wtf is wrong with chinks?

[comfysocks]

Nice try trying to honey trap me glowniggers, at least try to figure out what kind of men I'm attracted to and stop trying so hard. Anyways, wtf is wrong with chinks? I would like to preface that, I have an immense hatred of the Chinese government and I apologize if I'm borderline fedposting, but I can't figure it out. If my neighbors were suffering in Shanghai, I would zerg rush the nearest government facility. If I were trapped and starving in my apartment in Shanghai, I would be using a proxy to figure out how to build a crossbow on the internet, reading The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, reading up on how to build a battering ram or seeing if I had some sort of chemicals that could dissolve metal. There's like 2039482309 billion of them, just zerg rush. You don't need to fear the first death, it's the second one that you need to worry about.

I get it, they punish your family if you misbehave, but so what? There's only like 12 of them and there are BILLIONS of you. "The Immortals" my ass. Those stupid commies died, didn't they? Seriously, take a hint from the Italians. Hide out in some skull encrusted tunnels until you can finally hang Xi Jingpin upside down and take fucking pictures of it! You can throw off your shit government because you have GOD GIVEN rights and they are abusing them. FUCK their SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE. After you 1776 your regime, just put in freedom of speech or some shit.

I apologize for fedposting, but I am subject to some bullshit FISA orders that I don't want to talk about. It it my belief as a burgernigger that I am allowed to use my freedom of speech for calling out the chinks. Feel free to delete this if I'm being retarded. Also, I know that Russians are tundraniggers but what kinda niggers are Ukranians?

 

[millais]

steppeniggers

 

[Drkinferno72]

Genghis Khan shouldvr finished the job

 

[b0x]

You seem to have a hatred for Chinese Government. The population is almost completely disconnected.

 

[Narutard]

Asians are still very tribalistic. They don’t do rights, they have duties and obligations instead.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

Westerns don't seem to realise that "freedom" is not seen the same way elsewhere in the world. In fact, the notion that freedom means individual autonomy against the herd is less than two hundred years old.

"Liberty", even in the ancient Western world did not mean a right to be bon vivant. "Libertas" as recorded in the Early Republic of Rome was a duty, and the capacity to cultivate and practice a virtuous life. Liberty came with responsibility, it was a burden the upper classes saw themselves as having to bear as they whipped the wild feral mob of the unwashed masses into something resembling civility.

Freedom, freedom from all ties of clan, kin, ancestors, Gods and country is not a good in Asia in particular. The lone wolf dies, but the borg thrives. The whole can survive what the individual cannot. And to ensure the Leviathan to borrow from Hobbes is healthy, be it a political, secular or religious one places a heavy tax on individuals.

I find with few exceptions such as nations with very strong clan tendencies like Ireland the decendant generations of those who live in the western world have no group loyalties of note unless like in Ukraine they face a common threat to their individual autonomy.

On one hand, I can see the the Origins of this. If we accept Greece as the cradle of Western civilisation hundreds of wild and varied societies achieved incredible things and triumphed over vastly more powerful foes. However, imagine what they could have done as one. China during the century of humiliation may have been weak, it may have been stagnant for centuries but when the Mandarins were producing fine art on parchment in vast developed urban metropolises with things like sewer systems and universal meritocratic exams and class mobility Europeans were still shitting in the streets living in wooden shacks freaking out about heresy and blasphemy. And this is long before the Jewish carpenter and an Arab epileptic threw everything up into the air.

There could be a balance of both. China created a stable environment and was for millenia the most advanced society in the world, but it became stagnant and rarely risked breaking with expectation. Westerners funnily enough have usually had the opposite problem. Everything changes far too much and the house often collapses because successive generations can never rally behind it long enough to achieve something that stands the test of time. Of course there are old things like the Christian faith, but the oldest continuous political and religious institutions on earth are not Western; they're almost exclusively Asian. And usually far Eastern and heavily influenced by confucianism.

Rights are ultimately a luxury, an expectation of the state, family or cult that can place a drain on resources or prevent efficiency. It can also provide a support system that facilitates ingenuity, but also just the freedom to fuck around and distract from the furtherment of the group.

The Chinese might hate the Communist Party too, most don't. It may be a vehicle of tyrrany but no moreso than any other previous leaders. If anything infinitely less so and it has brought them into the prosperity they enjoy today. While there are signs of weakness like the housing crisis, people still know not to fuck with the power that's steering them into returning to their position as one of if not the world's most powerful state. Sure its oppressive, but it's hard to argue that it doesn't work. It clearly does.

 

[milk]

Westerns don't seem to realise that "freedom" is not seen the same way elsewhere in the world. In fact, the notion that freedom means individual autonomy against the herd is less than two hundred years old.

"Liberty", even in the ancient Western world did not mean a right to be bon vivant. "Libertas" as recorded in the Early Republic of Rome was a duty, and the capacity to cultivate and practice a virtuous life. Liberty came with responsibility, it was a burden the upper classes saw themselves as having to bear as they whipped the wild feral mob of the unwashed masses into something resembling civility.

Freedom, freedom from all ties of clan, kin, ancestors, Gods and country is not a good in Asia in particular. The lone wolf dies, but the borg thrives. The whole can survive what the individual cannot. And to ensure the Leviathan to borrow from Hobbes is healthy, be it a political, secular or religious one places a heavy tax on individuals.

I find with few exceptions such as nations with very strong clan tendencies like Ireland the decendant generations of those who live in the western world have no group loyalties of note unless like in Ukraine they face a common threat to their individual autonomy.

On one hand, I can see the the Origins of this. If we accept Greece as the cradle of Western civilisation hundreds of wild and varied societies achieved incredible things and triumphed over vastly more powerful foes. However, imagine what they could have done as one. China during the century of humiliation may have been weak, it may have been stagnant for centuries but when the Mandarins were producing fine art on parchment in vast developed urban metropolises with things like sewer systems and universal meritocratic exams and class mobility Europeans were still shitting in the streets living in wooden shacks freaking out about heresy and blasphemy. And this is long before the Jewish carpenter and an Arab epileptic threw everything up into the air.

There could be a balance of both. China created a stable environment and was for millenia the most advanced society in the world, but it became stagnant and rarely risked breaking with expectation. Westerners funnily enough have historicallt had the opposite problem. Everything changes far too much and the house often collapses because successive generations can never rally behind it long enough to achieve something that stands the test of time. Of course there are old things like the Christian faith, but the oldest continuous political and religious institutions on earth are not Western; they're almost exclusively Asian. And usually far Eastern and heavily influenced by confucianism.

Rights are ultimately a luxury, an expectation of the state, family or cult that can place a drain on resources or prevent efficiency. It can also provide a support system that facilitates ingenuity, but also just the freedom to fuck around and distract from the furtherment of the group.

The so called "Century of Humiliation" is communist propaganda. This period they were ruled by the Qing Dynasty (Manchu), they were not Chinese. The first rulers didn't know how to speak any Chinese. The Chinese people were a slave race since the fall of the Ming Dynasty. It was the colonial powers, most notably Japan, Germany, and then later the USA that helped kick start the Chinese revolution to overthrow the Qing Dynasty, and return it to Han Chinese rule (Nationalist Forces).

TLDR: Century of Humiliation is communist propaganda, in reality this time period is the colonial powers helping China free itself from it's Manchu slave masters, ending 300 years of Manchu enslavement.

 

[WULULULULU]

Asians are still very tribalistic. They don’t do rights, they have duties and obligations instead.

And thus is why Asians in general are niggercattle before niggers even became a reality.

 

[Lemmingwise]

The Chinese might hate the Communist Party too, most don't

Who knows what the chinese really think when there is a social credit system and critical bloggers disappear all the time never to be seen again?

Who knows what westerners really think when rightwingers get removed from youtube and even tiny spic catboys get put on no fly lists, and even apolitical cow forums are pushed further and further towards nonexistance?

Westerns don't seem to realise that "freedom" is not seen the same way elsewhere in the world. In fact, the notion that freedom means individual autonomy against the herd is less than two hundred years old.

The fundamental yearning for freedom simply isn't comparable in to how other races conceptualise the ideal way to live.

In Chinese thought it seems to be something like divine harmony, which means being the perfect little cog in a larger machine when viewed through white man's eyes.

In Jewish thought it seems to be something like making sure the others are toiling so you can feast. In some sense, making sure others are the perfect little cog in your machine. It's easy to see why they like their control of china so much.

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

The so called "Century of Humiliation" is communist propaganda. This period they were ruled by the Qing Dynasty (Manchu), they were not Chinese they. The first rulers didn't know how to speak any Chinese. The Chinese people were a slave race since the fall of the Ming Dynasty. It was the colonial powers, most notably Japan, Germany, and then later the USA that helped kick start the Chinese revolution to overthrow the Qing Dynasty, and return it to Han Chinese rule (Nationalist Forces).

TLDR: Century of Humiliation is communist propaganda, in reality this time period is the colonial powers helping China free itself from it's Manchu slave masters.

I appreciate that. However, I was addressing why the Communist Party isn't struggling with people seriously trying to dismantle it.

Also, the Manchus were not native Han Chinese that's true. However, like many dynasties before them they adopted Chinese characteristics and thus they were tolerated. Moreso than tolerated, because while its hard to imagine them as not being extravagant they were very frugal and restrained compared to previous dynasties like the Ming. Which should tell you the level of their excesses.

Sometimes the truth matters less than what people belive to be true. For instance, OP seems to belive that Americans are a free people. As a Asian/European third generation migrant; I find it hard to see a people without health care, as strong employment rights, living in a bizarre Ayn Rand but wokelib Libertarian Capitalist "Worship the troons" society as being free. And yet they believe they are the same way they tend to lament Europeans as being "cucked" or ultra liberal communists when in actuality with a "federal level" ban on gay marriage and wokelib shit, economic protectionist policies and a "Fuck everyone but us and our orbiters" policy even the most liberal EU states are in several ways far more economically and socially Conservative than any of the Republican powerbases.

Perspective and indeed propaganda is more important than truth in these discussions.

 

[DumbDude42]

If my neighbors were suffering in Shanghai, I would zerg rush the nearest government facility. If I were trapped and starving in my apartment in Shanghai, I would be using a proxy to figure out how to build a crossbow on the internet

no you wouldn't. you would sit in your pod and do exactly as daddy xi commands.

 

[Lemmingwise]

I appreciate that. However, I was addressing why the Communist Party isn't struggling with people seriously trying to dismantle it.

Also, the Manchus were not native Han Chinese that's true. However, like many dynasties before them they adopted Chinese characteristics and thus they were tolerated. Moreso than tolerated, because while its hard to imagine them as not being extravagant they were very frugal and restrained compared to previous dynasties like the Ming. Which should tell you the level of their excesses.

Sometimes the truth matters less than what people belive to be true. For instance, OP seems to belive that Americans are a free people. As a Asian/European third generation migrant; I find it hard to see a people without health care, as strong employment rights, living in a bizarre Ayn Rand but wokelib Libertarian Capitalist "Worship the troons" society as being free. And yet they believe they are the same way they tend to lament Europeans as being "cucked" or ultra liberal communists when in actuality with a "federal level" ban on gay marriage and wokelib shit, economic protectionist policies and a "Fuck everyone but us and our orbiters" policy even the most liberal EU states are in several ways far more economically and socially Conservative than any of the Republican powerbases.

Perspective and indeed propaganda is more important than truth in these discussions.

Thoughtfully argued, but you'll be hard pressed to get many westerners to agree that truth is secondary, even if a percentage of them themselves have a poor grasp on it.

 

[Corpun]

It's a mix of commie brainwashing and the fact most Chinese mainlanders are unwashed peasants or their children.

This is why you see so many liveleak videos of them in industrial accidents or dying on roads and everyone ignores them. Apparently if you take someone to a hospital in China you are paying the bills, so everyone just ignores people who suffered massive injuries from a car or brick.

They are also fine with cheating everything apparently with this attitude, because they are inclined to believe they themselves will be cheated anyways, so why not. This is apparently why their construction material is so shitty, material makers just shortchanged everyone by using shitty material.

As for the general tardism you see of people walking right into elevator shafts? Most Chinese cities are inhabited by peasants who spent their whole lifes on farms, before illegally leaving the farms for the cities, because China criminalized internal migration. These people have never seen modern cities and end up dying stupid ways like this, especially when you factor in awful Chinese manufacturing of elevators and escalators and shit.

 

[YourFriendlyLurker]

It's a hive. I'm not sure humans are supposed to function like that.

 

[Beautiful Border]

If my neighbors were suffering in Shanghai, I would zerg rush the nearest government facility. If I were trapped and starving in my apartment in Shanghai, I would zerg rush the nearest government facility. If I were trapped and starving in my apartment in Shanghai, I would be using a proxy to figure out how to build a crossbow on the internet, reading The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, reading up on how to build a battering ram or seeing if I had some sort of chemicals that could dissolve metal.

No you wouldn't. Stop talking shit.