Would you date a girl that wears 40s factory work clothes?

Daddy's Angry Juice

Daddy's Angry Juice

Found guilty of party rocking
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 29, 2024
For the zoomers out there.
image_2025-03-18_180413452.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: オプセック, clara red bottoms, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans and 1 other person
Sort by date Sort by votes
DankSmoker said:
Damn she looks like shes smacked out, no wonder they revamped her image.
Click to expand...
Tbh I only made the initial post to be a pedant because bored.
Sure, the "we can do it" poster originally had zero affiliation with Rosie, Rosie originates from a song. But at this point that poster is what comes up whenever Rosie is mentioned and you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who knows the song even exists.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Penis Drager 2.0 said:
Tbh I only made the initial post to be a pedant because bored.
Sure, the "we can do it" poster originally had zero affiliation with Rosie, Rosie originates from a song. But at this point that poster is what comes up whenever Rosie is mentioned and you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who knows the song even exists.
Click to expand...
Well I didn't know she started out as the least sexy pinup, so thanks for informing us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moths
Upvote 0 Downvote
Daddy's Angry Juice said:
You know when I started this thread, I never expected it to be so educational
Click to expand...
Here's another fun fact to leave you with:
Westinghouse Electric, where the poster in your OP comes from, is the same company Nikola Tesla worked for.
After a series of business dealings, it has split into CBS and Viacom.

Edit: I guess more shit happened since 2019. Both merged again and now operate as Paramount Global.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Gravityqueen4life, lolcow yoghurt, Daddy's Angry Juice and 1 other person
Upvote 0 Downvote
Penis Drager 2.0 said:
Here's another fun fact to leave you with:
Westinghouse Electric, where the poster in your OP comes from, is the same company Nikola Tesla worked for.
After a series of business dealings, it has split into CBS and Viacom.

Edit: I guess more shit happened since 2019. Both merged again and now operate as Paramount Global.
Click to expand...
Did you know that, in addition to typical jewery, one of the major reasons all the food companies are owned by a few conglomerates is because when public perception on cigarettes started to shift, the cigarette companies pivoted to buying food companies and pumping up the addictive substances -- mainly fructose -- to keep the same business strategy?

Unlike glucose and other caloric sources, fructose in mammals has an antagonistic effect on satiety -- rather than making you less hungry, it makes you more hungry. This is because mammals tend to hibernate in the winter, so the mammals with this adaptation would load up on berries in the summer and fall and build up a larger caloric surplus in the form of fat to survive the winter. When dealing with the concentrations of fructose in whole foods -- i.e. fruits -- this effect isn't that pronounced, but one can of coke contains as much fructose as five apples or ~130 strawberries. This leads to a feedback loop where people will drink pop, which makes them hungry, which makes them eat food, with which they drink more pop. If you've ever wondered, purely on a technical, logistical, biomechanical level, how some people can even get that fucking fat, this is a part of it. And there is evidence to suggest a correlation with aggression as well -- which makes sense if you think about it, if your body was constantly telling you you're starving no matter how many thousands of calories of corn syrup you pump into it, you'd be pissed off too.

This in general is the core of the argument for whole foods and against processed foods. Similar effects exist with other processed foods, such as seed and vegetable oils, which contain the same substances found in the seeds and vegetables they're made from, but at concentrations so high that you literally could not physically consume and digest enough seeds to match the amount of linoleic acid you consume from even a small amount of oil, which in turn causes inflammation and oxidative stress and a bunch of other shit I don't remember anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just A Fat Round Bird and Chester Copperpot
Upvote 0 Downvote
dick brain said:
pumping up the addictive substances -- mainly fructose -- to keep the same business strategy?
Click to expand...
dick brain said:
Unlike glucose and other caloric sources
Click to expand...
"Processed" foods do not have a higher fructose to glucose ratio than "whole" foods. An apple, organic or not, has about a 2:1 ratio of fructose to glucose whereas HFCS has a roughly 1:1 ratio.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
Upvote 0 Downvote
dick brain said:
You are illiterate.
Click to expand...
No, I understand your argument very well:
The "core of the argument for whole foods" is that tobacco companies bought up a lot of the food companies and started loading them with addictive substances. Specifically, you cited fructose and sneed oils.
With regard to fructose, you argued that it does not provide the same feeling of satiation as "glucose and other caloric sources." So foods with "thousands of calories of corn syrup" added to them will not make someone feel as though they have taken in a adequate amount of food and therefore people will eat more.
This argument only makes sense if you believe these processed foods have a higher ratio of fructose to other caloric sources, which I explained is patently false. HFCS has significantly LESS fructose than the same weight of sugar you would extract from an apple. Your argument is built upon a "fact" that simply isn't true.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Penis Drager 2.0 said:
No, I understand your argument very well:
The "core of the argument for whole foods" is that tobacco companies bought up a lot of the food companies and started loading them with addictive substances. Specifically, you cited fructose and sneed oils.
With regard to fructose, you argued that it does not provide the same feeling of satiation as "glucose and other caloric sources." So foods with "thousands of calories of corn syrup" added to them will not make someone feel as though they have taken in a adequate amount of food and therefore people will eat more.
This argument only makes sense if you believe these processed foods have a higher ratio of fructose to other caloric sources, which I explained is patently false. HFCS has significantly LESS fructose than the same weight of sugar you would extract from an apple. Your argument is built upon a "fact" that simply isn't true.
Click to expand...

Ur gay lmao
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Just A Fat Round Bird, Tragi-Chan, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans and 1 other person
Upvote 0 Downvote
dick brain said:
Rosie the Riveter was propaganda to get women into the workforce to double the tax revenue per household while oversaturating the labor market and devaluing labor and normalizing a dual-income household so employers don't have to pay men a wage that can sustain a family but that aside yeah I would.
Click to expand...
I thought it was propaganda to get women into factories so the military industrial complex could continue since all the men had been drafted and now were being sent overseas to be mowed down or bombed or what have you
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: OrionBalls, dick brain and Agent Abe Caprine
Upvote 0 Downvote
Penis Drager 2.0 said:
No, I understand your argument very well:
The "core of the argument for whole foods" is that tobacco companies bought up a lot of the food companies and started loading them with addictive substances. Specifically, you cited fructose and sneed oils.
With regard to fructose, you argued that it does not provide the same feeling of satiation as "glucose and other caloric sources." So foods with "thousands of calories of corn syrup" added to them will not make someone feel as though they have taken in a adequate amount of food and therefore people will eat more.
This argument only makes sense if you believe these processed foods have a higher ratio of fructose to other caloric sources, which I explained is patently false. HFCS has significantly LESS fructose than the same weight of sugar you would extract from an apple. Your argument is built upon a "fact" that simply isn't true.
Click to expand...
Wrong. Fructose doesn't not make you satiated, it makes you the opposite of satiated. It makes you more hungry. The more you consume, the more you feel the need to consume. That's why it's profitable.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
dick brain said:
Wrong. Fructose doesn't not make you satiated, it makes you the opposite of satiated. It makes you more hungry. The more you consume, the more you feel the need to consume. That's why it's profitable.
Click to expand...
That still does not address the fact that HFCS does not have more fructose than natural forms of sugar.
Hell, plain corn syrup is almost 100% glucose. Any argument which somehow hinges on the metabolism of fructose vs other forms of sugar is an absolute non-starter.
not to mention the reason HFCS is profitable is really because of US tariffs on sugar cane and US corn subsidies, which is the real reason you don't see it much outside of the US.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Penis Drager 2.0 said:
That still does not address the fact that HFCS does not have more fructose than natural forms of sugar.
Hell, plain corn syrup is almost 100% glucose. Any argument which somehow hinges on the metabolism of fructose vs other forms of sugar is an absolute non-starter.
not to mention the reason HFCS is profitable is really because of US tariffs on sugar cane and US corn subsidies, which is the real reason you don't see it much outside of the US.
Click to expand...
Yeah "natural forms of sugar" being processed sugar. I don't know why you're unable to wrap your head around what I'm saying: taking compounds out of their natural sources which we evolved to consume, refining them and then consuming them at concentrations orders of magnitude higher than what we evolved to consume fucks you up. This is as true for HFCS as it is for sucrose as it is for seed oils as it is for LDL as it is for cocaine.

You're so latched onto HFCS and ratios that I genuinely can't tell if you're doing that thing where you're being pedantic to amuse yourself or it you're actually illiterate.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back