WWE in talks with state gambling regulators to legalize betting on scripted match results - Probably not that different than 'real' sports when it comes to being fixed for gambling..

Article } Archive

KEY POINTS
  • WWE has held discussions with state gambling regulators in Colorado and Michigan to legalize betting on scripted match results, sources said.
  • WWE is working with EY, commonly known as Ernst & Young, to secure match results so they won’t leak to the public.
  • WWE creative executives don’t plan to inform wrestlers who will win until hours before a match.
  • WWE aims to have major sports betting companies offer bets on high-profile matches.
WWE is in talks with state gambling regulators in Colorado and Michigan to legalize betting on high-profile matches, according to people familiar with the matter.
WWE is working with the accounting firm EY to secure scripted match results in hopes it will convince regulators there’s no chance of results leaking to the public, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. Accounting firms PwC and EY, also known as Ernst & Young, have historically worked with award shows, including the Academy Awards and the Emmys, to keep results a secret.

Betting on the Academy Awards is already legal and available through some sports betting applications, including market leaders FanDuel and DraftKings, although most states don’t allow it. WWE executives have cited Oscars betting as a template to convince regulators gambling on scripted matches is safe, the people said.
Still, while Academy Awards voting results are known by a select few before they’re announced publicly, they aren’t scripted by writers. Even if regulators allow gambling, betting companies would have to decide if they’re willing to place odds on WWE matches even if it’s legalized. Those discussions have yet to occur at betting firms, according to people familiar with the matter.
A WWE spokesperson declined to comment. A spokesperson for EY couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
According to a Michigan gaming spokesperson, the Michigan Gaming Control Board publishes a Sports Wagering Catalog. When updates to the catalog are approved, the information is shared publicly through the agency’s website and with sportsbook operators.
The Colorado Division of Gaming told CNBC it is not currently considering and has not considered allowing sports betting wagers on WWE matches. A spokesperson noted Colorado currently has a statute prohibiting wagers on events with fixed or predicted outcomes, including the Academy Awards.

Under lock and key​

If WWE succeeds in its bid to legalize gambling on matches, it could open the door for legalized betting on other guarded, secret scripted events, such as future character deaths in TV series.
Allowing gambling on certain WWE matches would alter how matches are produced – and how storylines are created. In discussions about how gambling on wrestling could work, WWE executives have proposed that scripted results of matches be locked in months ahead of time, according to people familiar with the matter. The wrestlers themselves wouldn’t know whether they were winning or losing until shortly before a match takes place, said the people.
For example, the WWE could lock the results of Wrestlemania’s main event months ahead of time, based on a scripted storyline that hinged to the winner of January’s Royal Rumble. Betting on the match could then take place between the end of the Royal Rumble and up to days or even hours before Wrestlemania, when the wrestlers and others in the show’s production would learn the results.
The introduction of legalized gambling could give WWE an increased appeal to a new set of fans while significantly altering creative storylines. Paul Levesque, whose wrestling name is Triple H, took over as head of WWE’s creative operations from Vince McMahon in July. McMahon stepped down as WWE chairman and CEO last year amid sexual misconduct allegations but returned to the WWE board in January as executive chairman to prepare the company for a sale process.
WWE is set to meet with potential buyers for the company next month in preparation for first-round bids, two of the people said. There’s no assurance a transaction will take place.
 
The real question is will DSP switch from paying Scopely to whatever betting app he can be gamble on sweaty jpegs?

Who the fuck bets ACTUAL money on WWF shit? When I was kid we bet ice cream, hamburgers, orders of fries, nothing of significant value because we all knew it was fake, but we didn't give a fuck, it was the excitement. But goddamn. Actual, cold hard cash? Fuck out of here Jimmy.
Someone like DSP or Ethan Ralph that live vicariously through sweaty men playing pretend in a ring.
 
How would you make odds on a match already known to be fixed? They can easily take wagers on who might win or different outcomes but setting odds would be controversial.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas

Probably not that different than 'real' sports when it comes to being fixed for gambling​


Back when I was in Junior High, we were talking about baseball in English class for some reason. The teacher mentioned that a few years back she was dating a guy in the mafia. The guy she was dating told her that baseball games were rigged, but she didn't believe him. In response, he gave her a few scores to the next day's games...and they were all correct. Obviously this is third-hand anecdotal evidence but it was the only crazy story that teacher ever told, and with all the other evidence there is, I'm inclined to believe it.
 
How would you make odds on a match already known to be fixed? They can easily take wagers on who might win or different outcomes but setting odds would be controversial.
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't there a big scandal just before the 20's with the White Sox throwing the world series? Wouldn't that apply to every match that was being bet on as the outcome is determined in some sweaty writers' room?
This is either the gambling regulators or the WWE running low on cash and looking to pump some life into their financials, and if I had to guess I'd lean more towards it being the WWE having money problems and looking for a quick injection of cash from idiot fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diana Moon Glampers
How would you make odds on a match already known to be fixed? They can easily take wagers on who might win or different outcomes but setting odds would be controversial.
Usually they're based on the expected booking, like during his streak at WrestleMania putting a buck on Undertaker winning would get your dollar back and that's about it.
 
So the Black Sox would have been just fine if they'd hired some accounting firm to hold onto a sealed envelope saying they were throwing the series?
 
Back