Would it be OK to commit genocide on the gays?

Get rid of all the gays?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 44 38.3%
  • No.

    Votes: 71 61.7%

  • Total voters
    115
So we know that through the first rule of Channery that OP = faggot
Now, through the transitive property, we know this thread is simply a cry for help.
Now, we see the poll, which when taken with the aforementioned data, means we're cutting whether he kills himself or not

Do the needful, everyone
 
I'm not sure how you could have a "genocide" against gays. As far as I know LGBT people aren't an ethnic group and nobody has a found a gay gene.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
That's exactly why I'm so excited to get started! Since it's difficult to prove that someone is actually gay, we're going to have to play it safe and just liquidate 95% of the population.
Well if you had just come out and said that I could have agreed with you earlier. Thanos main problem was that 50% wasnt nearly enough.
 
lol gays aren't an ethnic group you dumb fuck.

Alan Turing, Leonardo Da Vinci, the ancient Greeks, countless artists of all kinds etc. etc. I'd say the gays have contributed a huge amount to humanity relative to their numbers.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
If we genocide the gays, we'll be indirectly supporting Islam. And we don't want that, do we?

We need to put Amy Coney Barrett in charge of who gets the gas

Gaze into the face of fear

She's not keen on the kebabs or the gays. Or Democrats. Or atheists.

You'd best be prepared to answer questions on theology and the laws of the Old Republic and the New Theocracy.
 
We need to put Amy Coney Barrett in charge of who gets the gas

View attachment 794178

She's not keen on the kebabs or the gays. Or Democrats. Or atheists.

You'd best be prepared to answer questions on theology and the laws of the Old Republic and the New Theocracy.
But then we'd be putting a woman in charge, therefore we'd be the Democrats. And then what?
 
Back