- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
With the way social media has democratized things, being a "foremost voice" is more having a web presence than achieving formal recognition. Andrew Wilson has no real authority other than the surrendered will of those who watch him online -- no established Church body lists or promotes him. He claims to be Orthodox, but simply attending a Church does not confer authority (not sure if it's known where he attends or how frequently he even does attend).Pretty sad state of affairs for Christian ethics when its foremost voice is a-okay with some dirty nigger flying white teenage girls out to have sex with him.
To me, his religious convictions appear more to be subservient to his 'red pill' ideology, lending an aire of gravitas to a loosely defined set of beliefs whose only real unitive aspect is being against the neo-liberal hegemony -- this will eventually go out of style given it's entirely conditioned on a particular transitory moment in history. In this respect, it's he's no different from Fuentes who leveraged Catholicism for his own political project; I'm aware of no one who believes him to be foremost in anything related to Catholicism.
Seeing that his real creedo is that of "The Church of the Red Pill", it shouldn't be surprising he's cozied up to a Muslim rape apologist. He'd gladly break bread with a Jew if there happened to be one who parroted off the same transgressive schlock that Tate does. Being transgressive is all the rage now anyways -- it's the new hip thing -- and there's plenty of fools out there seeking something new and exciting with money they are more than happy to part with.