🔥 Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    4,097
Knowing Neer he's deleting and banning anyone who brings it up. I suspect that eventually we'll see furries on twitter talking about getting banned for it or at the least, warned.

Neer knows that nobody forgot that he warned dogfuckers about criminal investigations against them so the whole policy is quite hypocritical of him.
 
Furaffinity has updated thier TOS, most likely in response to the continued awareness of the zoosadism leaks.



Note that Dragoneer is a coward with dogfucker friends, so there's no outright statement against dogfucking. You could argue that it's included under 'torture', but dogfuckers honestly believe they aren't hurting their animals so thus will ignore it.

The journal announcing the rule change has comments disabled. Either he locked it before hand knowing that people are going to complain about lack of rules against zoophiles, or people were already yelling about it and Dragoneer cowardly nuked the comments so he can pretend he's doing a good.
Isn’t dog diddling discussion already banned under rule 1.2?
1.2 Do not discuss violent or sexual crimes.
Do not discuss details or experiences of committing, illegal acts involving sex, violence, or abuse against any creature, living or dead. Recounting and taking responsibility for past history may be permitted at staff discretion provided that harmful or illegal acts are not cast in a positive light.
 
Isn’t dog diddling discussion already banned under rule 1.2?
Try telling them that and see how far it gets you.

Hint: A ticket response of "we'll look into it" ("it" being the hard evidence you generously provided in both archive and screenshot form) followed by no action being taken.
 
Try telling them that and see how far it gets you.

Hint: A ticket response of "we'll look into it" ("it" being the hard evidence you generously provided in both archive and screenshot form) followed by no action being taken.
Fur Affinity admin process: If it doesn't happen on FA it's not a problem, with the exception of "nazi furs" because stupid bullshit. If it does happen on FA, hey guys keep it down okay problem solved.
 
Ya know this post here on the Mega Thread just kinda solidifies what I said a few weeks ago about you.

View attachment 896524
Either this guy has a severe case of the tism or he is purposefully trying to derail conversations. I'd like to say it's the former to give him the of the doubt, but his continued exceptionalism is kind of suspect. Also he's insistence on the Kero thread for people to "Make a thread on me" comes off as a desperate plea for either

1) To take the attention away from Kero and on to him

or

2) A cry for attention in order to gain dopamine from all the reddit karma
Screenshot (1).png


Either way, this guy is really annoying
 
1567960092737.png


1567960136738.png

 
Can anyone explain why Twitter is siding with zoofuckers and other animal abusers? These cancers on society are constantly being reported and they're still around, but if anyone dare go against them then Twitter nukes your account? What the fuck.
 
Can anyone explain why Twitter is siding with zoofuckers and other animal abusers? These cancers on society are constantly being reported and they're still around, but if anyone dare go against them then Twitter nukes your account? What the fuck.
Mean words aren't allowed.
I'm not even kidding. If you even swear in a tweet it gets semi hidden under "more replies."
 
Can anyone explain why Twitter is siding with zoofuckers and other animal abusers? These cancers on society are constantly being reported and they're still around, but if anyone dare go against them then Twitter nukes your account? What the fuck.

Zoophiles will mass-report accounts that criticize zoophiles. The zoophiles may go to a profile and try to mass report tweets that look like they break Twitter's rules. BeepMareep explains Twitter's AI / how they deal with mass reporting in the MAP/NOMAP thread.
 
Zoophiles will mass-report accounts that criticize zoophiles. The zoophiles may go to a profile and try to mass report tweets that look like they break Twitter's rules. BeepMareep explains Twitter's AI / how they deal with mass reporting in the MAP/NOMAP thread.

How come every fucking time these fucking disgusting pieces of human shit get away with something is just by a mere technicality? JFC i swear to fuck this is exactly why we need to put pressure to fix all this things, its like these retarded specimens only exists freely due to this.



>Zoophilia goes beyond the sexual realm, it is a deep love and caring for animals in general

This scum must be purged, imagine hearing this from a pedophile. Theyre fucking sick
 
How come every fucking time these fucking disgusting pieces of human shit get away with something is just by a mere technicality? JFC i swear to fuck this is exactly why we need to put pressure to fix all this things, its like these exceptional specimens only exists freely due to this.




>Zoophilia goes beyond the sexual realm, it is a deep love and caring for animals in general

This scum must be purged, imagine hearing this from a pedophile. Theyre fucking sick
You da man Kronk.
 
Can anyone explain why Twitter is siding with zoofuckers and other animal abusers? These cancers on society are constantly being reported and they're still around, but if anyone dare go against them then Twitter nukes your account? What the fuck.
Because Twitter is run by robots, not people. Algorithms and lines of code don't have critical thinking skills or the ability to have a moral compass, good or bad. As such, so long as something gets mass reported it assumes that the people reporting them is doing the right thing. Any of the mean words the code picks up will likely count towards banning a user as well. Mind you, the bestialists also get nuked from time to time, so if anything it just proves my point: computers can't make morality decisions. Not to say that having humans go through reports is a flawless system, but the bots have a particularly exploitable nature that can be abused by just about anyone.
 
Cross posting because this belongs here too.

J just found a video of Amy Lynn (Whitney Wisconsin) sucking the miilk out of a pregnant dog's nipples. What the fuck is wrong with people?

 
Cross posting because this belongs here too.

J just found a video of Amy Lynn (Whitney Wisconsin) sucking the miilk out of a pregnant dog's nipples. What the fuck is wrong with people?

Isn't this violating her probation? I remember hearing she wasn't allowed to have an internet presence and she was never allowed to use the Whitney Wisconsin alias again.
 
>Zoophilia goes beyond the sexual realm, it is a deep love and caring for animals in general

This scum must be purged, imagine hearing this from a pedophile. Theyre fucking sick
Once again these freaks have no concept that you can have a deep love, care, and respect for animals without fucking them. Screwing your dog or cat or horse or whatever is not a prerequisite for an emotional connection.

All these zoophiles are utterly fixated on keeping intact animals for their purposes and are voraciously against neutering/spaying/gelding even when it could help the animal in question live longer and more stable lives. Contrary to common belief, fixed animals will still exhibit sexual behaviors to a degree even after being spayed/neutered a lot of the time. It may inhibit sexual function, but it's not exactly unknown for animals to at least attempt to mount one another even when snipped as a dominance behavior. Not that any of these zoos should be screwing clipped critters either, but all of them seem pretty focused on dog cum (possibly a replacement for tard cum here in the animal control thread) to the point of still trying to swallow it even after their system rejects it as a foreign body.

The thing that gets me (I mean all of this gets me to be honest) is zoos will argue for consent while keeping their animals in a hormonal swing until the day they die. This might not be as prevalent with male animals, but these fucks arguing that female animals in heat are capable of consent is nauseating to me. The fact animals go into heat at all is because the risks (pregnancy complications, infections, injury) generally will outweigh the rewards and their reproductive system literally has to jump their hormones way the fuck up to force them to reproduce at "ideal' times, rather than having a general hormonal baseline so they can fuck all the time (see: humans). It's not a fun happy experience for most other animals; it's their system literally overriding their basic needs to demand that they reproduce the next generation. To the point where many of these mammals will literally lose a fuckload of weight and border on malnourished in the wild as their systems prioritize breeding over eating.

Some animals are capable of having sex for pleasure, like dolphins or bonobos, but these fuckers aren't screwing dolphins or bonobos so that whole argument for the "but the animals like it too!" aspect is bunk. There's a reason why animals who go into heat on the reg (even ones who don't get pregnant constantly) die younger on average than those who have been spayed.

If their love was so "twoo and special uwu" then the sexual aspect shouldn't be a goddamn requirement.
 
I'm sure there are sick fucks out there who want to fuck apes and monkeys, but there definitely are people who want to fuck dolphins. Even one of the Bad Dragon people got caught with irl dolphin porn with his damn name on it. Captive ones, no less. Ones that are probably literally mentally ill from boredom/unnatural environments etc (:_(
 
Back
Top Bottom