- Joined
- Jan 16, 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My understanding is that they're supposed to flag anyone who has been involuntarily committed. I also understand that this doesn't always happen. Is that correct?I work in psychiatric care, dude.
There's no magical list of people who have been hospitalized, no list of people who have been diagnosed bipolar. Half the time doctors don't even share information among themselves, which is why it's so easy to doctor shop and collect medication like Pokémon.
Wishful thinking but trust me, you'd be hearing a whole lot of protesting about human rights violations if everyone who got psych care got stuck on a list
Ideally, but not anymore on the law-enforcement side; and they're certainly not going inform lowly psych counselors of the fact.This is not how any of this works.
It depends on the state/municipality, and if the person is a .gov employee or veteran (then it's guaranteed); but the law(s) have existed on the federal level since 2007; the fed left it up to the states to draw up their reporting methods, but the standard has existed since then. The one constant is that a psych hold (voluntary or otherwise) is supposed to be reported to NICS.My understanding is that they're supposed to flag anyone who has been involuntarily committed. I also understand that this doesn't always happen. Is that correct?
They say if you give chimpanzees infinite time they’ll eventually bang out Shakespeare unknowingly on a type writer.Interesting that she posted an hour ago about it being her one year anniversary on T, since that's been a debate here in the last few pages.
Maybe she really is reading
Second Amendment rights are fundamental and can't be arbitrarily taken away without due process. Nor are psychiatric records available to any random snoop. From the ATF:My understanding is that they're supposed to flag anyone who has been involuntarily committed. I also understand that this doesn't always happen. Is that correct?
Gotta E-beg on her trooniversary:
View attachment 2583401
https://twitter.com/KindKinkster/status/1443586603142713353 (Archive)
Now the job was “transphobic?” I thought they didn’t know about her being trans and the reason she quit was because of “abuse?”Gotta E-beg on her trooniversary:
View attachment 2583401
https://twitter.com/KindKinkster/status/1443586603142713353 (Archive)
That's as dumb as saying you lost your virginity to a tampon
Everything is phobic. But phobia is a fear...Now the job was “transphobic?” I thought they didn’t know about her being trans and the reason she quit was because of “abuse?”
A hold under something like the Baker Act or California's 5150 should not be in NICS since it is not an adjudication and federal law does not prohibit firearms ownership by such people. NICS purportedly only consists of information which would lead to a federal prohibition on firearms ownership.Involuntary holds usually make their way into the NICS system- but in a lot of places you can just buy privately from an individual selling a single firearm to avoid the background check.
It genuinely wouldn't surprise me that before quitting the worst thing they noticed was that she was glued to her phone a lot, but that's not unusual with 20-somethings today. The reason why she's acting so crazy on twitter - and presumably now in real life - is because it gives her attention and validation. They're basically feeding the BPD attention monster which is the worst thing you can do... well except if you want to produce milk for us New Zealand based farmers that is.I've been of the mind she kind of hid her crazy at work because she was in love with the husband, something I think if he was aware of but he ignored.
Should've given him the nickname motherfucker.In elementary school I knew a dude who was convinced that no men are virgins because when you are born you are "in your mothers vagina" and are therefore not a virgin.
I told him being a virgin means you've never had sexual intercourse and that the process of being born is not the same thing as having sexual intercourse. He got all hangdog and depressed after that and I felt bad for bursting his bubble.
It shouldn't, but it does.NICS purportedly only consists of information which would lead to a federal prohibition on firearms ownership.
A lot of states have a catch-all that allows the licensing agency in charge of such things to refuse to issue depending on fairly vague criteria, but even those states have some administrative appeals process, and generally quasi-judicial decisions like this by an agency can be challenged in an actual court.The wording is deliberately vague when it comes to who can do the adjudication; "lawful authority" can even be a state social worker, not just a court.