YouTube will “protect free expression” by pulling back on content moderation - YouTube says it is still committed to preventing harm.

1.webp
Credit: Getty Images

YouTube videos may be getting a bit more pernicious soon. Google's dominant video platform has spent years removing discriminatory and conspiracy content from its platform in accordance with its usage guidelines, but the site is now reportedly adopting a lighter-touch approach to moderation. A higher bar for content removal will allow more potentially inflammatory content to remain up in the "public interest."

YouTube has previously attracted the ire of conservatives for its removal of QAnon and anti-vaccine content. According to The New York Times, YouTube's content moderators have been provided with new guidelines and training on how to handle the deluge of provocative content on the platform. The changes urge reviewers to pull back on removing certain videos, a continuation of a trend not just at YouTube, but on numerous platforms that host user-created content.

Beginning late last year, YouTube began informing moderators they should err on the side of caution when removing videos that are in the public interest. That includes user uploads that discuss issues like elections, race, gender, sexuality, abortion, immigration, and censorship. Previously, YouTube's policy told moderators to remove videos if one-quarter or more of the content violated policies. Now, the exception cutoff has been increased to half. In addition, staff are now told to bring issues to managers if they are uncertain rather than removing the content themselves.

"Recognizing that the definition of 'public interest' is always evolving, we update our guidance for these exceptions to reflect the new types of discussion we see on the platform today," YouTube's Nicole Bell told the Times. "Our goal remains the same: to protect free expression on YouTube while mitigating egregious harm."

The report includes several examples of videos that are now allowed under YouTube's policy, including one titled, "RFK Jr. Delivers SLEDGEHAMMER Blows to Gene-Altering JABS." This is, of course, an example of medical misinformation, as there is zero evidence that mRNA vaccines can alter a person's DNA. However, YouTube's moderation team was instructed to allow the video to remain up because the public interest "outweighs the harm risk."

2.webp
Vaccine and health care conspiracies promoted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could get a boost with YouTube's new policies.
Credit: Getty Images | Washington Post

Policy change​

There have been several notable shifts in how online platforms manage content since the reelection of Donald Trump last November. For several years, conservative voices have framed content moderation on sites like YouTube and Facebook as censorship. With MAGA Republicans in power, there is concern in the tech industry that such an outlook could become the basis for government action against websites. Not long after the election, Meta announced the end of its fact-checking system, and Twitter famously changed course immediately after being purchased by right-wing billionaire Elon Musk. Even before November, YouTube loosened restrictions on election-related content. Again, this was done in the "public interest."

YouTube contends that most of the videos it hosts are not affected by this change. "These exceptions apply to a small fraction of the videos on YouTube, but are vital for ensuring important content remains available," a YouTube spokesperson tells Ars. "This practice allows us to prevent, for example, an hours-long news podcast from being removed for showing one short clip of violence."

While it's unclear how often YouTube traps viewers in conspiracy spirals, the effect could escalate with this change. No matter how small the fraction is, many of the accounts most apt to publish controversial content are big names on the platform.

Article Link

Archive
 
Does this mean that 99.9% of my comments will stop being instantly removed the second I post them despite zero slurs or violent language?
This shit is infuriating, especially on a phone browser where you have absolutely no way of knowing if the moderation AI gobbled up your comment unless you’re insane enough to scroll and find it manually. It seems to work on some internal bad boy score that decays over time. Not a good enough boy? Even the most innocuous comment gets hellbanned or silently deleted. Good Boy Points hit a hidden threshold? Drop hard r’s and troons like they’re going out of style. The result is everyone uses gay as fuck safespeak euphemisms like “unalive” lest the AI dock their good boy points.

Possibly the worst comment moderation system I’ve ever seen deployed at scale.
 
But they still won't do anything about the awful scam or sexual advertisements or fix the bots in peoples comments sections... or allow ad blockers.
Also, they still keep trying to block frontends from accessing the vids through something better than the YT crapsite. Not only that, but YT can do a lot of wear and tear on drives: even with caching disabled, watching a vid on YT can mean at least a few MB of cache data written to the drive (I imagine it's far worse with browser cache enabled).
 
Also, they still keep trying to block frontends from accessing the vids through something better than the YT crapsite. Not only that, but YT can do a lot of wear and tear on drives: even with caching disabled, watching a vid on YT can mean at least a few MB of cache data written to the drive (I imagine it's far worse with browser cache enabled).
I have noticed the UI to be super buggy lately too. Pressing the like button wont do anything so I have to refresh the page. When you pause the video now recommended videos pop up over the video currently playing so when I click to unpause I accidentally click off to a new video. Also noticed that it might be just to fuck with ad block users but auto play is turned on for me and I can't turn it off as well and timestamps don't work and the time line bar appears all red for me. Fuck those google niggers
 
But they still won't do anything about the awful scam or sexual advertisements or fix the bots in peoples comments sections... or allow ad blockers.

I noticed that on my TV, when I leave for work and play cat relaxation videos in guest mode, its always some attention grabbing upskirt thumbnail about "FAILS." so it can't even tell if I'm over 18 and is putting that in the first line of suggested videos.
 
Great. Can content cunts finally say words like, died, suicide, death, etc. again, instead of unalive?
 
I'll believe it when I see it. I'd just as well rather see them crack down on the bots and whatsapp/Telegram scammers that infest every single comment section. Allowing for creator-level blocking and filters would help clean that up significantly.

In Harris in the White House timeline, YT would be keeping up that censorious and soy "Community Guidelines" -- or even increase them.
I often shudder in horror just thinking about how much worse things could have been had the winds blown the opposite direction this past election. Had the Dems seized power, I firmly believe that the draconian clampdown on anything even slightly conservative would have been far worse. And I believe that people like Joe Rogan, Steven Crowder and Elon Musk would have been completely unpersoned. I wouldn't doubt that the dems would have seriously tried to seize all of SpaceX and other Elon assets for "national security reasons". These people are dyed in the wool communists.
Yeah and the zuck supports freeze peach now too. He's also really, really sorry now that the people he was censoring are in power. I hope they burn.
Fuck the Zuck. Even now, they still crack down on any sort of perceived wrongthink. PL: I lost a mildly popular account recently that had nothing to do with politics or ideology whatsoever, with no reason or recourse. It's led to actual financial repercussions.
 
I often shudder in horror just thinking about how much worse things could have been had the winds blown the opposite direction this past election.
And can you imagine how bad illegal immigration, that increase in crime along with illegal immigration, and pushing LGBTQWERTYUIOP+ on children could've gotten in the Harris timeline? How much more loony the loony left could've gotten with made-up "problematic" issues? Not only that, but the Democrats may have "never lost" an election ever again after Harris would've won (or "won"). YouTube in the "Harris in White House" timeline could've made Current Year YouTube before 2024 look like "the Wild West" in comparison.
 
Last edited:
'Harm' is the shitlib version of heresy.
It used to be just that, now?

Its their version of "icky" - if it makes them uncomfortable? It's an attack, and an attack is always meant to harm, so by getting rid of it? They're not being censorious, their being heroic!
 
They are only doing this because they face competition from platforms like Bitchute Rumble and Odysee. I will be honest though I don't really miss all the Boomer schizo conspiritard garbage spam that used to happen on old YouTube. Most of that stuff moved over to Bitchute and that's about all that's on there. If you look at the recent uploads on Bitchute it's just Boomer schizo conspiritard nonsense. It would be nice if we could find the David Irving lectures on YouTube again stuff like Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told and videos about the USS Liberty. There is a channel on YouTube I found a while back called Zoomer Historian and he uploads good videos and managed to keep them milquetoast enough to get past the YouTube censorship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smar Mijou
Youtube is so bad they could cut tone down their censorship algorithm by three quarters and it would still be of the most dogshit sites on the web to try to reply to something. Its almost as hard to comment anything on there than reddit except you won't get permabanned , just passively agressively shadowbanned.

Completely normal opinions relevant to the topic get deleted meanwhile indians and AI spambots can fill all the fake engagement they want to prop up AI slop and elsagate videos all they want.
 
Back