- Joined
- Apr 10, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So when your cottagecore trans-ayden supernatural romance/cosy mystery hits big on booktok, you're converting the royalties to silver coins and sending to Josh, right??Well, I did it. How the fuck can Sanderson do this output on a consistent basis?View attachment 3964860View attachment 3964857
After trying to solicit underage nudes but before getting accused of being every -ist under the sun. It's the modern twitter/booktube/booktok author way.So when your cottagecore trans-ayden supernatural romance/cosy mystery hits big on booktok, you're converting the royalties to silver coins and sending to Josh, right??
Nothing too arcane. When a confused small lesbian decides she must actually be a boy, for some reason she will almost always pick Aiden/Ayden/Jayden/Hayden/Gayden for her super-manly man name. She will then declare herself to be a gay man and exclusively date other confused small lesbians. It's very odd.After trying to solicit underage nudes but before getting accused of being every -ist under the sun. It's the modern twitter/booktube/booktok author way.
I had to google what the hell you were talking about. I still don't know what trans-ayden means
Ooh, is it all non-sexualised violence?I'm expecting some puzzle pieces here, but I actually quite enjoy Wings of Fire. Sure, the fanbase is a bunch of faggots, and my enjoyment of it is probably predicated mostly on my damn near fetish for the sky lizards, and sharing the experience with my wife, but I've read worse. Both adult and YA.
It actually manages to do gay characters right, with it barely being mentioned, just a character mentioning she's worried about her wife, or something like that. Well done! Sadly, this falls apart in one of the latest books with a character rolling up and loudly saying 'I'M A THEM!' before being shunted off into the background where they belong.
But other than that, I'd actually recommend it to younger audiences, unlike most of the garbage in the demo these days. I'm a big fan of traumatizing kids with their media, and the first book alone contains infanticide, casual child murder, torturing to insanity, death by slow acid burning, and burning off half a villains face with pretty good detail for YA (in that it's not afraid to talk about the flesh sloughing off, exposing muscle and bone), and it only gets worse from there. And all of this is couched in a three pronged war of succession where all three options are shit. (Vicious, conniving psychopath, stupid barbarian psychopath, or ditzy moron who can barely count.)
There's even a point of debate between the main cast of if it'd be better to let the clearly evil lunatic win, not because she might be god, but because she'd be a more effective ruler.
Why even write this as a YA Novel though?I'm expecting some puzzle pieces here, but I actually quite enjoy Wings of Fire. Sure, the fanbase is a bunch of faggots, and my enjoyment of it is probably predicated mostly on my damn near fetish for the sky lizards, and sharing the experience with my wife, but I've read worse. Both adult and YA.
It actually manages to do gay characters right, with it barely being mentioned, just a character mentioning she's worried about her wife, or something like that. Well done! Sadly, this falls apart in one of the latest books with a character rolling up and loudly saying 'I'M A THEM!' before being shunted off into the background where they belong.
But other than that, I'd actually recommend it to younger audiences, unlike most of the garbage in the demo these days. I'm a big fan of traumatizing kids with their media, and the first book alone contains infanticide, casual child murder, torturing to insanity, death by slow acid burning, and burning off half a villains face with pretty good detail for YA (in that it's not afraid to talk about the flesh sloughing off, exposing muscle and bone), and it only gets worse from there. And all of this is couched in a three pronged war of succession where all three options are shit. (Vicious, conniving psychopath, stupid barbarian psychopath, or ditzy moron who can barely count.)
There's even a point of debate between the main cast of if it'd be better to let the clearly evil lunatic win, not because she might be god, but because she'd be a more effective ruler.
Because the author wants to eat food and sleep indoors.Why even write this as a YA Novel though?
I dont know what depresses me more the fact that a novel with such content is being marketed to teenagers or the fact that in order to eat the author has to market it to teenagers.Because the author wants to eat food and sleep indoors.
Compared to "Watership Down", "Felidae", even "Animorphs", the "Wings of Fire" is relatively milder because such events are spaced out that you concentrate on the dragon that's the focus of the book ATT. Hells, "Animorphs" was directed for kids, in which the series include cannibalism (on two separate occasions iirc), deaths, an ant accidentally acquires the ability to morph and becomes a human though it can't stop screaming, forcing someone to stay in morph of that of a rat then condemning him to live on an island far away from civilization, ect.I dont know what depresses me more the fact that a novel with such content is being marketed to teenagers or the fact that in order to eat the author has to market it to teenagers.
It's absolutely non-sexualised, I'm happy to say.Ooh, is it all non-sexualised violence?
I've got a teen girl who's grown out of kidfic and likes a bit of gore but (understandably) doesn't have any tolerance for rapey storylines...I tried giving her some Anne McCaffrey dragon books but she declared them to be 'the bad kind of gay'.
She really liked the Abercrombie Half a King series but I'm struggling with what to give her next
Fair enough point i guess its just weird i dunno maybe im growing old.Compared to "Watership Down", "Felidae", even "Animorphs", the "Wings of Fire" is relatively milder because such events are spaced out that you concentrate on the dragon that's the focus of the book ATT. Hells, "Animorphs" was directed for kids, in which the series include cannibalism (on two separate occasions iirc), deaths, an ant accidentally acquires the ability to morph and becomes a human though it can't stop screaming, forcing someone to stay in morph of that of a rat then condemning him to live on an island far away from civilization, ect.
Yeah, I loveloveLOVED that series, but looking back it was very horse-girl...It's unfortunate that your daughter (I'm guessing) doesn't like Anne McCaffrey books, at least of the "Dragonriders of Pern" series, though while it's been a long time since I've last read one, I can kind of understand.
As Rusty said, there's not a whiff of sexualization in there. Well, there might be two, if you stretch your definition to the point of stupidity.Ooh, is it all non-sexualised violence?
I've got a teen girl who's grown out of kidfic and likes a bit of gore but (understandably) doesn't have any tolerance for rapey storylines...I tried giving her some Anne McCaffrey dragon books but she declared them to be 'the bad kind of gay'.
She really liked the Abercrombie Half a King series but I'm struggling with what to give her next
I don’t remember any sexual stuff. The most I think is a preteen girl following around one of the secondary characters with googly eyes knowing they were destined for a political marriage also they are about 5-7 years apart in age. Even then the character is in his teens and finds it weird at the time.Have you tried giving her Magician?
Not quite. It's not a DnD campaign turned book but you can tell it's got that game system in the background if you're looking for it. It's pretty interesting that it's more of a large political story than a character story which wasn't common for its time.Also can’t that entire series can be summed up as Raymond E Feist novelizes his D&D game.
Lmao, yeah I get it. Me with dragons and cats back in the day.Yeah, I loveloveLOVED that series, but looking back it was very horse-girl...