Culture Youtube gonna be tougher with content control, working with organizations such as ADL - Pepe is gonna be banned.

https://youtube.googleblog.com/2017/08/an-update-on-our-commitment-to-fight.html

A little over a month ago, we told you about the four new steps we’re taking to combat terrorist content on YouTube: better detection and faster removal driven by machine learning, more experts to alert us to content that needs review, tougher standards for videos that are controversial but do not violate our policies, and more work in the counter-terrorism space.

We wanted to give you an update on these commitments:

Better detection and faster removal driven by machine learning: We’ve always used a mix of technology and human review to address the ever-changing challenges around controversial content on YouTube. We recently began developing and implementing cutting-edge machine learning technology designed to help us identify and remove violent extremism and terrorism-related content in a scalable way. We have started rolling out these tools and we are already seeing some positive progress:
  • Speed and efficiency: Our machine learning systems are faster and more effective than ever before. Over 75 percent of the videos we've removed for violent extremism over the past month were taken down before receiving a single human flag.
  • Accuracy: The accuracy of our systems has improved dramatically due to our machine learning technology. While these tools aren’t perfect, and aren’t right for every setting, in many cases our systems have proven more accurate than humans at flagging videos that need to be removed.
  • Scale: With over 400 hours of content uploaded to YouTube every minute, finding and taking action on violent extremist content poses a significant challenge. But over the past month, our initial use of machine learning has more than doubled both the number of videos we've removed for violent extremism, as well as the rate at which we’ve taken this kind of content down.
We are encouraged by these improvements, and will continue to develop our technology in order to make even more progress. We are also hiring more people to help review and enforce our policies, and will continue to invest in technical resources to keep pace with these issues and address them responsibly.

More experts: Of course, our systems are only as good as the the data they’re based on. Over the past weeks, we have begun working with more than 15 additional expert NGOs and institutions through our Trusted Flagger program, including the Anti-Defamation League, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. These organizations bring expert knowledge of complex issues like hate speech, radicalization, and terrorism that will help us better identify content that is being used to radicalize and recruit extremists. We will also regularly consult these experts as we update our policies to reflect new trends. And we’ll continue to add more organizations to our network of advisors over time.

Tougher standards: We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes. We’ll begin to roll this new treatment out to videos on desktop versions of YouTube in the coming weeks, and will bring it to mobile experiences soon thereafter. These new approaches entail significant new internal tools and processes, and will take time to fully implement.

Early intervention and expanding counter-extremism work: We’ve started rolling out features from Jigsaw’s Redirect Method to YouTube. When people search for sensitive keywords on YouTube, they will be redirected towards a playlist of curated YouTube videos that directly confront and debunk violent extremist messages. We also continue to amplify YouTube voices speaking out against hate and radicalization through our YouTube Creators for Change program. Just last week, the U.K. chapter of Creators for Change, Internet Citizens, hosted a two-day workshop for 13-18 year-olds to help them find a positive sense of belonging online and learn skills on how to participate safely and responsibly on the internet. We also pledged to expand the program’s reach to 20,000 more teens across the U.K.

And over the weekend, we hosted our latest Creators for Change workshop in Bandung, Indonesia, where creators teamed up with Indonesia’s Maarif Institute to teach young people about the importance of diversity, pluralism, and tolerance.

Altogether, we have taken significant steps over the last month in our fight against online terrorism. But this is not the end. We know there is always more work to be done. With the help of new machine learning technology, deep partnerships, ongoing collaborations with other companies through the Global Internet Forum, and our vigilant community we are confident we can continue to make progress against this ever-changing threat. We look forward to sharing more with you in the months ahead.

The YouTube Team

This gonna be gud.
 
Also, this isn't likely to change ANYONE'S mind about refugees

That's the point, their #REFUGEESWELCOME propaganda videos they put on their front page aren't enough, now they have to censor the opposing side speaking the truth about the refugees. As long as less people hear about 'controversial' opinions on refugees, less people will understand the problem they bring to Europe.
 
That's the point, their #REFUGEESWELCOME propaganda videos they put on their front page aren't enough, now they have to censor the opposing side speaking the truth about the refugees. As long as less people hear about 'controversial' opinions on refugees, less people will understand the problem they bring to Europe.

You would think that the sheer amount of down votes on that Refugee video propaganda bullshit would have let them know that people wouldn't like this shit, but nope. Seems like they are correct tho. Remember when Gab.ai or whatever it is was going to "Bring down Twitter with Freeze Peach!!!" I don't think it has exactly, has it? Also, the vid.me is not too popular, except for mirroring videos that YouTube keeps pulling down (I think?)

Can you imagine having Google shut you down like this? More then half of smart phone owners use an Android phone, what will they do if their accounts shut down? What about Google Wallet accounts? Or even cash in gift certificate form in their Google Play account? Do we wave goodbye as they hand it to the Anti Defamation League as a payout for their work?
 
That's the point, their #REFUGEESWELCOME propaganda videos they put on their front page aren't enough, now they have to censor the opposing side speaking the truth about the refugees. As long as less people hear about 'controversial' opinions on refugees, less people will understand the problem they bring to Europe.

Well if this continues, then the Deus Vult people will gain legitimacy and a true massacre will be seen for continuing to repress unpopular opinions is a great way to keep things peachy.
 
This could be the beginning of the end for youtube. Or the Normies will still go for clips of Talks shows,music videos, & "acceptable" content and keep the site afloat.
The majority of Youtube traffic has always seemed to be music, and clips from movies and TV show's. They'll probably do just fine with less political commentary.
 
Wait...What? What world am I living in when political propaganda like this acceptable? If YT subtly shifted your results from searching about atheism to videos about accepting Jesus and Catholicism, there would be an uproar. Why is this only acceptable when the left does it?

Also, this isn't likely to change ANYONE'S mind about refugees. In fact, I'm gonna wager that'll it make more people against them. The media here has already done a good job of it by their refusal to place blame on Islam when we have terrorist attacks. Almost everyone I know thinks it's absolute bullshit to not call a spade a spade. And YT already had to eat crow with their refugee and pride month sponsored videos with a couple hundred thousand dislikes. Why push their luck any further?

You're living in the world where the dominant ideology for the upper class is rapidly losing ground so they're flailing left, right, and center to do anything to contain it.
 
If we've learned nothing from the last 5 years it's that no Website is too big to fail.

Nice to know that after Livejournal tried this, nobody learned a fucking thing.

Oh yeah, that's right, this opens YouTube up for liability lawsuits for anything on the site now that they're curating the space.
 
Oh, hey, it's another attempt at removing and limiting perfectly legal content over ideological differences. An attempt which will, no doubt, be justified by enlightened redditors as "It's a private company, they can do whatever they want".

I've already seen those comments popping up, especially on Gawker-owned sites. While it's true that Youtube's policies don't breach the First Amendment (since YouTube is a private company and not the government), that doesn't mean that their actions aren't censorship and should be defended. When a company as big as Youtube is blatantly pushing censorship and propaganda, you should be angry and worried.

Of course, the people on Reddit and Gawker will only complain if these policies start to prevent their opinions from being heard.
 
I've already seen those comments popping up, especially on Gawker-owned sites. While it's true that Youtube's policies don't breach the First Amendment (since YouTube is a private company and not the government), that doesn't mean that their actions aren't censorship and should be defended. When a company as big as Youtube is blatantly pushing censorship and propaganda, you should be angry and worried.

Of course, the people on Reddit and Gawker will only complain if these policies start to prevent their opinions from being heard.
That's the irony of it all.
 
Whenever stuff like this happens there's plenty of salt coming from both sides. The left's reaction will be "Youtube is a right wing evil Zionist White Supremacist corporation." the Right's reaction will consist of "Youtube is being overrun by leftist SJW's who hate freedom of speech".
For once, they are right about YouTube being run by money hungry idiots. Not surprised they can't decide on what kind of idiot.
 
Back