🔥 Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    4,097
1.png
2.png

3.png
4.png


Be a responsible pet owner.
 
#zoopride is getting a bit of traction from zoophiles.

1572551870405.png


1572551918085.png


1572551975547.png


Meanwhile, another zoophile compares bestiality to internet piracy.
1572552108046.png

 
What makes me happy is that every-time a zoo posts a status update as their threads are full of people calling them degenerates as it should be. Bad things happen when people seal themselves away in echo chambers (which is how we got the zoosadism leaks.) Every time they open their mouths they need to be reminded on how much people loathe their existence. Hopefully, the idea that none of it is normal will eventually leak into someone and push them to get help will happen.

At the above discussion, I've said it before that the furry fandom is complicit in it as the community heads and leaders would rather sweep these under the rug than damage their fandom's precious reputation. You choose to be a furry. It's not like a race or a sex that you can't choose, you willingly become a furry. And thus, you must be aware that you are going to be judged by the behavior of your community. I know it isn't fair, but when your community has always been known as a haven for degenerate sexual actions, you kinda bring it on yourself if you brag about being in said community.

Said stigma will boil to a point that hopefully, people will get sick of it and actively work to clean out their community. I don't see it happening anytime soon, as furcons still keep letting Growley and Sangie join and Dragoneer, the owner of the biggest furry website, constantly covers up crimes he knows about and bans people who talk about it. Of course, 'not all furries' yes, but blame those responsible for causing said stigma instead of people who point it out.

Zoophiles and Pedophiles feel safe in the furry community as it's the asinine collective to 'love and accept all' no matter how harmful they can be. After all, one horrifying degenerate won't want to judge another lest they become judged themselves. It's rather fascinating as a concept at watching the sheer amount of work it takes to cover these things up when it would be easier to just exile the ones responsible.
 
More Volf896 tweets

1572648862209.png


1572648782118.png


1572648842594.png

 
Imagine being this deviant's family - his fucking parents - and he proudly tells you that he abuses and rapes animals :stress: Whilst his family may know about it, there is no fucking way they are accepting of it and this sped is deluding himself to believe anything else. He is the family embarrassment and no doubt everyone distances themselves as much as fucking possible. Imagine knowing you've failed this much as a parent.
 
Lmao get a load of THIS guy...
Screenshot_20191102_001847.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001620.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_000845_com.twitter.android.jpg


Idiot decided to dox himself. Ballsy.
Screenshot_20191102_001244.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001334.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001408.jpg

Screenshot_20191102_001446.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001528.jpg


He then proceeds to disappoint his parents. Got upset when his mom wouldn't let him diddle with the neighborhood kids.
Screenshot_20191102_001657.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001727.jpg
Screenshot_20191102_001754.jpg


Sorry for shit post-formatting.
 
Last edited:
More Volf896 tweets

View attachment 993512

View attachment 993510

View attachment 993511
I think we found @Exigent Circumcisions's twitter.
 
Lmao get a load of THIS guy...
View attachment 993798View attachment 993800View attachment 993806

Idiot decided to dox himself. Ballsy.
View attachment 993810View attachment 993814View attachment 993816
View attachment 993817View attachment 993818

He then proceeds to disappoint his parents. Got upset when his mom wouldn't let him diddle with the neighborhood kids.
View attachment 993823View attachment 993824View attachment 993825

Sorry for shit post-formatting.
Canino1997 2: Transgender Boogaloo coming in hot with the ugliest "pride" flag I've ever fucking seen in my life.

Really though, what the hell is this person thinking? That because his parents were okay with him being trans that they'd be okay with him thinking about fucking children and dead animals? Pretty damning that his profile only says no-contact on pedophillia; necro and beastiality are awwright and probably have been done before in some capacity.

I have so many questions about this person, each more nauseating than the last;
-Is he only attracted to animals when they're dead? Or is killing them part of it?
-Does he believe in humane euthanasia practices for killing animals for sexual gratification, or is torture part of it and he's also a zoosadist on the side?
-Does he they just wait around for roadkill like our boy Canino? Is this a blowfly girl situation?
-What the fuck do you mean you're "in therapy", are you getting help for this issue specifically?
(If Drakoraider is in therapy, then godspeed I guess; at least he's theoretically trying to crawl out of this pit he's fallen into, which is more than nearly every other necro/zoo/pedo in this thread. That said, this is much more likely to be a situation where his therapist is taking the simple path by just prescribing him some meds and letting him ramble about his fetish to fill out a timeslot without actually talking critically about it at all, and homeboy up there is using therapy as a false flag to pretend he's getting proper treatment for his issues.

It's worth noting that the flag specifically has colors for death (edgy) flesh (pink) red (also edgy) and cream (bone); this would imply recently deceased is his preference, rather than something that's been around for a while (which would probably be like pea soup green and grey blue or something equally ugly).

Tl;dr, this guy might be future thread material all on his own. Good job OP.
 
More Volf896 tweets

View attachment 993512

View attachment 993510

View attachment 993511
The amount of rationalism this animal fucker has to deploy to justify his degenerate and immoral acts of raping puppies is just staggering. I got so annoyed, I had to read up some shit.

No, pets cannot fucking consent, animals can't consent.

1. Power dynamics
Similar to how a child cannot consent, animals can't. The power dynamics makes consent impossible. While a 13 or 14-year-old nowadays obviously have a concept of sexual intercourse and reproduction, they still cannot adequately consent given the power structure involved, unless among their own age brackets.
The pet owner essentially cares and owns the pet. This power difference is staggering, more so than a child and an adult even. Animals have no concept of human structures such as consent.

This is also why maid rape is a thing. The power dynamics are too drastic, making the victim feel pressured. Just because the victim reluctantly has sex with his or her boss doesn't make it not rape.

This is also why many zoos are also paedophiles, aka pedozoos. It's simple, both paedophiles and zoophiles have no concept of consent.


2. Dogs hump to assert dominance
When dogs hump, it is believed they are trying to assert dominance. Does this give the owners the signal that dogfucking is ok? Fuck no. Dogs are simple minded creatures, they are not aware of the power structures, just like a child! A grown dog's IQ is equivalent to a 12-year-old, I believe. This is based on the average cognitive abilities of dogs. Dogs can do very simple math, dogs can be trained to put a white ball into a while basket and black ball into a black basket (they don't mix!). Dogs recognise strangers, dogs can perform simple tasks. A 12yo is essentially similar to a dog. Is fucking a 12yo ok? Then why is fucking a dog ok?


3. Dogs hump to procreate
This is simple. When a dog humps a human, it expects a result. The dog perceived a signal for mating, or it just felt like it. It doesn't need to be stated that humans and dogs cannot produce fucking offspring. The animal expects a pup yet there is no pup, what do we call this... exploitation?

To go as far as to manufacture conditions which will invoke a sexual from an animal is beyond disgusting.

4. Dogs can sense sexual attraction
Obviously they can, but since dogs can also recognise strangers, does this mean they will sense sexual affiliation with other species? Very likely not.
a) If they can, this means the dog is as simple minded as a child, making sex with them immoral, therefore it's rape.
b) If they can't, then it's rape.

5. Animals are capable in rape
Rape exists even in the animal kingdom. Dolphins and ducks do it. Dogs are able to rape humans, why? Because the dog has no concept of human consent! There are stories where the dog rapes its owner, this further goes to demonstrate that dogs cannot consent.

tl;dr animals cannot consent, execute those who rape animals.

I can't believe that I spent nearly 2 hours "researching" animal consent. I want to stab my eyeballs out. I did come across something incredibly interesting... I'm going to archive everything before dropping it. Time to pour bleach into my eyeballs, let there be another gay news article featuring farms abuse leading to suicide... jk.
 
Also what exactly is the difference between a zoosadist and a zoophile? One abuses animals, the other abuses then kills them? How exactly is it better to abuse an animal? This is like comparing killing 5 to killing 8, I guess 8 > 5?

The difference is one of them puts their dog out of their misery and the other one forces them to suffer through it. Personally think the names should be switched around.
 
The US is one step closer to passing a bill that makes animal crush videos a federal crime. Of course, zoos on Twitter try to distinguish the bill's language from their own degeneracy:
Capture+_2019-11-06-14-57-34.png
If you actually read the bill, which none of these morons actually did, it states that animal crushing is defined as "actual conduct in which 1 or more [animals] is intentionally crushed, burned, drowned, suffocated, impaled, or otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury…". I think their argument is that "the bill does not say explicitly say fucking your dog is illegal so it is okay".

I don't see the difference in an animal getting bodily injured from sexual assault that can cause significant harm. they are dumb.
 
The US is one step closer to passing a bill that makes animal crush videos a federal crime. Of course, zoos on Twitter try to distinguish the bill's language from their own degeneracy:
View attachment 1000000
If you actually read the bill, which none of these morons actually did, it states that animal crushing is defined as "actual conduct in which 1 or more [animals] is intentionally crushed, burned, drowned, suffocated, impaled, or otherwise subjected to serious bodily injury…". I think their argument is that "the bill does not say explicitly say fucking your dog is illegal so it is okay".

I don't see the difference in an animal getting bodily injured from sexual assault that can cause significant harm. they are dumb.
A bit late. The law was passed by the House on the 22nd of October and got passed by the Senate about 19 hours ago. Haven't you been reading this thread in the past few weeks? We spoke about this in depth, but I guess it's nice to see some of the zoophiles' salty reactions.
 
Very late. The law was passed a on the 22nd of October. Haven't you been reading this thread in the past few weeks? We spoke about this in depth, but I guess it's nice to see some of the zoophiles' salty reactions.
I am sry if I missed out on the discussion but sometimes I lose which part of the thread I am even at because it's 98% honeypot 2% information.
 
I am sry if I missed out on the discussion but sometimes I lose which part of the thread I am even at because it's 98% honeypot 2% information.
There's still the exclusion of "hunting purposes" which no doubt these dogfuckers will try to exploit.

"I wasn't raping my puppy, we were just hunting" -- says the Zoofur.
"I wasn't raping that deer corpse, I just blew its brains out, I'm a hunter" -- says the zoosadist.
 
WintergreenWolf is back on Twitter as @MrZetaZ1
1573596574636.png


He's got a Gab account now.
1573596542076.png


1573596655548.png

archive doesn't show the page.
 
WintergreenWolf is back on Twitter as @MrZetaZ1
View attachment 1007358

He's got a Gab account now.
View attachment 1007357

View attachment 1007360
archive doesn't show the page.
The Gab community will totally welcome this dogfucker with open arms, nobody will utilise Gab's liberal speech laws and tell him to kill himself.
(There's another meaning to arms)
 
15 And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.

16 And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
 
Back
Top Bottom