YouTube Commentary Community - You know shit's about to get real when the cartoon avatar crosses their arms!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Not just nicholas but even chud logic is sweeping for tom
I can't figure out what the point that's even being made is. It sounds like Tom originally made a completely irreverent statement about cheating in a romantic relationship that sounds fucking retarded to any normal, well-adjusted person listening and people are giving him shit for it. If I was to make a good faith interpretation of Tom's comments on cheating, it sounds to me like he's trying to say that he doesn't care about people cheating in relation to online cancellations and drama because it's something between people in the relationship and not something he can bring himself to be upset about for various reasons and he's tired of seeing people make a big deal out of other people being unfaithful online as if it's any of their business

Ignoring how silly that take is on its face considering the general history of Tom's content, commentary in general and the MASSIVE "70% of people cheat" cope, why is Chud Logic even trying to defend it? I feel like what I've seen of Chud is mostly reasonably. I figured he'd just say that Tom made a poorly thought out statement that probably didn't adequately convey what he actually meant and then have a laugh at the 70% number. Instead he starts yelling at chat, talking about how he himself was also cheated on and generally just coping. You can let Tom take an L, Chud. In the grand scale of online drama, Tom's take is extremely mild but it's still retarded and should be laughed at.
 
commentary in general and the MASSIVE "70% of people cheat" cope
Tom admits outright that percentage was pulled completely out of his ass in the call with Chud
If I was to make a good faith interpretation of Tom's comments on cheating, it sounds to me like he's trying to say that he doesn't care about people cheating in relation to online cancellations and drama because it's something between people in the relationship and not something he can bring himself to be upset about for various reasons and he's tired of seeing people make a big deal out of other people being unfaithful online as if it's any of their business
Which again is retarded because how is "you shouldn't care about someone cheating on another person because it's none of your business" any different from "you shouldn't care about someone abusing another person because it's none of your business".
How is one a judgement of character but not the other? How is one worthy of "cancellation" but the other is "oh you were young and dumb, a lot of people do it, don't get so worked up over it"?
If he really thinks "cheating isn't something people should care about because it's none of their business" then by that logic most internet drama is shit he shouldn't cover "because it's none of his business".
 
Last edited:
Relevant crosspost
Tom just raised more questions than answers.
On one hand, he claims that he was "a heat seeking missle" levels of horny.
But on the other hand, he needs "an emotional connection to get an erection"

View attachment 6442932
He just presented us with with two contradictory positions- he's lying and hiding something.
 
I can't figure out what the point that's even being made is. It sounds like Tom originally made a completely irreverent statement about cheating in a romantic relationship that sounds fucking retarded to any normal, well-adjusted person listening and people are giving him shit for it. If I was to make a good faith interpretation of Tom's comments on cheating, it sounds to me like he's trying to say that he doesn't care about people cheating in relation to online cancellations and drama because it's something between people in the relationship and not something he can bring himself to be upset about for various reasons and he's tired of seeing people make a big deal out of other people being unfaithful online as if it's any of their business

Ignoring how silly that take is on its face considering the general history of Tom's content, commentary in general and the MASSIVE "70% of people cheat" cope, why is Chud Logic even trying to defend it? I feel like what I've seen of Chud is mostly reasonably. I figured he'd just say that Tom made a poorly thought out statement that probably didn't adequately convey what he actually meant and then have a laugh at the 70% number. Instead he starts yelling at chat, talking about how he himself was also cheated on and generally just coping. You can let Tom take an L, Chud. In the grand scale of online drama, Tom's take is extremely mild but it's still retarded and should be laughed at.
The 70% comment is also stupid because it doesnt justify anything, if 70% of a city stole from businesses, that doesnt justify stealing. This is the type of shit he and his 3rd internet daddy 'tiny would lose their minds over if hasan or F&F/ the redpill community would say it.

Edit: completely unrelated but some people were timed out of the rfc server, might be related but i wont assume that yet.
 
Last edited:
Tom admits outright that percentage was pulled completely out of his ass in the call with Chud

Which again is stupid because how is "you shouldn't care about someone cheating on another person because it's none of your business" any different from "you shouldn't care about someone abusing another person because it's none of your business".
How is one a judgement of character but not the other? How is one worthy of "cancellation" but the other is "oh you were young and dumb, a lot of people do it, don't get so worked up over it"?
If he really thinks "cheating isn't something people should care about because it's none of their business" then by that logic most internet drama is shit he shouldn't cover "because it's none of his business".
What makes this even werider is that same stream this video was clipped from also covered the vtuber froot cheating abuse scandal.
Chud went over that entire document after Tom recommended him to read it, and didn't see how him doing that is hypocritical at all
 
This bulgarian wigger and his butt buddies are one of the most annoying group of fags on the internet. This sort of high school gossip tier drama is their bread and butter, its how they milk the sweet, sweet income from their retarded audience's teats, yet when one of them in their little circlejerk gets into it, they start blowing their loads into each other's mouths, blabbering about how "it's not a problem anymore when one of us does it because it just is ok!" Genuine glasshouse dwelling bottom feeders, all I hope is that once this circle of fags finally cannibalizes each other, maybe the low-IQ mushmouths that enjoy this non-enertainment will wake up and stop whoring their money out to fat people, tranny chasers, and the British.
 
It's about time Tom finally slips up and gives all the people he pisses off ammo against him. I'm glad his fencesitting, ladderclimbing, monkeybranching ass is getting put to task. He has had too many dogshit opinions to still desrve any respect. It's gotten to the point where it seems like barely anyone even likes him anymore because his ego got too big. Lefties don't like him because he skinwalks Leafy, Righties can't stand him because "her prostate" and other Destiny tier opinions he regurgitates, Kiwi Farms tolerates him at best. God please let this be a full downward spiral into lolcowdom. It already seems a lot of his audience has turned against him too. I hate commentary faggots and the internet commentary community imploding is kino.
 
Sam Hyde gave to OK to carve the Turkey.
out of all people to call out tom, Froggy lol. I saw Chud made a video about it. Why does Tom’s commentary buddies not let him defend himself ? Froggy is the only person who has called Tom on his hypocrisy. Tom not even a month ago sperged out about the disel patches video where he scored Tom.
 
That wasn't a friendly inside joke?
I thought tom had an issue initially with the video because Tom shit on the video. The diesel video he was ranking beast slop videos and Tom thought he did more, it’s a another creators video and Tom’s just saying all the creators didn’t makes the content farm as good as Tom
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BeetleBug242
1727054401729.png
 
"The Booboss debate"
I at least know the rough context for this after watching like 5+ videos on BlowBlax.
  • 2016
  • 2018
  • 2020
    • BlowBlax makes a "video archival" channel where he'd reupload other people's videos in a non-transformative way.
    • BlowBlax faces criticism for stealing other users' content and monetizing it on his archival channel. Augie and DeOrio sweep for him and argue archiving is a valuable endeavor.
    • Other channels start reuploading BlowBlax's BlackLivesMatter song, "archiving" it.
    • BlowBlax is upset about the reuploads, decides to publicly ask on Twitter what he should do to take down videos he doesn't want up. Someone tells him to start copyright striking uploads, he says it's a good idea and begins copyright striking people.
    • After being told he false flagged someone whose video was transformative, with him criticizing BlowBlax in the video, BlowBlax attempts to rescind the strike and issues an incredibly weak apology, wedged in the middle of a 4 hour livestream, where he blames it on "being high."
    • While streaming Sonic Adventure 2 with some cringy mod, BlowBlax would start banning anybody in his chat who brought up him abusing DMCA.
    • "The Boo Boss Stream" During a Mario Sunshine stream, BlowBlax would argue with DeOrio in Twitter/Discord/whatever DMs about the DMCA issue and say on stream Nick's "bitching," and insist on pulling him into the call. DeOrio would join the call and insist he doesn't want to get heated with BlowBlax about the DMCA issue, BlowBlax in turn insisted they do debate because it'd "make good content."
      DeOrio's main points were:
      • BlowBlax keeps downplaying the situation by making excuses, like saying "I was just high!"
      • The striking was premeditated, as BlowBlax was having private conversations with DeOrio about how mad the reuploads made him.
      • Striking the archival reuploads was spitting in the face of Augie and DeOrio who were, at the time, arguing that BlowBlax's archival channel has a right to exist. Making Augie and DeOrio look like massive retards for supporting him.
    • This reduced BlowBlax to tears, upset DeOrio didn't watch the entire 4 hour stream with the apology, screaming "LET ME SPEEEEAAAAAAAAK!!!!!!" and audibly crying, making the entire stream awkward. Augie would then sweep it up, ending the stream immediately and privating the vod. Keep in mind that this nigga is 24 years old in this clip.
  • 2024
    • Some commentary channel, in some unrelated drama with BlowBlax I guess, watches and reacts to "The Boo Boss Stream" and says BlowBlax was incredibly manipulative and snakey.
    • BlowBlax has a freakout at the guy, and tells DeOrio privately he's a massive faggot retard who should be banned from everywhere.
This video from the time is a good summary of the DMCA abuse and "Boo Boss" situation.

This shit is like impossible for follow. Hopefully that helped somewhat.
 
Last edited:
@Catboy Ranch Dressing Holy shit man, this makes this so much worse. So I'm expected to have a nearly decades worth of knowledge about, what honestly amounts to some retarded nothingburger, and say "yup, hang bowblax, this is unforgiveable". Like I'm stunned something this minute AND THIS FUCKING LONG AGO, is something that stuck in De Orio's craw bad enough to burn the bridge! Someone said it best earlier ITT, Nick's the most annoying office gossiper who's keeping dirt on everyone else to drop on the rest of his coworkers when they annoy him enough. What an insufferable faggot.
 
So I'm expected to have a nearly decades worth of knowledge about, what honestly amounts to some retarded nothingburger, and say "yup, hang bowblax, this is unforgiveable". Like I'm stunned something this minute AND THIS FUCKING LONG AGO, is something that stuck in De Orio's craw bad enough to burn the bridge!
It's basically tangential at best to the shitshow that's going on now, but it is funny. It's a situation where BlowBlax was so hypocritical to what he built his channel on that it should've been career ending. But DeOrio, Augie, and the rest swept it up for him because he was their pet retard.

What's happening now is BlowBlax is having an insane schizo meltdown where he's burning bridges with everybody who was previously sweeping up for him, so the old shit's coming back to bite him in the ass. He's having schizo meltdowns in people's DMs, he's lying about having BPD and begging DeOrio for money, he's secretly recording calls and DM conversations and leaking everything thinking he's ending people's careers. DeOrio refuses to leak what caused BlowBlax's meltdown back in July, and BlowBlax is abusing that by bringing it up whenever he wants DeOrio to shut up. And DeOrio is too much of a pussy to just leak it.
 
Last edited:
Back