Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

To paraphrase Clint Eastwood aka "Dirty Harry" Callahan in Magnum Force: ""A man's got to know his limitations" and this is what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla should know. With all these billions my dear Albert Bourla, isn't enough for you. Are you "moneyholic", "profitholic" or "powerholic"?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Lichen Bark
To paraphrase Clint Eastwood aka "Dirty Harry" Callahan in Magnum Force: ""A man's got to know his limitations" and this is what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla should know. With all these billions my dear Albert Bourla, isn't enough for you. Are you "moneyholic", "profitholic" or "powerholic"?
People like him are the reason nobody likes big phrama at all
 
Um guys? Does this mean anything?

Screenshot Bourla site https __kiwifarms.net.pngScreenshot__kiwifarms.net at DuckDuckGo.pngScreenshot__kiwifarms.net - Google Search.pngasfdasfd.JPG
 
The problem with modern science is that scientists routinely forget that reality is connected at every level. Ignoring quantum effects leads to information fall-off at every subsequent level, as does ignoring the atomic, molecular, etc. At some point, even our best and brightest thinkers appear to have forgotten a mental shortcut is still a fucking shortcut- your theories and projections will be wanting or incomplete accordingly.
You're certainly correct with this, but I think there should be something pointed out.
Back in the Renaissance and such, science was much smaller, thus it was far easier to find yourself in a position where you genuinely know everything that is known at the time (hence the term of "Renaissance Man". As years went by and especially post-WW2, science has gotten to such a point where doing exactly that is practically impossible.

Though, I'd say this isn't really the root of the problem, what I think is the problem is people took a look at that problem and went "let's go way into specialization instead" and so you get researchers so hilariously specialized in a topic they struggle like hell in any other topic even if it may have some tangential relationship to what they know, it's tunnel vision really.
Quite a lot of topics nowadays need researchers who are obviously extremely good at that one particular field, and then good working knowledge of quite a few other related fields. "Good" obviously isn't world-class but it's enough to draw ideas and intuition from, that's what is really needed in my opinion. I'm pretty shit at physics but my chemistry has been picking up a lot recently for work, which required reading into binding interactions, as an example.

I think this issue over the past few years have started to be addressed with the early career researchers coming up due to the rise of bioinformatics and the like. It's easier (and much less expensive in general) to have one of your researchers able to code-monkey some/most of the informatics work and so desire for more broadly-educated candidates has massively picked up.
However, covid amusingly enough fucked education for a few years so instead you have this gap of around 10-15 years of people who seriously know their shit, then on one side people too specialized or too old (there are exceptions of course, on this side), and on the other you have people failing exams where the answers were practically given to them (not exaggerating that one).

Back on topic, I'm aware a fair few people on this like to trawl for papers, I'm actually personally interested in papers focusing on the lipid nanoparticle part of the vaccines if there are any? I can take a good look at them whenever I'm not getting swamped with work.
 
Statistically, what are the chances of the USA punting the requirement for non resident travellers to the country to be vaccinated?
Here's the text from the proclamation responsible
Sec. 5. Termination. This proclamation shall remain in effect until terminated by the President. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall, as circumstances warrant and no more than 60 days after the date of this proclamation and by the final day of each calendar month thereafter, recommend whether the President should continue, modify, or terminate this proclamation.
If the Science™ changes then... maybe?
 
An embalmer by the name of Richard Hirschman keeps seeing these bizarre clots. More info:





Spike attacks the vascular endothelium and occasionally triggers severe clotting in COVID-19 infection. I'm not at all surprised that it can do the same thing when produced by cells exposed to the gene transfection therapy that's in these vaccines.
Fascinating
Thanks I've got reading to now. Seriously that video was something esle never seen a blood clot like it
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Drain Todger
Weird, I have definitely experienced some odd shit with duck duck go about a year ago, they progressively shrunk my search results at one point, not sure why. I know I brought this up in the old thread. I ran the query and everything seems ok at least from my end. Maybe it has something to do with your geographic location?
1652145809821.png

1652145845542.png

1652145884716.png

1652145925225.png
Very odd. For what it's worth, DDG uses Bing, and Bing does deliver results for other topics on Kiwi Farms again (after previously delisting the site over some pissed off tranny complaint).
Can confirm, Duck Duck Go reporting 30 results, and Bing also reporting 30 results, the most results of any search engine for me. The others seem to be limiting things.
Using the Xenforo search feature I see ~59 results total for "bourla." These modern engines aren't performing very well.
 
Weird, I have definitely experienced some odd shit with duck duck go about a year ago, they progressively shrunk my search results at one point, not sure why. I know I brought this up in the old thread. I ran the query and everything seems ok at least from my end. Maybe it has something to do with your geographic location?

Can confirm, Duck Duck Go reporting 30 results, and Bing also reporting 30 results, the most results of any search engine for me. The others seem to be limiting things.
Using the Xenforo search feature I see ~59 results total for "bourla." These modern engines aren't performing very well.
That's a nice cup of paranoia to wake up in the morning.
 
Perhaps it's already posted but it's worth to repeat while lots of Fraudci's disciples will scream "fake news, disinformation" when they'll see that article.

An estimated $350 million in undisclosed royalties were paid to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and hundreds of its scientists, including the agency’s recently departed director, Dr. Francis Collins, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, according to a nonprofit government watchdog.

“We estimate that up to $350 million in royalties from third parties were paid to NIH scientists during the fiscal years between 2010 and 2020,” Open the Books CEO Adam Andrzejewski told reporters in a telephone news conference on May 9.

“We draw that conclusion because, in the first five years, there has been $134 million that we have been able to quantify of top-line numbers that flowed from third-party payers, meaning pharmaceutical companies or other payers, to NIH scientists.”

The first five years, from 2010 to 2014, constitute 40 percent of the total, he said.

“We now know that there are 1,675 scientists that received payments during that period, at least one payment. In fiscal year 2014, for instance, $36 million was paid out and that is on average $21,100 per scientist,” Andrzejewski said.

“We also find that during this period, leadership at NIH was involved in receiving third-party payments. For instance, Francis Collins, the immediate past director of NIH, received 14 payments. Dr. Anthony Fauci received 23 payments and his deputy, Clifford Lane, received eight payments.”

Collins resigned as NIH director in December 2021 after 12 years of leading the world’s largest public health agency. Fauci is the longtime head of NIH’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), as well as chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden. Lane is the deputy director of NIAID, under Fauci.
 
To paraphrase Clint Eastwood aka "Dirty Harry" Callahan in Magnum Force: ""A man's got to know his limitations" and this is what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla should know. With all these billions my dear Albert Bourla, isn't enough for you. Are you "moneyholic", "profitholic" or "powerholic"?
"The very existence of powerful industrialists in our society necessitates the fear that one day there will be no more foreign markets for them to conquer, that one day ten trillion (dollars) and fifteen trillion (dollars) will look no different in their eyes. It should have been obvious to those who could stand against them that their final horizon is complete and utter control. By now it may be too late."
 
By the way, Steve Kirsch recently did a risk/benefit analysis of the vaccines per age group:


https___bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_2f938b85...png

What he claims is that the risk/benefit ratio is bad for everyone, even people in their late seventies. Also, the "vaccine" would kill 1600 in the 10-14 age group for every one that it saves from the virus.


Looks like they already protect the back of that SOB Bourla.
This is fraud. It doesn't matter how many legal exemptions you're given. You can't deliver a poison and call it a vaccine.


DR. BOURLA: It was counterintuitive because Pfizer was mustering on the table, had very good experience and expertise with multiple technologies that could give a vaccine, and the Novartis that some of the vaccines are, we were very good in doing that. Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that and plus many other technologies.

mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.

They felt that the two years of work on mRNA since 2018 together with BioNTech to develop the flu vaccine made them believe that the technology is mature and we are at the cusp of delivering a product. So they convinced me. I followed my instinct that they know what they are saying. They are very good, and we made this very difficult decision at that time.
 
Fascinating
Thanks I've got reading to now. Seriously that video was something esle never seen a blood clot like it
I have, once. My brother took part in a drug testing trial some years ago. Part of the trial required a cannula to be kept in his arm for a long period. For some reason, it caused a clot to form along the vein it was in, almost from his elbow to his shoulder. Not a full clot, because blood was still flowing in the vein, but enough to be visible from the surface. He reported it to the nurses and they removed his canula, then he told me how he pulled the entire length of the clot out. He sent me a picture of it. I'd post if I still had it, but that was back when cameras were still a bit of a novelty on phones. It looked the same as the clots in the images. I've no idea of the mechanism involved.
 
Back