Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a man? - aka Debate user doodoocaca on the validity of rape victims

[Moths]

Is the bear a leather daddy?

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Hopefully women & bears can make a great miltary force. Because there's no way no sane man will protect a country that hates them & believes a bear is less dangerous than them.

 

[redcent]

Heyyyy.. Here's a thing I don't get...

When a woman says all men are dangerous because of a select few it's kind of insulting, right? And that's fine...


But then guys are looking up e-thots and.. Some "choke... Me.. daddy" fetish suddenly all women are like that or have to have responsibility for that few degenerates...

All I am saying neither group is better than the other. You're all equally whacked and deserve each other and I hope you all drive each other insane.

I want to at least try to be better than the lot of you. Difficult considering you all consist of bear bile, but I'm going to try.

 

[Dyn]

Heyyyy.. Here's a thing I don't get...

When a woman says all men are dangerous because of a select few it's kind of insulting, right? And that's fine...


But then guys are looking up e-thots and.. Some "choke... Me.. daddy" fetish suddenly all women are like that or have to have responsibility for that few degenerates...

How do you not get it?

All men are dangerous because of a select few because nobody can know who the select few are until it's too late. Playing Russian Roulette is dangerous because of a select few bullets in the gun. It doesn't mean every man is a rapist or every chamber is loaded.

 

[Doctor Socrates]

Women who pick bear should be put in cage like this btw

 

[Drip Torch]

Depends on what bear species it is. Black bears are chill if you dont mess with them, from my experience they usually wont come near. No experience, thank God, with brown bears so still best to avoid them. Not a great feeling to realize that poo you stepped in belongs to a bear, and its fresh. Bubba Landowner is a great deal trickier to manage, especially when there is alcohol, guns and fire involved.

 

[Dieter Laser]

This is the dumbest trend ever.

Suddenly all these leftist whores are bragging about how crime statistics say they are correct, yet

1) their statistics aren’t remotely correct as it doesn’t take into account the number of times you’ll encounter a bear
2) if you go by statistics for violent crime you’re a crazy racist
3) they don’t grasp that the same argument can be made for trannies now too

Foids gonna foid.

I’d pick the bear over these danger haired sjw thots, half of them probably got dicks anyway.

 

[Drain Todger]

The question is kind of ridiculous, since there is no such thing as a monolithic bear, just as there is no such thing as a monolithic man. Different species of bear present different levels of danger. A little Asiatic bear or black bear will probably run away from you if you appear threatening enough. A brown bear, grizzly, or polar bear? Holy shit. You are in immediate, life-threatening danger at the very onset of the encounter.

Men are also on a sliding scale, but with a range that goes far above and far below the bear for the level of danger. The vast majority of men you encounter on a trail are just there to enjoy the outdoors, not to savage passers-by. However, you never know when maybe that hundredth guy you encounter is some Ted Bundy-type freak who's going to drag you away and spend the next eight hours raping you face-down in a drainage ditch and then stitch together a cock cozy out of your eyelids or some shit.

Humans are objectively the more deadly predator than bears because of tool use. A guy could pop half a dozen charging bears with a rifle without breaking a sweat if he had enough of a head start, and if they close the distance, well, he could draw a great big fighting knife and put some gaping holes in them before he gets his neck bitten and goes down. That is, of course, not the absolute limit of the danger presented by humans to other humans or to wildlife; the upper limit of the damage a single human can do looks something like a manned fighter jet armed with a tactical nuclear warhead, but nobody's going to bomb a random forest with you in it for no reason, so we can obviously exclude this scenario. Make no mistake, humans absolutely do have the potential to be extremely dangerous, to other species and to our own. However, we are also a social species and generally don't prey on our own kind.

Statistically speaking, the man is preferable to the bear, because more likely than not, he's going to be an unarmed, low-T, Prius-driving liberal with a bald spot on top who's out on the trail to photograph scenery with his Nikon, not to pin down and rape random women. Even when you take into account violent crime statistics, in the vast majority of encounters with any human, you are not in any danger, because you're also human. However, there is also a risk of encountering the occasional, uber-rare psychopath or serial killer who has picked you as his next victim.

In any encounter with a bear, there is always a moderate level of danger that varies slightly depending on the species. A bear always regards you as either a threat or food.

 

[ITK]

We need to know the race of the man before we can answer. I would rather have a daughter be stuck in a forest with bear than a nigger.

 

[Hatter]

The entire "man or the bear" arguement is completely retarded because it bases itself around the statistics of woman being killed by men for being a woman vs woman killed by bears.
It completely falls apart when you realize that there is probably less than a million bears on this planet and %99.999 of woman aren't around them all the time.