Culture Yale: White Authors Pulled from English Department Curriculum

  • Thread starter Thread starter RI 360
  • Start date Start date
Yale ‘decolonizes’ English dept. after complaints studying white authors ‘actively harms’ students

English majors no longer required to take class focused on Chaucer, Shakespeare

A year and a half after a petition circulated calling for Yale to
“decolonize the English department,” the first students are enrolled in a new course created by the department to increase the breadth of the curriculum and combat claims of departmental racism.

What’s more, new requirements are in place to ensure a more “diversified” slate of courses.

Previous requirements for the major included two courses in “Major English Poets,” including Chaucer, Shakespeare, Donne, Milton and Eliot, among others. But that two-course series petitioners had deemed actively harmful due to its focus on white male poets. The series is no longer a graduation requirement for Yale’s English majors.

The petition, a Google document which has since been made private, critiqued the perceived whiteness of the English department requirements: “A year spent around a seminar table where the literary contributions of women, people of color, and queer folk are absent actively harms all students, regardless of their identity.”

“It’s time for the English major to decolonize — not diversify — its course offerings,” the petition added. “A 21st century education is a diverse education: we write to you today inspired by student activism across the university, and to make sure that you know that the English department is not immune from the collective call to action.”

Nearly a year after the petition, around seven months ago, Yale’s English faculty voted to “diversity” the curriculum. At the time of the vote, the director of the department’s undergraduate studies, Jessica Brantley, told The Yale Daily News: “We’ve constructed a curriculum that has inclusion as its goal, embedded in the structures of its requirements, and I’m very excited to implement and develop that curriculum further.”

The reconfiguring of the English department’s required courses did not directly address the demands of the petition to do away with the Major English Poets sequences altogether; the courses still exist. The reconfiguration also did not refocus the program’s pre-1800 and pre-1900 literature requirement to address issues of race, gender, and sexuality as demanded by the petition.

Instead, the English department now allows students to fill three required prerequisites from a choice of four different courses: Readings in English Poetry 1, Readings in English Poetry 2, Readings in American Literature, and a newly created course, Readings in Comparative World English Literature.

Because Chaucer and Shakespeare are both studied in English Poetry 1, these expanded options mean that a student could graduate from the program without ever reading either of these authors.

Readings in English Poetry 2 focuses on more recent poets, including Milton through Eliot and other modern writers.

Meanwhile, the newly developed Comparative World English course, which debuted this fall, is taught by English professor Stephanie Newell.

Her research focuses on “the public sphere in colonial West Africa and issues of gender, sexuality, and power as articulated through popular print cultures,” according to her faculty bio.

Other courses she has taught at Yale include “Contemporary African Fiction: Challenges to Realism,” “South African Writing After Apartheid,” and “Postcolonial World Literatures, 1945 to Present,” her bio states.

According to Professor Newell, there was significant interest in the course during the fall semester. The current class has 20 students, which is a larger seminar-style course compared to many other Yale courses, which are capped at 15 or 18.

Reached via email by The College Fix, Newell described her teaching style in this course as “the opposite of ‘close reading’ – we spend a great deal of time discussing cultural, linguistic and historical contexts, and we have read and discussed some classic works of postcolonial theory in conjunction with the primary texts. Likewise, when students write essays, I encourage them to undertake secondary reading and research, as well as to analyze primary texts.”

“I haven’t had any feedback from the students who led the petition as to whether or not they are satisfied with the overall changes in the major,” Newell told The Fix. “Obviously, there will be a vital opportunity at the end of semester for students to give feedback on this particular course in their evaluations.”

According to its course description, English 128: Readings in Comparative World English Literature still features a number of white male writers, including Daniel Defoe, John Millington Synge, and James Joyce. Other writers featured on the syllabus for this fall include Jean Rhys, Alice Munro, Ngugi wa Thiong’o, and Salman Rushdie.
 
What do English majors even get employed as besides teachers?

Some people I know with undergraduate/postgraduate degrees in English and/or Literary Studies have found themselves involved in various fields, such as:

advertising
copywriting, technical and otherwise
content creation and related positions
editing and related positions in publishing
media production
public relations
news production, reporting and other areas in journalism
marketing
policy analysis
sales management
lobbyist
communications
event planning (product runs, political, etc.)
curating/archiving
translation
 
Some people I know with undergraduate/postgraduate degrees in English and/or Literary Studies have found themselves involved in various fields, such as:

advertising
copywriting, technical and otherwise
content creation and related positions
editing and related positions in publishing
media production
public relations
news production, reporting and other areas in journalism
marketing
policy analysis
sales management
lobbyist
communications
event planning (product runs, political, etc.)
curating/archiving
translation

Well that explains why all of these fields have gone to hell
 
Have you noticed that when they want to "diversify," they never add in classics by people like Oscar Wilde, Murasaki Shikibu, Alexander Dumas, and Sun Tzu? All of which are well-written, venerated, and written by ethnic or sexual minorities..? If you like minority CHARACTERS, what about Jules Verne's Indian freedom fighter (including, most notably, freakin CAPTAIN NEMO!) and heroic escaped slaves fighting against a evil slavetraders? What about Shakespeare's characters and Long John Silver(!) who are in INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES to blacks? What about the shining Prince Genji, who is heavily implied in the book to be bisexual (as are many of Murasaki Shikibu's male characters in Genji?) What about the cultural richness of China's Journey to the West and Tale of the Red Chamber, or medieval Japan's Sarashina Diary and Pillow Book? Where are the Egyptian and Ethiopian legends,and the classics of the Islamic caliphates?

This isn't just about "adding diversity-" the world classics ABOUND in diversity, if you know where to look: this is about destroying greatness. These ignorant people do not value the rich multicultural traditions they claim to venerate: they just hate learning, and most of all, they hate whites (OR IS IT CHRISTIANS?) They tend to seek diverse replacement literature that is both vulgar and obscene in its content, and I do think that, to some extent, that is purposeful. As someone said, "We must make Western civilisation STINK. Only then will the revolution of the proletariat be possible." To build a new future, one must destroy and obfuscate the greatness of the past, so that its good points cannot compete with a nebulous and Utopian future ("Ye shall be as gods, knowing both good AND evil!") It's easy to destroy and replace that which has no value to people: how many of you cry when your garbage is trucked away?

There's nothing wrong with criticizing the excesses and barbarism of the past- but we should take what is GOOD from it!

Honestly most of these fools have never heard of world literature: they simply hate white culture. Bring in diversity, by all means! But let that diversity be worth something.

They'll have to pry the classic books out of my cold, dead hands.
 
You know, it used to be that the students I couldn't take seriously were those who went to the religious fundamentalist colleges where young earth creationism was the dominant view and Jesus was an acceptable answer to any question. In many respects those schools and their students remain a pathetic joke, but at this point they're not much more of one than the supposed leading universities in this country.
It's almost as if they are the same species of cunt wearing different masks
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Lawgiver
Ivy Leaguers are a bunch of snobby liberal faggots anyway. Future Assholes (err "leaders") of America are created there. Let them burn.
 
Back