Which is astonishing because being a drama commentator is, in my opinion, one of the easiest thing to do on Earth.
All you have to do is spoon-feed the viewers with informations on the subject unfolding, maybe give your own take, make a couple of jokes, and that's it.
The only parts that requires some semblance of effort is finding reliable sources and asking those the information you're going to regurgitate on the video later. But that only means that you have to just ask people around, as if you were a parody of an old-school journalist.
To connect to the Critikal/Penguinz thing: when he talks drama, you can obviously see he talks out of his ass with minimal to absolute no research on the issue whatsoever. Although that can be said when he talks about most topics.
This video in particular is
terrible:
"
I know nothing about art and the world surrounding it, so I'm going to assume that any form of criticism is toxicity or bullyism," what a dumbass. At least do some research first. What he calls toxic/bully behaviour is just the standard, the comment was actually fairly polite, despite claiming (and showing) that he could do it better after being challenged by the same bootlicker from before. This is something common, even with ancient painters, there are examples of people doing the same piece but with their own styles to prove that their school of thought was the superior one.
And honestly, I prefer this to the hypocritical approach some people take, showering you with compliments at first and then pointing all of the technical mistakes or personal distastes behind your back, which is becoming the standard now.
This statement can be applied to nearly all of the lolcows. Social Media and Social Networks are cancer.