He still doesn't understand what "bad faith" means. Again, magic words he doesn't truly grasp the meaning of, being tossed around like projectiles, hoping something will stick.It's so beautiful that he still doesn't know what bad faith means even though an actual judge has explained it it to him in person before. You can't just apologize if the judge perceived your shit to be bad faith and then said you totes didn't mean it that way.
Cocktease. But I
you anyway. I get it, sources to protect and all. I've seen a lot of cows do this. Chantal and ALR are big on this too, actually. "It's not constructive criticism!" No one says people have to like you or treat you with kid gloves, or be gentle about breaking it to you that you're a disgusting hog who's eating herself to death. That doesn't mean it's invalid criticism, or that it violates YouTube's TOS or whatever. I can't imagine being so coddled and weak that you think anyone saying something in a tone you don't like -- even if it's entirely true and factual and not even that judgmental -- is grounds to dismiss them and comfort you. Russ kinda next-levels it when he says that Kiwi Farms is attacking other people as well, so he, Russ, must win his case and be comforted.
As far as I am aware, no. The suit is currently dismissed with prejudice. There's no suit to respond to.
So is this even an appeal? Or is he just using a lot of words (incorrectly) to tell the judge she doesn't know how to do her job?
She misinterpreted the court's own opinion. Just let him EXPLAIN.
Not the first time he overstates value of his shitty content.
Null \ Hardin still respond to Melinda's bullshit even after it was dismissed with prejudice.
It’s absolutely not a real appeal. He’s trying to EXPLAIN to the original judge why she should change her ruling voluntarily. A real appeal is filed in the court of appeals and it’s purpose is to overturn a judges decision.
It's short of an appeal. It's meant to be for if the judge obviously fucked up and you're just pointing it out in the hopes that she will say "ah, fuck, I copy pasted the wrong thing there" and fix it. It's futile here as Russ is trying to re-litigate his case without actually filing an appeal.
I wonder if this is cheaper than filing an appeal? That might be why he's doing it in addition to thinking the judge is an idiot.
Isn't he filing in forma pauperis?
It's just more of his "The judge decided wrongly" self-soothing bullshit.
It's probably quicker and easier. I don't know if IFP status is automatically granted for an appeal in the 10th circuit if it was granted for the initial case.
It's in addition to filing an appeal. He's taking every shot he's got in the hopes that maybe he'll score.
Everyone who said Russ will seize on "the court sympathizes with Greer's plight" to try and reopen the case, please collect your winnings!
It's a motion. Skordas needs to file an opposition in 14 days. It's a bullshit motion, so it's unlikely that the judge would grant the relief even if Null didn't file a reply, but it's better to file and ask for fees. Russ' Rule 59 motion is so poorly written that it deserves Rule 11 sanctions. None of the statements he points to in his complaint would be considered "inducement" by any court, which is why the court correctly dismissed his complaint with prejudice.
You admitted that my life is hard and I'm a sad little victim. I'm going to set aside my disability for a moment and focus all my manipulative skill on trying to convince you that my plights are purely because of Kiwi Farms, even though that's not really what you said. I'll just pretend it is what you said, though, because that serves my purpose and it's not like you'll correct me. If you try, I'll just ignore it.
It's not fair. I suffered! And the public suffered! I've never really explained how the public suffered, but they did! That makes it a matter of public importance! I keep going on and on about my suffering though, because that's what's really important here. Just imagine my pain being transposed onto the public and you'll understand.
My life is over if you don't give me what I want. I will hold my breath until I pass out! And they deserve to be punished. I know you already said you disagreed with me on this, but you weren't serious. I'm sure that if I just keep insisting on it being true, and demanding that I get another chance to explain, that eventually you'll give in. Mom always did.
They hurt me really badly by being mean to me and saying my music sucked, and I worked really hard to overcome that. Can't you see how hard I'm trying here? I'm a hero for getting over my pain enough to pursue this court case. I'm brave! I'm strong! No one else could have overcome this. I'm special! How can you not reward my efforts? I suffered more than anyone else in the world and yet I overcame that suffering to seek revenge. How can you deny me that revenge? It's not just morally wrong, it's legally wrong. You're making legal mistakes here by not giving me what I want. I'm sure that just by invoking that, you'll be intimidated into agreeing with me. It's like asking to speak to someone's manager when they won't give you a free refill on your coffee even though you're a customer and and awesome guy.