Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

Perun said:
intentionally. The average person did not believe they were harming others like they try to say in that experiment. They thought they were doing good. People are easy to deceive and manipulate, they are not generally trying to hurt others.
Click to expand...
I'll try to take comfort in that when getting stomped to death by the eternal boot of the niggercattle for not considering child mutilation stunning & brave.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: derpherp2, GunCar Gary, GloJojo and 1 other person
The Punished Mitch said:
I'll try to take comfort in that when getting stomped to death by the eternal boot of the niggercattle for not considering child mutilation stunning & brave.
Click to expand...
I don't see them defending any pro-tranny, pro-vax, or child mutilation via HRT and surgeries by critcizing a study and saying "yes, people ARE easy to deceive and manipulate". You good there, moid? Is there something upsetting you and you'd like to get your feelings out? Uh oh! Niggercattle's a-knockin', hope you're armed (vent yourself with it though, you walking XY defect).
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: coof coof, derpherp2 and The Punished Mitch
oh no no no.....
vaccinated sdfs.png
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: coof coof, PureP, Bananadana and 29 others
Many of the experts who warned about the clotshots said iirc deaths would start to rise from it after 2 to 3 years. We're at that point, and deaths are rising.

I would dig up the discussion from the previous thread, but am lazy. Something about original sin, lack of ability to fight viruses from cd8 cells? and a few other mechanisms that take time to manifest.

Animal models from previous mRNA based vaccine trials showed deaths at 3-6 months ish that translated into 2-3 years for humans. I forget the details, someone summon the train dodger.

I'm just watching this shitshow from the sidelines. Pureblood here with a strong will not comply attitude.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Netizennameless, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL, Exterminatus and 9 others
There's a reasonable chance of none of them going anywhere, but has anyone here looked at the design concepts for any of the US "Project Next Gen" vaccines? Some of the concepts are interesting, and potentially not in a good way. The first thing is, some of the concepts are not going to be mRNA or viral vector. The main goals of many of the concepts are nasal/mucosal immunity, so it's likely the vaccine would be administered into the nose, as well as enhanced durability. Administering a viral vector or mRNA vaccine into the nose probably would not help with enhanced durability, so one combination of concepts is to use a very extended release time substance filled with nucleocapsid and various engineered spike proteins, potentially assembled as a virus-like nanoparticle, floret like cluster, or a protein display particle. The goal would be to release the antigens as slowly and consistently as possible, archiving enhanced durability almost solely by the extended release, e.g. if you got the release time extended to 7 months, the vaccine would last for 7 months + 2 weeks more or less. A similar idea was tested in mice, though without nasal administration, and achieved much, much higher antibody levels than a single "normal" (non-slow release) vaccine dose. The problem is, with 7 month durability and yearly administration, you would essentially be getting vaccinated every single minute of every single hour of every single day, for over half the days you have left in your life. There's obviously no precedent for that in humans.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Bananadana, Aurelianus, Kane Lives and 1 other person
spaztocate9000 said:
Something about original sin
Click to expand...

Antigenic Original Sin.
The immune system trains to fight a specific strain, but if a virus is particularly prone to mutation, it develops new strains quickly.
Antibodies trained to fight one strain will be less (or in rare cases in)effective against others.
And it tends to be "stuck" that way.

How this functions with Influenza:
Each generation trains immunity to a to the first strain they encounter, and their immune response is blunted against other strains to varying degrees.
For each strain that circles the globe each year, a significant proportion of populace (representing 1 or more generations) carries significant immunity.
Because this immunity is generational, rather than uniform, the herd has greater resilience against catastrophic pandemic.

Now...
The vax has caused uniform (rather than generation-segmented) immune response to the INITIAL strain among vast numbers of the population.
Guess what happens with each iterative mutation further away from that strain?
(the "unvaccinated" are going to save us from another massive pandemic)

This is why, with diseases with super-low mortality like WUHAN virus or the flu, you don't push vaxes on people that are below 65 years old. Better for them to get sick and fight it for the sake of stronger overall herd immunity.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: autistic dog, Lady Round Buns, Exterminatus and 5 others
RE: The Milgram experiment:

"We know it was a bad test because afterwards the subjects who electrocuted people to death said they knew they were doing it".

Yeah. They still did it though, knowingly or not. Bullied into it or not, they still electrocuted people.

And, where's the evidence that the people who 'knew' it was an experiment actually said "this is fake", rather than them feeling fucking stupid for falling for tactics that led them to kill another person?

Which is what we're seeing with the vax-regret now. "We knew the vax was rushed, we knew there would be side effects but it was the best course of action".

Any attempts to prove Hawthorne, Milgrim and Stanford wrong or unreliable, prove how correct and reliable it really is. "No, no, it didn't happen under THAT circumstance, it only happened under THIS circumstance"
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: coof coof, CrentistMcMahon, Forbidden Existence and 2 others
People don't like realizing they'd be concentration camp guards.
The post-experimental "cope" likely got stronger and stronger the more widely it became known to the public.
 
Bog-standard Poster said:
RE: The Milgram experiment:

"We know it was a bad test because afterwards the subjects who electrocuted people to death said they knew they were doing it".

Yeah. They still did it though, knowingly or not. Bullied into it or not, they still electrocuted people.

And, where's the evidence that the people who 'knew' it was an experiment actually said "this is fake", rather than them feeling fucking stupid for falling for tactics that led them to kill another person?

Which is what we're seeing with the vax-regret now. "We knew the vax was rushed, we knew there would be side effects but it was the best course of action".

Any attempts to prove Hawthorne, Milgrim and Stanford wrong or unreliable, prove how correct and reliable it really is. "No, no, it didn't happen under THAT circumstance, it only happened under THIS circumstance"
Click to expand...
The people "electrocuted" were actors, they weren't hurt. No one got killed. Really it's not that hard to find something that does support your views that doesn't have a ton of controversy around it with how poorly it was done.

dustbuster said:
People don't like realizing they'd be concentration camp guards.
The post-experimental "cope" likely got stronger and stronger the more widely it became known to the public.
Click to expand...
oh my bad i didn't realize you guys fell for the holocaust too, carry on then, these studies are in fact great proof we would all gas the jews with a little pressure, you can run the masturbation machine.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: CraicRock28 and Foreverial
Reupped on my NAC (it's good for you anyway), gonna have to get more tests as I threw the last few of mine away a while ago. Only reason I want some is so I can break out the trusty colored pencils again and fake me a weeks' paid vacation.

eta: apparently bronny james (I guess a kid of LeBron or some niggerball shit) has "a congenital heart" issue lmao. Seems a lot of athletes are experiencing heart problems as of late.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bananadana, SirCliveSinclairdabbing, indomitable snowman and 1 other person
Probably tin foil hat moment but that nicotine/ace2 link is that still a valid way of blocking the virus attaching?
I'm fine with using nicotine lozengers and I keep plenty of ivermectin and nac/c/d/zinc in stock for when things are ramping up.
 
spaztocate9000 said:
Many of the experts who warned about the clotshots said iirc deaths would start to rise from it after 2 to 3 years. We're at that point, and deaths are rising.

I would dig up the discussion from the previous thread, but am lazy. Something about original sin, lack of ability to fight viruses from cd8 cells? and a few other mechanisms that take time to manifest.

Animal models from previous mRNA based vaccine trials showed deaths at 3-6 months ish that translated into 2-3 years for humans. I forget the details, someone summon the train dodger.

I'm just watching this shitshow from the sidelines. Pureblood here with a strong will not comply attitude.
Click to expand...
guess no one read my post, but it was supposed to be something insane like 10% of people that got the shot die by year 2 (which is right now) and 50% by year 5. IIRC its more like .25% increase in deaths above the norm currently. There was also talk about the vax being able to be sexually transmitted through sex.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Sebastian Bacchanalia
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back