Under the Dome had an instance where it took a shot at Stephenie Meyer. It just felt like a cheap shot after what he said about Meyer as writer in 2009.
 
I always got fugazi vibes when i hear about King's wild cocaine and alcohol days, the faggot has always came off like a colossal lightweight to me, i feel his addiction days are wildly exaggerated, aside from his sycophantic audience assuring its validity i've seen no proof of it existing at all, are there interviews where he's fucked up that exist?
Remember, the alternative is that he's writing prepubescent gangbangs with a clear head.
 
Under the Dome felt really weird because there were dudes using meth.
Under the Dome was a perfect example of why I find his writing so infuriating. Even when he occasionally manages to get me invested, he builds to a fever pitch of tension with all these story threads leading to everything going completely to hell simultaneously and I'm just dying to find out where all this insanity is going... and then it limps unsatisfyingly across the finish line.

You can tell the very moment he gets bored with a story concept and slaps on the first ending that comes to mind. And the worst part is he's been pulling that same trick for the better part of 50 years now, so I really have no right to complain.
 
and then it limps unsatisfyingly across the finish line.

You can tell the very moment he gets bored with a story concept and slaps on the first ending that comes to mind. And the worst part is he's been pulling that same trick for the better part of 50 years now, so I really have no right to complain.
His absolute weakest skill is writing a good, compelling ending, for sure. The novels struggle with this much more than the short stories, but yeah, he absolutely blows at ending his stories in a way that doesn't come off as half-assed bullshit he came up with because the deadline was in 4 days and he ran out of time.

I recently re-read The Stand and was blown away at how anticlimactically the whole apocalyptic confrontation with Randall Flagg turns out. Trashcan Man shows up and a nuke goes off and everyone dies lmao. And then Stu Redman and Tom Cullen spend 3 chapters going home and then the story is over! Wow that 800 pages of buildup sure was worth it to see the final conflict resolved via a deus ex machina in the space of 2 pages. Epic.
 
I recently re-read The Stand and was blown away at how anticlimactically the whole apocalyptic confrontation with Randall Flagg turns out. Trashcan Man shows up and a nuke goes off and everyone dies lmao. And then Stu Redman and Tom Cullen spend 3 chapters going home and then the story is over! Wow that 800 pages of buildup sure was worth it to see the final conflict resolved via a deus ex machina in the space of 2 pages. Epic.
I don't know, at the end of the day I thought it was great. It would have been really gay if it had ended with some kind of Avengers like fight between good and evil.

Evil fails because... evil is bound to fail. It might take over, but eventually due to its very nature it's always gonna fuck up. It's never gone for good, but it's gonna go away for a while.

"Overconfidence is going to fuck you over" is an overarching theme throughout the whole book, it starts with the people who built the captain trip's virus facility, the people who created captain trip, the guy who thought he would be able to get away, the entire world dying because they thought they could contain it, the guy who experimented on stu and the rest of the team were also far too overconfident in their own measures and died as a result.

It just goes on and on and on. The other team is "treat people nicely, or it's going to come back and bite you in the ass". They often go hand in hand, too. Nadine, fat boy, etc... all had a chip on their shoulder, all thought they were special, all pushed people away... and all failed as a result.

People dicked over Trashcan Man because he was weird, and he ended up making them all burn.

Yeah, it's anti-climatic, sure, but some gay ass dragon ball z fighting in the middle of Vegas would have been much worse.
 
His absolute weakest skill is writing a good, compelling ending, for sure. The novels struggle with this much more than the short stories, but yeah, he absolutely blows at ending his stories in a way that doesn't come off as half-assed bullshit he came up with because the deadline was in 4 days and he ran out of time.

I recently re-read The Stand and was blown away at how anticlimactically the whole apocalyptic confrontation with Randall Flagg turns out. Trashcan Man shows up and a nuke goes off and everyone dies lmao. And then Stu Redman and Tom Cullen spend 3 chapters going home and then the story is over! Wow that 800 pages of buildup sure was worth it to see the final conflict resolved via a deus ex machina in the space of 2 pages. Epic.
The Regulators is a perfect example of a quarter assed ending. Well, quarter assed everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chester Rigby
Pet Sematary was the only one of his books that truly scared the shit out of me.
I was 21 and just had my first cheeselet when I read it while staying at my parents. Scared me so damn bad I got in bed with my mom.

Different Seasons was an odd one, Apt Pupil made me wonder what kind of person SK really was after the cat in the oven part.
The Breathing Method had a snippet of another story about a senator that finds something in the woods and can't kill it, and he had it in the trunk of his car. I wanted King to tell more of THAT story.

I've been noticing in more of his books that he's writing more about children being abused, The Institute and a few others are examples of that, and I don't like that direction.

I liked Doctor Sleep, but the movie sucked ass. Carrie, Stand by Me, The Shawshank Redemption, and Kubricks The Shining are the only movies of his that are good.
Apt Pupil made me wonder what kind of person SK really was after the cat in the oven part
and not the "main character has a wet dream about raping a Jewish girl in a concentration camp" part?
 
I don't know, at the end of the day I thought it was great. It would have been really gay if it had ended with some kind of Avengers like fight between good and evil.

Evil fails because... evil is bound to fail. It might take over, but eventually due to its very nature it's always gonna fuck up. It's never gone for good, but it's gonna go away for a while.

"Overconfidence is going to fuck you over" is an overarching theme throughout the whole book, it starts with the people who built the captain trip's virus facility, the people who created captain trip, the guy who thought he would be able to get away, the entire world dying because they thought they could contain it, the guy who experimented on stu and the rest of the team were also far too overconfident in their own measures and died as a result.

It just goes on and on and on. The other team is "treat people nicely, or it's going to come back and bite you in the ass". They often go hand in hand, too. Nadine, fat boy, etc... all had a chip on their shoulder, all thought they were special, all pushed people away... and all failed as a result.

People dicked over Trashcan Man because he was weird, and he ended up making them all burn.

Yeah, it's anti-climatic, sure, but some gay ass dragon ball z fighting in the middle of Vegas would have been much worse.
That's one interpretation, but the way it was realized is the thing that disappointed me. You could absolutely write a good ending that is abrupt and due to the overconfidence of "evil", but not the way it was written.

At least IMO

and not the "main character has a wet dream about raping a Jewish girl in a concentration camp" part?

He's got a darkness inside him and the darkness is being fed and nurtured by his communication with the old man. His continued decline into horrific psychopathy is a very blatant symbol of this. I personally thought Apt Pupil was great.
 
Last edited:
Back