contains numerous baseless claims buried within over 40 pages of analysis and citations, and which appears to have been carefully crafted to mask the dubious nature of the letter’s origin and the unfounded nature of many of the author’s allegations
They fail to state what those claims actually are, because they cannot actually refute them.
The COVID pandemic is part of a global conspiracy perpetrated by an international cabal of “Elites” engaged in coordinating a biological attack for the purpose of controlling humanity through “nonsensical acts of healthcare theater.”
This doesn't even have a refutation, but it's obvious to anyone with two functioning eyes, two ears, and a brain between them.
The COVID vaccines contain previously undisclosed, "mysterious" nanoparticles (debunked
here).
Vaccine manufacturers can put any undisclosed ingredients they like in their vaccines, and guard the information behind NDAs as "trade secrets". Just because something isn't disclosed, that doesn't mean it's not in there.
Independent researchers are finding unexpected contaminants in these vaccines. Researchers in Spain claim to have found graphene when they put the vaccine under SEM or TEM microscopy.
Vaccines have made the SARS-CoV2 virus more deadly (previously debunked
here, and
here).
Luc Montagnier, recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine claimed that new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination.
www.newswise.com
This was posted in May. The information is old.
If a vaccine stops being effective, or the antibodies produced by it become non-neutralizing and induce ADE, it is because of antigenic drift in the endemic strains of the virus. That is, mutational escape. It takes time and numerous mutations for that to emerge.
They cannot explain why Israel, which is highly vaccinated, has so many cases, nor can they explain all the breakthrough cases, nor the fact that even the CDC acknowledges that the vaccinated can spread the virus.
This letter is being rated as Mostly False, and serves as a useful example of the rhetorical tactic known as the
Gish Gallop. By overwhelming the reader with so much information, some of it true or with at least an air of superficial credibility in this case through the use of knowledgeable-sounding medical jargon, perpetrators of the Gish Gallop make it virtually impossible to rebut their arguments point by point.
You're just too lazy, bitch.
As for the claim that a global conspiracy is behind the pandemic, such claims are impossible to adequately refute due to the very secrecy such a conspiracy would require; anyone asserting that the conspiracy does not exist is either 1) in on the plot, or 2) simply uninformed. The notion that so many thousands of scientists, public officials, healthcare workers, etc., could conspire to such ends without risking exposure of evidence of the conspiracy does not stand up to rational scrutiny. Nonetheless, such claims are common among peddlers of COVID misinformation, particularly popular among adherents to the infamous QAnon conspiracy and online message boards, because of the power of the
Appeal to Ignorance fallacy. The very lack of evidence
against the conspiracy is proof that the conspiracy exists. The letter itself alludes to this phenomenon, stating, “The majority of the public are scientifically illiterate and cannot grasp what any of this even means, thanks to a pathetic educational system that has miseducated them. You would be lucky to find 1 in 100 people who have even the faintest clue what any of this actually means.”
It's not even secret. It's been blown wide open.
U.S.-funded experiment in China posed biosafety risks but did not cause Covid-19 pandemic, scientists say.
theintercept.com
Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance repurposed grants to Wuhan Insistitue of Virology for the Gain-of-Threat experiments on bat viruses causing Covid-19 Pandemic.
peterdaszak.com
Bafflingly, the author seems to want to have it both ways; COVID-19 is simultaneously worse than reported (airborne droplets cannot be stopped by surgical masks, social distancing should be fifteen feet, not six), and not as bad as reported (mortality rates are much lower than we think because of so many unreported, asymptomatic cases). Our analysis finds these competing assertions to be further evidence of the author’s lack of credibility, and readers are urged to view such anonymous claims with a high degree of skepticism.
Here, they confuse infectiousness and virulence. These positions are not contradictory. It is entirely possible for a virus to be more infectious and
also less lethal than claimed.
1) "Vaccines will do more harm than good. The antigen that these vaccines are based on, SARS-CoV- 2 Spike, is a toxic protein. SARS-CoV-2 may have ADE, or antibody-dependent enhancement"
See:
https://www.newswise.com/factcheck/...ement-is-not-yet-supported/?article_id=742569
Just because it hasn't happened yet, that doesn't mean it won't happen in the future. In fact, all signs point to SARS-like viruses having ADE like Dengue. That's a big fucking deal. I pointed that shit out back in February 2020 before people even knew what the hell we were dealing with.
Sanofi's Dengvaxia failed due to vaccine-enhanced disease. We have evidence in the recent past of this shit happening. There's a reason why you don't do accelerated clinical trials of a vaccine that uses an entirely new method of vaccination on an entirely new disease, shit-for-brains.
ijvtpr.com
2) "There is a vast and appalling criminal conspiracy that directly links both Anthony Fauci and Moderna to the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
See:
https://www.newswise.com/articles/d...idence-that-the-coronavirus-was-made-in-a-lab
That link doesn't even contain a refutation. They just say the scientific case for the claim is "weak" without qualifying that at all.
They completely ignore the massive paper trail of grants, projects, papers, and scientific collaboration that
explicitly links the NIH, DARPA, DTRA, and USAID to the WIV.
3) "Various non-vaccine interventions have been suppressed by both the media and the medical establishment in favor of vaccines and expensive patented drugs."
See:
https://www.newswise.com/articles/t...ite-claims-that-it-works-or-that-it-s-useless
"Duurrrrr! Clinical trials show no workie!"
Clinical trials where they futilely give antivirals to people who have sepsis and no virus left in their bodies.
4) "Surgical masks do not protect you from aerosols. The virus is too small and the filter media has too large of gaps to filter it out."
See:
https://www.newswise.com/articles/c...-effective-at-reducing-the-spread-of-covid-19
I am fit-tested and qualified to wear firefighting SCBA gear and P100 respirators as part of my fucking job. Surgical masks do not block aerosols. It's no better than wearing a T-shirt over your face. It goes right through.
The best defense against COVID-19 is to quite literally put 15+ feet between yourself and any crowds and avoid coughing people. Mask or not, you will never catch it.
One of the letter’s most outrageous, and at times, incoherent claims hinges on the idea that the vaccines are being used to infect people with mysterious, undisclosed nanoparticles consisting of graphene and other substances in an effort to prep the populace for some as-of-yet-unexplained neurological experimentation and even, in theory, mind control. The author writes:
The author goes on to implicate the BRAIN Initiative (Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies), an Obama-era program to research brain-computer interfaces with applications such as allowing amputees to better control prosthetics through technology. They speculate that such a technology could be used to subdue a population via “read-write capability over neurons, either by stimulating and probing them, or by rendering them especially sensitive to stimulation and probing.”
The end game of such a program? “Spartacus” makes the logical leap to tyranny.
Not science fiction. Real technology. Real potential for fucking tyranny.
While no one can predict with certainty where such technologies as funded by the BRAIN Initiative may eventually lead, it’s hard to view this particular leap as anything other than the stuff of science fiction. Further, the author’s down-the-rabbit-hole speculation leads us to a world where, “Someone who is involuntarily celibate could have their libido disabled so they don’t even desire sex to begin with. Someone who is racist could be forced to feel delight over cohabiting with people of other races. Someone who is violent could be forced to be meek and submissive. These things might sound good to you if you are a tyrant, but to normal people, the idea of personal autonomy being overridden to such a degree is appalling.”
The invocation of Involuntary Celibacy, a pet issue of QAnon conspiracy theorists, is a giant red flag, as well as the spectre (presumably undesirable, to the author) of race mixing, and a population subdued, unable to resort to violence to resist. Whether the author references these hot-button topics as a subtextual signal to online communities of InCels, White Supremacists, and violent extremism, or whether they truly believe this is a potential outcome, is unknown. However, the inclusion of these dog-whistles further degrades the credibility of the author and their arguments.
This is a developing story and further details and expert commentary will be added and updated as they become available.
The letter is not partisan and does not endorse being a "violent, racist, white supremacist incel" or whatever the fuck this peabrain is claiming. Citing examples of using mind control to force antisocial people to behave more in-line with what globalists desire would necessarily involve descriptions of the exact kind of people that deboonker retards and establishment goons demonize as "deplorables". If the shoe was on the other foot, and the establishment was cracking down on BLM, anarchists, communists, et cetera, then the examples would be based on caricatures of the left.
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com
