Your Favorite Philosopher

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
CS Peirce. His triadic ontology is very useful, and the way it couples to his semeotic theory is actually philosophy being useful and inspiring. If you want a philosopher who will give you tools to view reality in new ways, I don't know of anyone anywhere near as prolific.

Gary North (RIP) wrote a tome on what is effectively his philosophy of historiography, "The Biblical Structure of History". Like all of his later work, it is freely available on his website. https://www.garynorth.com/TheBiblicalStructureOfHistory.pdf

In this book, I explain the nature of the intellectual warfare between two irreconcilable theories of history and two traditions of writing about history. The first is the Christian concept of history. The second is humanism’s concept of history. Both groups have adopted similar organizational categories for understanding history, but their presuppositions are radically opposed. I discuss this conflict of visions in terms of the rivalry between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of man. I show why you and generations of Christians before you have been deliberately misinformed about the history of Western civilization.
 
Last edited:
Even today we're going to war without thinking and not winning.
If it's any consellation, the architects of this war will certainly come out ahead.

My nigger. un irocially I think he's by far one of the wisest people ever, the first ever long troll and used to shit over the greats of his time like Socrates just for the lulz and still be right. He doesn't get the credit he should. In a lot of ways he showed an innocence of hedonism. He did a lot of good in his life, helped people spread learning and lived how he wants. When ever I feel down I don't know what happened on Game of Thrones or shit like that I think, well I'd still be me jerking off in a barrel and I'm a good person so fuck em it's a TV show I don't care about.
Diogenes was a degenerate that would have a lolcow page. People love to laugh at his inane behaviour from a distance, but if you went to the theater, one of the few ways of entertainment and he sat next to you, masturbating again, it'd be annoying and disgusting. He was also a cheat, who had been banished for debasement of currency.


But he was a funny lad. When captured by pirates and asked his trade, he said that his only trade was to govern men so he could be sold to someone who needs a master.

When near death, asked for how he wished to die, he said to throw him out of the city walls so wild animals could feast on his body. Won't you mind? No, just give me a stick to chase them away. How will you use the stick without being conscious? How will I mind if I'm not conscious?

----

That said, a couple of years back I went through some of the classics. I didn't find a single thing of value in plato's writing, but aristotle had so many things that were immediately applicable to things I was thinking about. I can see why even muslims called him "the great teacher" and it's a shame most of his work has been lost in time.

And to throw an unusual philosopher in the mix, morihei ueshiba was a big influemce as well, who wrote the art of peace (as counterpart to sun tzu's art of war). He was a soldier and then martial artist in life who created aikido.

The fundamental flaw of aikido has always seemed to me, that it makes the most sense to learn for a retiring warrior of some sort, rather than as the first fighting style. Many of the essential ways of pacifying violence make the most sense if violence is already known by the practitioner.
 
Last edited:
I think Kaczynski would probably qualify as a political philosopher and actually said a fair amount of things that made sense. He's not going to win any prizes as a prose stylist, but his writing, while workmanlike, carries his thoughts well.
 
I think Kaczynski would probably qualify as a political philosopher and actually said a fair amount of things that made sense. He's not going to win any prizes as a prose stylist, but his writing, while workmanlike, carries his thoughts well.

It's funny, I remember downloading his manifesto like 20 years ago and gave up reading part way through because they were the obvious ramblings of a madman, who had no idea how people would respond to the things he was warning about.

Then I read his writings again a couple of years ago and holy shit....dude actually nailed it. Reading him now and it all makes sense, but that fucker saw it coming decades ago and we didn't listen.

Free Downloads of his work here.
 
Diogenes was a degenerate that would have a lolcow page. People love to laugh at his inane behaviour from a distance, but if you went to the theater, one of the few ways of entertainment and he sat next to you, masturbating again, it'd be annoying and disgusting.
This is an ancient necropost, but that should be expected in a thread like this.

Say whatever you like about Diogenes, and his barrel-living, jacking off in public behavior, but he was a man who, confronted with Alexander the Great, the most powerful man in the world, and asked for advice, told him "get out of my light" because he was pissed off that Alexander the Great was disrupting his basking in the Sun.
 
Michel de Montaigne, I credit him from awakening me from my Dogmatic Slumber. Also Wittgenstein because I'm autistic
 
This is an ancient necropost, but that should be expected in a thread like this.

Say whatever you like about Diogenes, and his barrel-living, jacking off in public behavior, but he was a man who, confronted with Alexander the Great, the most powerful man in the world, and asked for advice, told him "get out of my light" because he was pissed off that Alexander the Great was disrupting his basking in the Sun.
the school of dog has so little works of body that survived to this day. Sadly all we have are semi true anectodes about his life.
Lucianos is the best known person from his school. i advise you to look at him. He is a blast. He shat on gods and all important public figures. the main positions of the dog school is that living within nature, in a self sufficient manner, and rejection of most of the societies behaviour because it is unnatural and unreasonable. Diogenes was a fraud in Sinope, but he changed a lot it seems.
His way of living and philosophy is still living spiritually. Of course i cannot say that Monastery life of catholic priests is influanced by him, as they are far apart in onthologial and spiritual manner, but the practice was similar and still alive.

Diogenes was a beggar that begged money and food from statues of athens for a year to learn humility and get accustomed to indifferance from people. Some saints licked feces or sucked pus out of people to learn humility.
 
I think Kaczynski would probably qualify as a political philosopher and actually said a fair amount of things that made sense. He's not going to win any prizes as a prose stylist, but his writing, while workmanlike, carries his thoughts well.
While Kacynsnki was objectively correct about everything, I’m not sure I would consider him a philosopher (he didn’t consider himself one either) in the same vein as Lenin not being a philosopher despite writing critiques of capitalism
 
Aristotle.

It's the only philospher who laid out paradigms that were objective improvements over the ones I previously thought of myself. I think I either don't understand or otherwise reject the others.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Neodanthril
Sterner of course!

Nah just kidding, Hegelians are faggots and should have been executed. The only Germoid philosopher I like is Goethe if he counts as one.

Mark Twain if he counts, anything that can be mocked should be mocked. Norm "old chunk of coal" Macdonald.
 
Back