🔥 Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

If you really had to who would you sex?

  • Total voters
    4,097
I genuinely cannot tell whether that's good infosec or just standard furry naming/avatar conventions but... Christ above, that's fucking generic. No wonder these fuckers are slippery, they blend into the background noise of random furry bullshit.
 
RotFly said:
Hello, first time posting on this site. I won't go into details, but i have an account on an non-mainstreem adult site. I have some videos on this site, nothing with me in it and nothing to werid, but some videos that attract some weirdos. Unfortuanly this person wanted to add me, i rejected them and told them that they are a subhuman - i don't like people who are into "crush" videos anyway - but then i noticed that they are saying that they have videos of bigger creatures being "crushed" on their telegram.

I don't know where else i could post this so i thought that you guys might want to take a look, i did report him to the site and said that i was going to (but looking into it, there is no way to) the police. I doubt the site will do anything since hes been up for a year with this crap on and they have had rats and stuff being crushed and eaten untill i reported them.

Then i remembered zoosadism and the whole outcome of that, i do not use telegram and do not have the guts to look up this guy on telegram but i thought that you guys might be intrested in at least getting his account shut down?

I cannot archive the site for some reason, the wayback mahcine does not work since i assume that its an adult site, but i have provided the link and some screen shots. I also have posted his profile photo, i am not sure if he created it or just stole it from somewhere. I am not sure if he also uses his telegram account name as a user name but some stuff has come up like a twitch channal. You need an account to see his profile bio on "ThisVids"

I am sorry if this is a bad quallity post, this is the first time i posted on this site.

His telegram account is called: @xXWolfGodXx

The link to his account, nsfw - might be taken down.

Screen shot of his bio.

View attachment 1639124

View attachment 1639129
Click to expand...
That's definitely a stolen image. I know the original guy behind that picture and he's not German or anything. ( https://www.furaffinity.net/user/hom.nom.nom ) A lot of people who are open about being into the real shit keep it on the down low and don't like to attach their real fursonas to it, until they really trust you.

So that's fucked, for one. Hopefully people realize it's not the same guy. Live insertion stuff is just as fucking disgusting as crush, god. I don't get how people can do things like smother animals, watching them helpelessly struggle and panic and not feel some sort of instinctual urge to just... Stop? So many of us have that weirdly parental instinct where small animals are seen as inherently innocent and shouldn't be harmed for fun. Disgusting fuckers. Telegram is rife with it, but it seems hard to find the hotspots of abuse when it's non-furry - So many of those groups are not English or really listed publicly and you need to know people to get in.
 
RotFly said:
Hello, first time posting on this site. I won't go into details, but i have an account on an non-mainstreem adult site. I have some videos on this site, nothing with me in it and nothing to werid, but some videos that attract some weirdos. Unfortuanly this person wanted to add me, i rejected them and told them that they are a subhuman - i don't like people who are into "crush" videos anyway - but then i noticed that they are saying that they have videos of bigger creatures being "crushed" on their telegram.

I don't know where else i could post this so i thought that you guys might want to take a look, i did report him to the site and said that i was going to (but looking into it, there is no way to) the police. I doubt the site will do anything since hes been up for a year with this crap on and they have had rats and stuff being crushed and eaten untill i reported them.

Then i remembered zoosadism and the whole outcome of that, i do not use telegram and do not have the guts to look up this guy on telegram but i thought that you guys might be intrested in at least getting his account shut down?

I cannot archive the site for some reason, the wayback mahcine does not work since i assume that its an adult site, but i have provided the link and some screen shots. I also have posted his profile photo, i am not sure if he created it or just stole it from somewhere. I am not sure if he also uses his telegram account name as a user name but some stuff has come up like a twitch channal. You need an account to see his profile bio on "ThisVids"

I am sorry if this is a bad quallity post, this is the first time i posted on this site.

His telegram account is called: @xXWolfGodXx

The link to his account, nsfw - might be taken down.

Screen shot of his bio.

View attachment 1639124

View attachment 1639129
Click to expand...
I knew it'd be ThisVid the moment I read your first paragraph.

Furries are becoming quite common on there, great way to find out who to avoid at the next convention.
 
His account is gone now, the admins (i assume) got rid of it. If he had any brains he wouldn't try and add me as a freind again but i'm sure he will be back, i haven't checked.

To give credit to the site, they have taken down this kind of content when i have reported it, but there is far to much of it (but its almost allways bugs and stuff). I think they claim to review every video but i have seen outright gore (It was a man getting his forskin/penis in some bondage thing) and other things that break the guide lines. They do have some bot or something that does check for copyrighted work and rejects it before uploading.

Do you guys know if its possble to get his telegram taken down or is it pointless?
 
Pukebucket said:
"Timothy Amoroso, 59
1001 Hilltop Rd, Winlock, WA 98596
Associates: Karen L Amoroso, Yvonne Jean Amoroso, George R Amoroso
Previous Addresses:Tracy, CA
Work: Add Info
School: Add Info
Summary: Timothy Amoroso's birthday is 05/06/1961 and is 59 years old. Previously city included Tracy CA. Timothy J Amorosoe, Timmothy G Amoroso, Tim Amoroso, Tim G Amorosa and Timmothy George Amoroso are some of the alias or nicknames that Timothy has used. We have lots of information about Timothy: religious views are listed as Christian, ethnicity is Caucasian, and political affiliation is currently a registered Democrat. As of this date, Timothy is married. Other family members and associates include Karen Amoroso, Yvonne Amoroso, George Amoroso, Joann Hepner and James Bolden. Timothy's annual salary is between $60 - 69,999; properties and other assets push Timothy's net worth over $100,000 - $249,999.
"
Archive that shit OP. It's very likey that that is him. Middle name is George, lives in Washington. It says he's married but whether the other names listed are spouses or if it's referring to his dog or not is hard to say. The doc from Archive the Wolf mentions that Tim's posts on reddit about wanting mental health assistance that he claims he has been actively harming animals for at least 40 years so this Timothy Amoroso being 59 lines up almost perfectly. Apparently both he and Karen Amoroso have had charges filed against them in the past although I'm not sure if I want to fuck around and download shit here to find out what it's in relation to.

Edit: A Serial Cat Killer is on the Loose in Washington - New York Times 2018
I've brought up these crimes privately before in discussion but I wonder. Olympia is about an hour and a half drive away from Hilltop, give or take. It's also a national forest and far more secluded than the suburbs around Maryville. I'm not sure if Tim is known to target cats (by the sounds of it he takes anything he can get) but I do find it entirely too suspect that someone with the same interests as Tim would be operating in the same state less than a two hour drive away without his knowledge.
Click to expand...
Akela confirms this dox is correct.
Screenshot (291)_LI.jpg
 
MexicanSpaceProgram said:
Looks like there is already a zoophilia board infesting the front page of 9chan.tw and zoosadism is already being discussed, I dont see any threads about zoosadism in particular but it is being argued about. https://9chan.tw/zoophilia/View attachment 1671516View attachment 1671517View attachment 1671514
Click to expand...
Just a glimpse through and I'm already digusted; here's a lot of images being freely shared of everything from dogs to deer, although I suspect most of them are collected from beastiality sites rather than original content.

Edit: And to the surprise of fucking nobody, some of them are already making their own comparisons between animal and kiddy porn.
 
No torturing animals, but raping them until they bleed is fine.
Screenshot_20201020-175729(1).jpg

OHNONONONONOO
Screenshot_20201020-180316.png

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!
Screenshot_20201020-175802(1).jpg

Pukebucket said:
Edit: And to the surprise of fucking nobody, some of them are already making their own comparisons between animal and kiddy porn.
Click to expand...
I wanted some context on that, found what you meant in the rabbit thread:
Screenshot_20201020-180946.png
 
Last edited:
MexicanSpaceProgram said:
No torturing animals, but raping them until they bleed is fine.
View attachment 1675869
Click to expand...
Pretty sure forcing or coercing sex onto an unwilling or uncommunicative participant in of itself is considered an act of rape, and that rape by broader definition is considered a form of physical abuse and/or torture under most legal jurisdictions already, nevermind when it escalates to the point of physical bleeding. But #NotAllZoos are sadists, amirite?

This ToS is especially horrifying all on it's own. It makes it very clear that, while zoophiles like to claim their actions are consensual in order to sway public perception that they are not malignant abusers, in private they know full well that what they're doing constitutes as rape and just don't care unless it leaves visible scars that other people might notice and call them out for. There are zoos all over Twitter claiming that their animals can totally consent and tell them to stop if they "really didn't want it", but they sure show their true colors the second they're provided with a little anonymity.

The subtext in this ToS makes it very clear that zoophiles only consider the health and wellbeing of their animals insofar as they are able to continue to fuck them. They like claiming that their pets get the best food, affection, and vet care possible, but at the end of the day it's all so that they can have a living fuckdoll at their disposal without it expiring sooner due to negligence. After all, even Realdolls and fleshlights need maintenance to stay useable.
 
I'm much more interested in actually getting the likes of Tim etc. caught, so the anon aspect is sad and daunting, but, given we are dealing with someone who can effectively disappear after each post- What would you guys recommend for screencapping or archiving content?

I am of the opinion that it should be censored where possible/not posting the offending porn, but, what exactly are we looking to gain from 9chan? Is it all to gawk at while moving along at a break-neck speed (aka only archive the truly exceptional) or are we trying to find familiar faces? ID fursuits? Genuinely asking as I would like to make a difference here, if possible. :optimistic:
 
Umaru Doma said:
I'm much more interested in actually getting the likes of Tim etc. caught, so the anon aspect is sad and daunting, but, given we are dealing with someone who can effectively disappear after each post- What would you guys recommend for screencapping or archiving content?

I am of the opinion that it should be censored where possible/not posting the offending porn, but, what exactly are we looking to gain from 9chan? Is it all to gawk at while moving along at a break-neck speed (aka only archive the truly exceptional) or are we trying to find familiar faces? ID fursuits? Genuinely asking as I would like to make a difference here, if possible. :optimistic:
Click to expand...
I had a similar argument quite awhile ago back when everyone was searching for Woof, I was used to chan style architecture where things blur into nothing minutes after they are done being talked about, but since then I have changed my viewpoints after becoming more familiar with this website. Anything and everything about zoosadists is to be discussed and documented in this thread. If you would like to discuss and document whoever you would like feel free, its not going anywhere. As for 9chan I just ran into it after finding a link to the site and though it would be worth bringing up, personally id like to see any zoophilia be expunged, but mainly I just posted it to be as you said 'gawked at', not taking away anything you might want to discuss.
 
Umaru Doma said:
I'm much more interested in actually getting the likes of Tim etc. caught, so the anon aspect is sad and daunting, but, given we are dealing with someone who can effectively disappear after each post- What would you guys recommend for screencapping or archiving content?

I am of the opinion that it should be censored where possible/not posting the offending porn, but, what exactly are we looking to gain from 9chan? Is it all to gawk at while moving along at a break-neck speed (aka only archive the truly exceptional) or are we trying to find familiar faces? ID fursuits? Genuinely asking as I would like to make a difference here, if possible. :optimistic:
Click to expand...
There are likely going to be no "new" posts on this board, just your run-of-the-mill zoo/zoosadist porn. Although on the off-chance someone is stupid enough to post OC, it's worth keeping an eye on.
 
Last edited:
Legoshi said:
View attachment 1676997
Poor dogs...😢


Seeing that photo of the fox held by the neck was horrifying.... They're such beautiful and gentle creatures. It paints me to see it like that. I wonder what happened to it.

That bulldog's back is probably ruined...

Sorry about the post I made earlier.
View attachment 1677097View attachment 1677098View attachment 1677099
Click to expand...
Put this filth under a spoiler, jesus christ.
 
I remember there was some channel on Youtube that did some of this fucked up shit but I don't recall the name.

I found this blogpost with this Filipino zoosadist named Jerzon Senador from 2011. Unfortunately his FB was taken down. There's also a Daily Mail article about him.
DOG1.jpg
DOG2.jpg
DOG3.jpg
DOG.jpg
DOG4.jpg
Like this shit
horrid.JPG
horrid 2.JPG
I apologize for my first post on this megathread!
 
Last edited:
Legoshi said:
I remember there was some channel on Youtube that did some of this fucked up shit but I don't recall the name.

I found this blogpost with this Filipino zoosadist named Jerzon Senador from 2011. Unfortunately his FB was taken down. There's also a Daily Mail article about him.
View attachment 1677138
View attachment 1677140
View attachment 1677141
View attachment 1677142
View attachment 1677143
Like this shit
View attachment 1677128
View attachment 1677129
I apologize for my first post on this megathread!
Click to expand...
First guy I've never even heard of but he's pretty much your bargain bin influencer; using animals as props for clout.

Animal crush is also very old hat and has been discussed here at length. As of last/earlier this year (I don't care enough to check) they have been listed as a federal crime now along with other animal torture/snuff-style videos and good ol' CP, so actual sites can be reported to the FBI and are probably not going to be found on the surface web anymore without heavy encryption and/or secret channels to protect member anonymity. This is why even 9chan is asking people not to share crush or sadism videos despite, you know, anal rape to the point of bleeding being acceptable according to them.

If prolapsed, bleeding dog asses is the kind of content they are allowing then I can't imagine they'll stay open for very long, legal technicalities and personal interpretations of the law be damned. I'm sure they'll try to defend it in court as just "roughplay", but any judge, jury, or even passing stranger on the street will probably argue that dogs can't offer verbal, informed consent to sex with humans in the first place, let alone the specifics of what kind of sex they want, and that even in a legal circuit there are few allowances for "well I asked and they didn't say no, so therefore they said yes".

To repeatedly retread the same ground for the billionth time; you cannot get a definitive "yes" from a dog, even if it's humping your fucking leg, and most rape advocates will attest that just because someone has a physical reaction to being assaulted or molested (whether they be dog or minor or grown-ass adult) it does not mean they personally consent for the sexual activity to continue. There are many people who have adverse and unwanted physical reactions to rape or sexual assault; it does not mean that they "wanted it" just because they were wet/hard, and I feel this is especially true for an animal, whose judgment may be impaired by extreme hormonal spikes such as estrus. Just because they are capable of reproducing with their own species does not mean they are capable or competent enough to differentiate between their own kind and a human, and that lack of intellectual capacity and understanding is a detriment to their ability to consent, not a prerogative.
 
Pukebucket said:
First guy I've never even heard of but he's pretty much your bargain bin influencer; using animals as props for clout.

Animal crush is also very old hat and has been discussed here at length. As of last/earlier this year (I don't care enough to check) they have been listed as a federal crime now along with other animal torture/snuff-style videos and good ol' CP, so actual sites can be reported to the FBI and are probably not going to be found on the surface web anymore without heavy encryption and/or secret channels to protect member anonymity. This is why even 9chan is asking people not to share crush or sadism videos despite, you know, anal rape to the point of bleeding being acceptable according to them.

If prolapsed, bleeding dog asses is the kind of content they are allowing then I can't imagine they'll stay open for very long, legal technicalities and personal interpretations of the law be damned. I'm sure they'll try to defend it in court as just "roughplay", but any judge, jury, or even passing stranger on the street will probably argue that dogs can't offer verbal, informed consent to sex with humans in the first place, let alone the specifics of what kind of sex they want, and that even in a legal circuit there are few allowances for "well I asked and they didn't say no, so therefore they said yes".

To repeatedly retread the same ground for the billionth time; you cannot get a definitive "yes" from a dog, even if it's humping your fucking leg, and most rape advocates will attest that just because someone has a physical reaction to being assaulted or molested (whether they be dog or minor or grown-ass adult) it does not mean they personally consent for the sexual activity to continue. There are many people who have adverse and unwanted physical reactions to rape or sexual assault; it does not mean that they "wanted it" just because they were wet/hard, and I feel this is especially true for an animal, whose judgment may be impaired by extreme hormonal spikes such as estrus. Just because they are capable of reproducing with their own species does not mean they are capable or competent enough to differentiate between their own kind and a human, and that lack of intellectual capacity and understanding is a detriment to their ability to consent, not a prerogative.
Click to expand...
Don't dogs (depending on the breed, Border Collies are the smartest) have the intelligence spans of 2-4 year olds? That means that they aren't able to comprehend these things.

I think death penalty and an execution for kid-fiddling nonces and animal-raping zoosadists would be the best punishments.
 
Legoshi said:
View attachment 1676997
Poor dogs...😢



Seeing that photo of the fox held by the neck was horrifying.... They're such beautiful and gentle creatures. It paints me to see it like that. I wonder what happened to it.

That bulldog's back is probably ruined...

View attachment 1677097View attachment 1677098View attachment 1677099

View attachment 1677096View attachment 1677095

View attachment 1676996
Click to expand...
What in the fuck is an auto-zoosadist?
 
Legoshi said:
View attachment 1676997
Poor dogs...😢



Seeing that photo of the fox held by the neck was horrifying.... They're such beautiful and gentle creatures. It paints me to see it like that. I wonder what happened to it.

That bulldog's back is probably ruined...

View attachment 1677097View attachment 1677098View attachment 1677099

View attachment 1677096View attachment 1677095

View attachment 1676996
Click to expand...
I read about the Bulldog one awhile ago. It was two teenage brothers and they had saved that video of them stepping on and throwing the bulldog down a flight of stairs and put it on an SD card that got lost at a store. Someone found it, watched the video and reported it to the authorities. The dog eventually had to be put down from injuries, Baby I think it's name was It was either their mom's dog or a relative's I don't remember but it happened in New York I think. The entire neighborhood demanded justice and I think someone payed for a blimp that read 'Justice for Baby' or something like that. Latest news was that one of the brothers cried for police protection due to people coming after him.

Pukebucket said:
If prolapsed, bleeding dog asses is the kind of content they are allowing then I can't imagine they'll stay open for very long, legal technicalities and personal interpretations of the law be damned. I'm sure they'll try to defend it in court as just "roughplay", but any judge, jury, or even passing stranger on the street will probably argue that dogs can't offer verbal, informed consent to sex with humans in the first place, let alone the specifics of what kind of sex they want, and that even in a legal circuit there are few allowances for "well I asked and they didn't say no, so therefore they said yes".

To repeatedly retread the same ground for the billionth time; you cannot get a definitive "yes" from a dog, even if it's humping your fucking leg, and most rape advocates will attest that just because someone has a physical reaction to being assaulted or molested (whether they be dog or minor or grown-ass adult) it does not mean they personally consent for the sexual activity to continue. There are many people who have adverse and unwanted physical reactions to rape or sexual assault; it does not mean that they "wanted it" just because they were wet/hard, and I feel this is especially true for an animal, whose judgment may be impaired by extreme hormonal spikes such as estrus. Just because they are capable of reproducing with their own species does not mean they are capable or competent enough to differentiate between their own kind and a human, and that lack of intellectual capacity and understanding is a detriment to their ability to consent, not a prerogative.
Click to expand...

I should've added those were just board rules made by the board creator, not representative of the entire site. I doubt if someone complained anything would be done, however.


EDIT: The bulldog incident happened in Redcar, England and Baby was a family pet. It got worldwide notice with lots of anti-cruelty activists and one of the many protests must have happened in NYC which is why I remembered it as that at first. Also it was a plane with a banner over a football stadium, not a blimp. And finally, a vigilante actually attacked one of the brothers leading him to call police.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom