Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depending on where it was produced the paper may have some rag fibres in it which makes it incredibly durable to normal handling. As you probably know, books in that period were very much the property of the wealthy. Paperbacks weren't widely available until the mid to late 1930s.a book printed in either the late 1860s or early 1870s
It was printed in New York City in 1870 exactly. There's some beautiful color prints on pages separated by what looks like wax paper, so I wouldn't be surprised if they went all in on paper quality in general. I think this was a library book by how beat up the cover is, plus some other markings here and there, but the inside has aged remarkably well.Depending on where it was produced the paper may have some rag fibres in it which makes it incredibly durable to normal handling. As you probably know, books in that period were very much the property of the wealthy. Paperbacks weren't widely available until the mid to late 1930s.
He was either going to get cancelled by his Noo Yawk overlords or bend the knee. Guess we know which choice was made. 'Course anyone who voluntarily spends time around Mary Robinette Kowal is immediately suspect in my book.
FWIW, I read two of the however many books were done through the kickstarter. I know it was at least four, but I somehow think there was other stuff. Tress of the Emerald Sea and Yumi and the Nightmare Painter. Not bad, very light fare and I would consider both YA. No degeneracy like the stuff above I can recall.
Started the Sunlit Man but for some reason wasn't feeling it, probably since that one seemed way more Cosmere inside baseball crap from page 1. Something about an escapee from Scadrial or Roshar or maybe the Warbreaker planet (I never figured that part out) being chased to another world, not one I think had been referenced before. I guess I'm getting too old for deep dives into lore like this any more, dunno. Seemed like it was written for people who are pretty hardcore into the Cosmere, at any rate.
So… from a practical viewpoint does it make sense to follow Booktok trends as an author? Does that translate into sales? Does it translate into sales if you’re indie or publishing?
Like there are so many problems with professional publishing and now with Kindle, Royal Road has a weirdly specific audience… how do authors even get their feet in the doors in 2025?
It’s hard to get into the mind of some of the younger online audience, it seems like they don’t understand nuance and want to be able to check what tropes and characters are in the book before they read it. I look at the Webtoons for boys as well as Royal Road and I see a bunch of stats and random screens popping up. Just pure autism. It’s just so alien and obscure to me.

I have some UK mid war (1942,44) first edition hard covers and the pages are almost translucent.
Depending on where it was produced the paper may have some rag fibres in it which makes it incredibly durable to normal handling. As you probably know, books in that period were very much the property of the wealthy. Paperbacks weren't widely available until the mid to late 1930s.
I am now sitting on my hands to stop myself sperging about timber, paper, Commonwealth trade, and the rise of South American exports in the first half of C20th.
Oh yeah some older books have amazing quality paper and sewn bindings. I've got a Fu-Manchu omnibus from 1929 that's printed on this super thin but pretty high quality paper.It was printed in New York City in 1870 exactly. There's some beautiful color prints on pages separated by what looks like wax paper, so I wouldn't be surprised if they went all in on paper quality in general. I think this was a library book by how beat up the cover is, plus some other markings here and there, but the inside has aged remarkably well.
Yeah I've noticed that once you're down that rabbit hole of being a publicly conservative culture warrior, intentionally or not, you're pretty much pigeon=holed into it.Now, I was about to make a post about how you don't have to worry about BookTok anymore due to its banning, but Trump has swooped in to save it. All the leftist women needed a win, I guess, so it looks like BookTok will remain a thing, and publishing and Barnes & Nobles will continue to be dominated by trope marketing.
You don't have to follow all the trope marketing though, but it wouldn't hurt to choose a couple you can write well and focus on them in your marketing. You can't fake love for a trope, readers can sense it if you do.
More important than trope marketing, though, is to remember to not become a public conservative culture warrior. That'll kill your career so fast. You must avoid the temptation to be "based" with your author profile. Don't advertise the fact that you're not woke or voted for Trump or whatever. That type of stuff will get you a following in the right-wing sections of X, including the "dissident" art scene hosted by BAP, but it won't get you many normie readers and it certainly won't help you get an agent or get reviewed by an influencer. Don't use AI art. Woke people will cancel you for it, and even many conservatives and apolitical people hate it as well. Being anti-AI is a pretty bipartisan position among writers on X.
When I say this stuff, I often get a bunch of "thunk provoking" emojis, but just take a look at this sad, sad right-wing publisher house:
This BASED publisher has been publishing books for TEN YEARS! No one cares. The guy can't even collect a single like. And that is very typical for based publishers. Some go viral now and again, but very rarely does that translate into sales. Also, the authors which do publish at the based houses usually use a pen name. So they can't further a career that way even if they win the based lottery and manage to sell more than a dozen books.
Dumb, more useless hating on AI ArDon't use AI art. Woke people will cancel you for it, and even many conservatives and apolitical people hate it as well. Being anti-AI is a pretty bipartisan position among writers on X.

That is abysmal. I know people who have donated stories to local charity anthologies and they usually get a few copies to keep/gift/sell on.They don't pay their authors, and then tell their authors they have to pay full-price if they want a copy of their own book.
This is worse than self-publishing and is borderline to being a vanity house.4. Worse, they don't pay their authors when they "purchase" the right to their stories. Instead, Raconteur tells the authors that IF the anthology gets royalties, they'll split it like twenty ways among the authors after getting their own cut. But since these anthologies aren't really selling, you can bet the authors aren't seeing much money.

>edited byThis is worse than self-publishing and is borderline to being a vanity house.
And LMAO, this is one of their book covers...what a mess.
View attachment 6907873




I just wanna say that I really really like the cover for that troon Gretchen's book.
View attachment 6850134
it's fucking repulsive and terribly written
That description sounds a thousand times better than reading the actual books was. Makes a man want to put pen to paper, (or finger to keyboard) and actually produce a series worth that description.from his official website.
They can, they are, and they will act snobbish about how their smut is totally different than the boys.These girls and women can't be reading 100+ 800 pages long porn books per year, right?
Your description of her work makes her sound like she would have definitely fit in with the 70s feminist crowd.and it was probably the 70s of the feminism she wouldn't have fit in with, I always thought that she ided as a feminist mostly to upset the women who took feminism seriously.
And LMAO, this is one of their book covers...what a mess.
Does that include doing the shitty book cover? That's disgusting.
Like a breath of fresh air. Another who understands this is author Christopher Ruocchio has some bitchin cover art, and I'm willing to bet part of his success is do to the covers alone.That cover is shit but I'd still take it over the modern minimalist abstract covers that have plagued us for years.


Maybe there is some good to cancel culture after all.You probably also know Sam was recently fired for criticizing Elon Musk's hand gesture at Trump's inauguration. She didn't mention it on air. She posted memes critical of Elon on her private Instagram account. Within a day or so, she was fired.
Dude either has his own publishing house or he's a big enough name to have convinced the publishing house to let him design his own covers. Good on him.and I'm willing to bet part of his success is do to the covers alone.
Ruocchio went from Daw to Baen and has now gone back to Daw. I guess those Chinky VC shekels are irresistible.Dude either has his own publishing house or he's a big enough name to have convinced the publishing house to let him design his own covers. Good on him.