Would You Support Mandatory Circumcision For All Males?

Should circumcision be mandatory?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 33.3%

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 3.0%

  • Please take my foreskin

    Votes: 21 63.6%
  • Total voters
    33
I support cutting the breasts off of women to prevent breast cancer. Also, all men should be castrated to prevent testicular cancer
 
Quit trying to override my fucking ideology. This is about foreskin!
 
Sure, why not, women seem to really prefer it, so why not have better dicks for all?

zzzCanada.jpg
From a study in Canada in 2015, where most of the women had pretty equal exposure to both types of dudes and they were basically 50/50 in what their relationships currently were. Mean age was like 26 or something. Having damn near twice a desirability as uncut/no preference combined is pretty hard to argue.

ProTip (or no tip, I guess): You can piss off a lot of people with this image.
 
The Fool said:
Quit trying to override my fucking ideology. This is about foreskin!
Click to expand...
yeah yeah we all know you get off on the idea of lopping off foreskins, now let us talk about labiaplasties in peace.
 
Cut the whole dick off at birth and turn AMAB babies into trannies. Why wait until they are toddlers?
 
Synth said:
Sure, why not, women seem to really prefer it, so why not have better dicks for all?
Click to expand...
I can't find that study. Link it?
Edit: nevermind, I think I found it:

A study of less than 200 people.


It also asked them to compare the two, leading a whole host of cultural influence to the study.



There was a large study in Denmark that showed the opposite. Sex without condom with intact men was rated about 15% higher on enjoyment.

Who would have thought that having a bodypart evolved to prevent female lubrication from being scooped out would affect female enjoyment?

IMG_20201229_221420.png


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark - PubMed

Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VIVIIXI
Lemmingwise said:
I can't find that study. Link it?

There was a large study in Denmark that showed the opposite. Sex without condom with intact men was rated about 15% higher on enjoyment.

Who would have thought that having a bodypart evolved to prevent female lubrication from being scooped out would affect female enjoyment?

View attachment 1816764

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark - PubMed

Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Click to expand...

I've read that one and it was criticized by more than a few places because of the low return rate of the surveys and the author was very anti-circumcision. The Canadian one wasn't really biased in any way by the authors (I think they were all women, actually), had a high return rate, and the women involved had pretty equal exposure to both types of dudes, and in terms of what type of man they were currently in a relationship with, it was about 55/45 in favor of cut, and they overwhelmingly prefered circumcised men, so take it for what you will. I mean, even in the "total preference" thing, less women preferred uncut dudes than women who had only been with them -- like half of them had no preference.

I meant to post this as a joke, not get into a debate, but I see that posting that did indeed make at least one person mad.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Lemmingwise
Lemmingwise said:
Oh then they can't possibly be biased.
Click to expand...

Well, you're much less likely to find female extremists when it comes to this topic. It usually turns into a retarded slapfight between men, kinda like right now. It's obviously a joke topic, I posted an obvious joke response, and now we're here.
 
Synth said:
Well, you're much less likely to find female extremists when it comes to this topic. It usually turns into a retarded slapfight between men, kinda like right now. It's obviously a joke topic, I posted an obvious joke response, and now we're here.
Click to expand...
I agree. For the same reason men are more equipped to discuss abortion than women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VIVIIXI
Lemmingwise said:
I agree. For the same reason men are more equipped to discuss abortion than women.
Click to expand...

Sure. I like how at the bottom of the image you posted that "more thorough investigation where it's more common is warranted" is stated, and in the Canadian study where's it's more common, but still less than half, contradicts it. And I'm pretty sure that Danish one was 2012, the Canadian one was 2015, so it was even done afterwards. Clearly women prefer cut dudes, so we should obviously make circumcision mandatory.
 
Synth said:
Sure. I like how at the bottom of the image you posted that "more thorough investigation where it's more common is warranted" is stated, and in the Canadian study where's it's more common, but still less than half, contradicts it. And I'm pretty sure that Danish one was 2012, the Canadian one was 2015, so it was even done afterwards. Clearly women prefer cut dudes, so we should obviously make circumcision mandatory.
Click to expand...

Yes, the study of 5500 people needed just 180 more canadians to throw out the old result, lol.

You know, what let's do it. But let's not half arse it. Let's circumcise everyone. Let's recircumcise those that already have been. We can make everyone even cleaner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back