🔥 Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

If you really had to who would you sex?

  • Total voters
    4,097
brutal poodle said:
Akela responds directly to @s0mbra herself.
View attachment 1490142
Twitter | Archive

The post he’s responding to:
View attachment 1490149
Click to expand...
Oral/anal rape "questionable at best???" So, it's okay sometimes?
"Non-practicing???" So, if akela gets a new dog tomorrow, that could change in a heartbeat
Screenshot_Opera_Mini_20200730-154209.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
logintoilet said:
My guesses are 1) he's lying 2) worthless degree and not actually employed anywhere, just pretending
Click to expand...
I don't want to totally refute your point, and I get that "haha furries can't keep a job lol" is sort of the joke of the fandom, but the idea of a psychiatric therapist being a closet zoo and dogfucker is hardly impossible. We had a furry who buys thousands of dollars worth of Fox McCloud/Falco macro porn who also happens to be a neurosurgeon; education and occupation are not disqualifying factors for someone being a secret degenerate.

I'm hoping that he's lying and/or it's a worthless degree and he's overstating his importance, but let's not forget that zoosadist Kintari was a vet tech which requires a minimum 2 year bachelors degree to qualify and that he used his position to get sedatives for the other zoosadists. It would not be a stretch for a therapist operating in California to be a little too accepting of some of their patients' fetishes, to the point of encouraging them to continue jerking off to dog porn in the name of "self care".
 
Did some light digging regarding sethpup. Haven't found anything major yet. Is their nudes still available? There's a chance I found a face pic, but I need to do comparisons. Below are links. Unable to archive atm

Formatting is being weird. Unable to use url to text.
OP claims to know someond that knows Seth. Take his word with a grain of salt. Apparently, he upped hard smut and cub under the Sashabelle alias. But deleted all that content while moving to the US? This part is likely bullshit.
www.patreon.com

Team Nimbus is creating Cloud Meadow, an adult monster-breeding game! | Patreon

Become a patron of Team Nimbus today: Read 1534 posts by Team Nimbus and get access to exclusive content and experiences on the world’s largest membership platform for artists and creators.
www.patreon.com www.patreon.com
Seth worked for Team Nimbus from October 2017-July 2018
Born on May 26th
He's 29. So 5/26/1991 is his DOB
From Portland. Not sure where he lives now. Whenever I look up his aliases,,Wisconsin/Milwaukee come up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HotPockets said:
More evidence against akela, who is totally 'non practising' but also in favor of Jerking off dogs.... But only for the *dogs* benefit, guys
Click to expand...
A lot of zoos unfortunately also like claiming that jerking off animals is totally fine because "people do it all the time for animal husbandry" when that's simply a false equivalence at best.

While it's true that jerking off animals it is often done for the sake of husbandry, I think a person's motives do go a fair bit into why a random pet owner doing it for sexual gratification is extremely inappropriate vs. someone doing it for the purposes of controlled reproduction is not.

Someone jerking off a horse (for example) to get sperm samples for artificial insemination has a purpose beyond just individual gratification; mares can get injured during mating by overaggressive stallions, which increases risk of infection or distress and even miscarriage; it allows the owner to send seminal samples for testing in case of infertility or genetic issues; even freezing for later use if the stallion needs to be gelded for any reason. It's not done because it gets the animal off. It's done explicitly for the medical health of not only the animal the sample is collected from, but also the animal that sperm sample might be provided to later in order to bear healthy offspring. It's a safer method of animal husbandry that allows the owner more control over exactly which animals reproduce and when, which can be critically important for horses and other herd animals that typically need to be kept together in social groups.

That is a very different context and purpose than just letting an animal cum in your mouth for pleasure. Most people who do animal husbandry this way typically have some training and know that jerking the animal off with your bare, bacteria-covered hands is a bad idea that is prone to increase a risk of infection; some breeders who don't give a fuck might do things that way, but if they're that shitty they probably just let their animals fuck naturally and never bother consider spaying/gelding/neutering them, let alone going through the additional costs of equipment and testing for artificial insemination.
 
Pukebucket said:
A lot of zoos unfortunately also like claiming that jerking off animals is totally fine because "people do it all the time for animal husbandry" when that's simply a false equivalence at best.

While it's true that jerking off animals it is often done for the sake of husbandry, I think a person's motives do go a fair bit into why a random pet owner doing it for sexual gratification is extremely inappropriate vs. someone doing it for the purposes of controlled reproduction is not.

Someone jerking off a horse (for example) to get sperm samples for artificial insemination has a purpose beyond just individual gratification; mares can get injured during mating by overaggressive stallions, which increases risk of infection or distress and even miscarriage; it allows the owner to send seminal samples for testing in case of infertility or genetic issues; even freezing for later use if the stallion needs to be gelded for any reason. It's not done because it gets the animal off. It's done explicitly for the medical health of not only the animal the sample is collected from, but also the animal that sperm sample might be provided to later in order to bear healthy offspring. It's a safer method of animal husbandry that allows the owner more control over exactly which animals reproduce and when, which can be critically important for horses and other herd animals that typically need to be kept together in social groups.

That is a very different context and purpose than just letting an animal cum in your mouth for pleasure. Most people who do animal husbandry this way typically have some training and know that jerking the animal off with your bare, bacteria-covered hands is a bad idea that is prone to increase a risk of infection; some breeders who don't give a fuck might do things that way, but if they're that shitty they probably just let their animals fuck naturally and never bother consider spaying/gelding/neutering them, let alone going through the additional costs of equipment and testing for artificial insemination.
Click to expand...
Not to mention I'm pretty sure most breeders are using a device / machine for that instead of their hands since the human hand can cause damage to the genitals via infection.
 
Pukebucket said:
A lot of zoos unfortunately also like claiming that jerking off animals is totally fine because "people do it all the time for animal husbandry" when that's simply a false equivalence at best.

While it's true that jerking off animals it is often done for the sake of husbandry, I think a person's motives do go a fair bit into why a random pet owner doing it for sexual gratification is extremely inappropriate vs. someone doing it for the purposes of controlled reproduction is not.

Someone jerking off a horse (for example) to get sperm samples for artificial insemination has a purpose beyond just individual gratification; mares can get injured during mating by overaggressive stallions, which increases risk of infection or distress and even miscarriage; it allows the owner to send seminal samples for testing in case of infertility or genetic issues; even freezing for later use if the stallion needs to be gelded for any reason. It's not done because it gets the animal off. It's done explicitly for the medical health of not only the animal the sample is collected from, but also the animal that sperm sample might be provided to later in order to bear healthy offspring. It's a safer method of animal husbandry that allows the owner more control over exactly which animals reproduce and when, which can be critically important for horses and other herd animals that typically need to be kept together in social groups.

That is a very different context and purpose than just letting an animal cum in your mouth for pleasure. Most people who do animal husbandry this way typically have some training and know that jerking the animal off with your bare, bacteria-covered hands is a bad idea that is prone to increase a risk of infection; some breeders who don't give a fuck might do things that way, but if they're that shitty they probably just let their animals fuck naturally and never bother consider spaying/gelding/neutering them, let alone going through the additional costs of equipment and testing for artificial insemination.
Click to expand...

Akela seems to be in the 'pleasure' camp, keeping a dog intact for purposes of pleasure, not about collecting samples or using proper precautions. So all her claims about being 'the good kind of zoophile' are sus. "It's all the OTHER zoos that are the problem!" my ass.
 
HotPockets said:
Akela seems to be in the 'pleasure' camp, keeping a dog intact for purposes of pleasure, not about collecting samples or using proper precautions. So all her claims about being 'the good kind of zoophile' are sus. "It's all the OTHER zoos that are the problem!" my ass.
Click to expand...
Well yeah, absolutely. Ultimately that's the biggest problem with zoos claiming they are doing what they do for the "benefit of the animal"; the animal may enjoy a few moments of physical pleasure (assuming they're even the type of animal that is capable of enjoying sex beyond just responding to reproductive hormonal spikes), but they still cannot adequately comprehend risks such as infection or even really be able to say "no" in a singular, concise fashion. I know there are many zoos who say animals can refuse consent through body language or some shit, but it really depends on the animal and how they're raised and if the person even knows what "body language" is supposed to mark a refusal for sexual engagement; much like certain people, some animals will go along with acts or behaviors they're uncomfortable or unwilling to do to avoid causing conflict or receiving some form of rejection or punishment.

Most animal training is built upon the principal of making an animal trust and look to their owner for guidance and care even if they are put into an uncomfortable or frightening situation; this is why abusing that trust by fucking them (even if the abuser's only interested in getting the animal off for their supposed "benefit") is so insidious. It's coercion masquerading as consent.

We see the argument time and time again from dogfuckers of "oh, if the animal didn't like it he'd bite!" as if dogs aren't raised from an early age to not bite people on principal. As if dogs haven't been bred (especially common pets) not to bite family members through domestication for literal centuries. As if they aren't constantly discouraged from barking or howling or making other forms of noise for the sake of disturbing nearby neighbors or other people in the house.

How the fuck are you supposed to have an assurance of consent from an organism that is bred, raised, and encouraged into going along with whatever you decide is right for it.
 
HotPockets said:
Oral/anal rape "questionable at best???" So, it's okay sometimes?
"Non-practicing???" So, if akela gets a new dog tomorrow, that could change in a heartbeat

Click to expand...
“Especially if you’re worried about the dog hurting you”
These people are so fucking selfish. Never mind (anally) raping a creature, as well as the total mindfuck of being hurt by a person they grow to love and trust.

And the holier-than-thou bullshit that fucking a dog is a higher level of love and companionship. These people don’t give a shit about the well-being, mental or physical health at all.

Just once, I want to hear about some reprobate getting their nads chewed off, they deserve nothing less.
🎩🎩🎩
 
Pukebucket said:
We had a furry who buys thousands of dollars worth of Fox McCloud/Falco macro porn who also happens to be a neurosurgeon
Click to expand...
That story may not be true.
From a few years ago in the Zaush thread -
Rhysuu said:
I know this is completely off-topic but from somebody really deep in the Star Fox fandom the idea that Togepi1125 is a lawyer/surgeon in HK is a rumor that was started by westerners as a joke. Togepi1125 himself on Twitter has stated that this is not the case, he makes a normal wage and manages his money to set aside the equivalent of $1,000 - $1,500 a month to commission artwork. He said that he lives alone and saves money wherever possible to try and reserve it for his special interests.
Click to expand...
Not sure about the twitter post mentioned, but this is from their Fur affinity -

imagefourfive.png

Going to bet on it being a rumor started years ago.
 
brutal poodle said:
I regret to inform you guys that there is more zoosadist Sethpup art. Also I have the uncensored images from the original tweets as well.
View attachment 1489915View attachment 1489919View attachment 1489920View attachment 1489921View attachment 1492012View attachment 1492013View attachment 1492014View attachment 1492015View attachment 1492016View attachment 1492017View attachment 1492018
View attachment 1492008View attachment 1492009View attachment 1492010View attachment 1492009View attachment 1492010View attachment 1492011
View attachment 1489916View attachment 1489917View attachment 1489918[/SPOILER]
Click to expand...
I updated this post to include all the images found in the u18 thread. I have a feeling there is more out there but I think we have all the evidence we need.

One last thing I would like to point out: a lot of the dogs in these drawings are fucking puppies.

01D7CF1E-0204-46F9-A696-AACCE50F62CA.jpeg

I just hope Seth truly doesn’t rape his dachsund. :( From the sound of this it sounds like he abuses him.
 
Last edited:
Anderson's Phone said:
Zoofag claiming to be a therapist in West Hollywood. If he's not lying that should be easy to narrow him down you can find lists of every registered therapist in West Hollywood (guess this guy thinks no one would every want to go after him)

Archive.org link
Click to expand...
Now he's just saying shit like this which makes the fandom even madder. Sad part is this guy is 100% serious with how he acts.
Screenshot_2020-08-03 Home Twitter(1).png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Furries being open with their degeneracy is nothing new, even on those levels. I've recently been on a watch myself, because (slight powerlevel) one of my family members - a minor - has been going through various furry chats. Even places that are supposedly "sfw" always link to or have nsfw jokes and porn, drawn or not.

Telegram chats are particularly and perpetually making me nauseous. Usually I would say "you wouldn't believe the shit that gets posted there", but we're on the zoosadism thread.

Furries thrive on grooming minors and exposing them to zoophilia/pedophilia, but as it was mentiomed once in this thread - some are just more stupid and open about it than others. Either way, every single one of them slips up eventually.
 
Semen Demon said:
Furries being open with their degeneracy is nothing new, even on those levels. I've recently been on a watch myself, because (slight powerlevel) one of my family members - a minor - has been going through various furry chats. Even places that are supposedly "sfw" always link to or have nsfw jokes and porn, drawn or not.

Telegram chats are particularly and perpetually making me nauseous. Usually I would say "you wouldn't believe the shit that gets posted there", but we're on the zoosadism thread.

Furries thrive on grooming minors and exposing them to zoophilia/pedophilia, but as it was mentiomed once in this thread - some are just more stupid and open about it than others. Either way, every single one of them slips up eventually.
Click to expand...
I don't know whether to keep my Winner rating or change it to Feels, because this is both very true and terrifying. Best of luck to keeping your younger sibling away from furfag degeneracy. Godspeed.
 
Semen Demon said:
Furries being open with their degeneracy is nothing new, even on those levels. I've recently been on a watch myself, because (slight powerlevel) one of my family members - a minor - has been going through various furry chats. Even places that are supposedly "sfw" always link to or have nsfw jokes and porn, drawn or not.

Telegram chats are particularly and perpetually making me nauseous. Usually I would say "you wouldn't believe the shit that gets posted there", but we're on the zoosadism thread.

Furries thrive on grooming minors and exposing them to zoophilia/pedophilia, but as it was mentiomed once in this thread - some are just more stupid and open about it than others. Either way, every single one of them slips up eventually.
Click to expand...
There are no fully SFW furry chats. If it’s a “minor only sfw furry chat” I’d personally be even more suspicious because there will be pedos lurking. The foundation of the furry fandom is held upon of furry porn. If it were my kid, I’d limit the sites he’s able to go on by banning some domains. Definitely ban all porn sites and especially e621.
 
brutal poodle said:
There are no fully SFW furry chats. If it’s a “minor only sfw furry chat” I’d personally be even more suspicious because there will be pedos lurking. The foundation of the furry fandom is held upon of furry porn. If it were my kid, I’d limit the sites he’s able to go on by banning some domains. Definitely ban all porn sites and especially e621.
Click to expand...

Definitely. Maybe I should be more desensitized to it all by now, but goddamn, I always get that sinking gut feeling when I see kids pulled in or groomed. It's just so damn tragic that actual 14yo's can get entwined into this, without feeling like they have anywhere to go - what, you're gonna tell your mom you're in a pedo telegram chat that's "zoosadism friendly"?

They just have this real slick way of pulling in kids and sugarcoating themselves, I'll admit even I got tricked initially. If you see a random furry on a con, maybe you'll have some positive interaction. It's what's going on behind closed doors that you start to realize it's just full of sick fucks and maybe 6 relatively normal people.

Call me a bleeding heart but I'm incredibly happy that this thread, and others that spawned from it, exist, archive and keep on updating. Thanks to that and everyone who contributed, I've been able to take better care of the few poor younglings in my family that just think drawing colorful dogs is fun. Semper fi to you all :semperfidelis:
 
Just Another Furgag Alog said:
Also saw someone mention that Seth is friends with "Cenny", which a bit of googling suggests is "CennyButt" / "CennyAD", who apparently got a mention on here for defending zoophilia.
Click to expand...
Holy Shit!, I know the guy, not personally, but through a bunch of others. He's personal friends with a bunch of Vancoufur Staff. Bunch of local popufurs. I think, (but not certain) he hangs out with the "TailBase" crew, a furhouse. And he might still work for Telus.
Cenny Dox (circa 2014).png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom