X/Twatter: Anyone notice how the For You feed is suddenly inundated by far-left content after the election?

[gayforyourmom]

Ever since Trump won, my For You feed has been chock-full of Shaniquas, troons, furries, and other lefty types with pronouns and 🏳‍️ in their usernames and bios. They nearly all have low follower counts, but are getting 100-300k likes and millions of views on their posts. Elon is a fucking useless clod for being oblivious to the fact that his platform is still controlled by far-left militant admins. They're leveraging Dorsey-era tweepcred, an algorithm that began development in 2016 (after Trump victory of course) to influence the 2018-2020 election by shadowbanning conservatives and giving massive visibility boosts to the left. They've been activating it off and on ever since Elon bought the place, but now it's turned all the way up.

This can seriously affect 2026 if allowed to continue. Anyone else seeing this?



Doesn't appear to parse the rainbow flags. Testing
🏳‍️

 

[Miriam Margoyles]

 

[Unstable Diffusion]

I sometimes get far-left retards of my country in my feed, but its extremely rare, and 100% of the time it's because someone of the right-wing chuds I follow made fun of them at some point recently.
Must be the algorithm confusing accounts you follow interacting with these people as content you'd want to engage with. When you consider the amount of right-wing accounts that have spread left-wing content to make fun of, it makes sense.

For the highly retarded like count, that's just them using bots.

 

[We Are The Witches]

What's new? Crybabies throwing tantrums on Twitter because other people don't agree with them.

And in the process, that would make them even more terminally online & more vocal, influencing the algorithm. Which is different from a designed system that would artificially prioritize visibility for the left, or that would shadowban conservatives. That would require a bit more of evidence.

Without that evidence, it could be just that they're just malding retards being more obnoxious than usual because they can't accept defeat, and probably using bots as well.
Then at that point, the problem would be bots.

 

[Quijibo69]

They like shooting themselves in the foot, it's like a fetish to them.

 

[JohnnyG]

my For You feed has been chock-full of Shaniquas, troons, furries, and other lefty types with pronouns

Was not aware because I only use the "Following" tab to minimize algorithm tardation.

Same reason you should turn off the Youtube Watch History so you don't get any "trending" or African Tranny Pride recommendations, just a blank page. Find channels you like and go straight to the Subscriptions page (you'll still get sidebar and post-video recommendations, but they should relate to the transmission rebuild vidyas or whatever you're watching, instead of diversity propaganda slop).

 

[The Lawgiver]

"joined november 7th" and is instantly acting like Trump winning THIS election has caused Twitter and youtube to be the screaming ground of troons like that hasn't been a thing since the last 8 years?
Hello fed.

EDIT: The post is now worded differently to include this factor... HMMMMMM....

 

[The Luigi Player]

yeah and I got banned off twitter for posting woody got wood, elon musk clearly intends for twitter to be a day-care for manbabies

 

[BirdUp]

Why do you use Twitter?

 

[Gleen Japan]

*Wins the election*

On topic: To me, Twatters is just bots talking to bots; most of the time, it's hard to tell who is real or not.

 

[Stephanie Bustcakes]

The algorithm that controls what comes up in the "for you" section analyzes your own activity to decide what it thinks you want to see, so if you're interacting with lots of those types it will give you more of that.

 

[didelphigina]

This has been going on way longer before Trump got elected president. Someone could have only 100 followers yet have quote retweets that reach to half a million likes. Twitter has such a strange way with its algorithm, that any bloke can get 100k+ likes just from a simple quote retweet (1000+ points if it's related to them "owning" someone). Of course, this mainly happens to leftists. You barely ever see a right winger get hundreds of thousands of likes from responding to something. They have actually to have a following to achieve that. For leftists, just respond to anything right wing with le epic roast and you won the 1 minute lottery.

That's just how it is with Twitter. It's nothing new. Elon Musk being the owner changes nothing. It's still a majorly leftist site.

 

[gayforyourmom]

The algorithm that controls what comes up in the "for you" section analyzes your own activity to decide what it thinks you want to see, so if you're interacting with lots of those types it will give you more of that.

True, but the algo is forcing leftist crap onto my For You and it happened immediately after the election. Elon never removed the old tweepcred algos and the militant activist admins that remained after the initial purge are still at the helm. All of the political data that Dorsey and his team have been collecting over the years to algorithmically classify users and content still exists, so they know who's black, who's a troon, who's a lib, etc, and can promote that content to any feed they like.

For the highly retarded like count, that's just them using bots.

No, these are legit likes. They're semi-organic in that they're mostly from human users, but the tweepcred algos are giving them an inorganic visibility boost, so their content disseminates across a wider network. It's why you rarely ever see low-follower conservative accounts getting even so much as a few thousand likes on their content, let alone 100-300k.

The post is now worded differently to include this factor

I didn't edit any of the body. One of the mods edited OP to consolidate a supplemental comment I later added.

Why do you use Twitter?

It's the most powerful and influential social media platform around despite its lingering flaws. It undoubtedly had a major influence on this past election. It's so powerful that other nations' governments are trying to shut it down.

 

[gayforyourmom]

This has been going on way longer before Trump got elected president.

Not to this degree. After 2016, the entire internet landscape changed. All the big tech platforms mobilized to make changes to their algos and TOS in an effort to stifle free speech. Project Veritas did well exposing what was going on in Twitter at the time. They admitted on camera that they were redesigning their algos to "keep the shitty people from showing up". Those shitty people were conservatives or anyone who spoke against the mainstream narrative. They were successful, as were all the other platforms. It's why alt platforms like Parler and others began popping up left and right, to escape the algorithmic censorship.

 

[Burnt Effigy]

my For You feed has been chock-full of Shaniquas, troons, furries, and other lefty types with pronouns

I only used my old twitter account for the past few weeks to track US election/voter fraud updates, my for you feed right now is exclusively Conservative twitter and the Elongated Muskrat.

I feel like they've upped the calibration of things you've recently looked for, a few months ago, I remember that it was pretty much exclusively people I followed or who they followed, then again, it may just be doing that if it has no data on what to recommend.

So, stop following leftoids, stop watching leftoid content (or searching for such content to make fun of leftoids), and follow/watch more things you care about, and use the "Not interested in XYZ/Not interested in this post".
Or stop using twitter.

 

[didelphigina]

Not to this degree. After 2016, the entire internet landscape changed. All the big tech platforms mobilized to make changes to their algos and TOS in an effort to stifle free speech. Project Veritas did well exposing what was going on in Twitter at the time. They admitted on camera that they were redesigning their algos to "keep the shitty people from showing up". Those shitty people were conservatives or anyone who spoke against the mainstream narrative. They were successful, as were all the other platforms. It's why alt platforms like Parler and others began popping up left and right, to escape the algorithmic censorship.

No matter how much conservatives and right-wingers flock to their own site, the left will do whatever to breach and mock them despite the fact they did what the left kept demanding them to do—go to their own space. It really does suck, though. It's only free speech if you're a part of the only party that should exist in America, don't you see?

 

[Tablet County]

No because the only shitty social media website I use is Kiwi Farms.

 

[Grub]

I don't use twitter but if it's anything like all the other social media out there I would think it's probably because a bunch of people are actively searching for shit like that right now so the algorithm is pushing that shit because it's trending possibly due to the massive uptick in people losing their minds over the election and being even more vocal and retarded than usual on social media.

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

Threads has been filled to the fucking brim with bots doing this for a week now.

It’s particularly breathtaking because there is no reason a stupid post about Nick Fuentes should get 30k likes. He’s a nobody.

The left is and always has been the minority faction. Giving them the illusion that they are popular just makes the inevitable crash back into reality much more painful

 

[Soycast Guy]

I frequently get a bunch of leftists in my Xitter feed because I call them niggers and retards occasionally, so xitter thinks I like that content. Never have I been in so much pain.