US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I didn't see anyone else really touch on this, but I really wish more right leaning people would be more vocal to speak with their wallet. For instance, when Coke went on their whole "yt ppl bad lmao" shit my partner and I said we would never give them another penny. And we have stuck to our guns and have encouraged our family to do the same.

Dems are always SUPER LOUD when it comes to trying to cancel a company for wrong think™️. I just wish we would collectively hit them in the wallet more too.
One thing I have gotten more comfortable with is just saying I don't want to buy something from a company because of their actions. It doesn't have to be consistent. It doesn't have to be life or death. It can just be this company shoves crt down their employees throats or puts it in their ads and so I'm not going to buy from them anymore.

Does anyone think leftists have perfect consistency with who they boycott? Does anyone think they even try to care about consistency? No. Just fuck that company and buy from someone else. Don't chose to never fight a battle just because fighting every battle is impossible.
 
Capture.PNG

Legal warfare is great stuff
 
If I'm reading this right, America First Legal is alleging that the Biden administration planted the idea of the National School Board Association sending a letter to the DOJ to justify cracking down on anti-CRT protests. The AFL has now asked for a congressional investigation into collusion between Garland and the NSBA.

Untitled-1 - Copy (68).jpgFBN5CuzVQAQUIxW.jpgFBN5DPbVQAIhtUX.jpgFBN5DPbVQAIhtUX.jpg
Link | Archive

"... Biden Administration officials developed a plan to use a letter from an outside group ("not the usual suspects") as pretext for federal action ..."

That letter seems to suggest that they have insider information (Jane Doe #1, etc.) about meetings that went on.

It's true that the process of the DOJ response was extremely accelerated and also that the NSBA did not contact any of its members in drafting the letter. I looked into whether other school boards were supporting the letter, and it turns out that the Virginia School Board Association had no inkling that the letter was being sent and said they do not support involving the feds. They are members of the NSBA, and Virginia school board meetings were cited as being the justification for FBI involvement in the NSBA's letter, so that's a pretty big defection.

VSBA Statement on NSBA Letter to President Biden
Link | Archive
"While the Virginia School Boards Association (VSBA) is currently a member of NSBA, it was not consulted about this letter, did not provide information to NSBA, and was not informed that the letter was being sent. The decision by NSBA to write this letter is not the first disagreement that VSBA has had with its national association and probably will not be the last, but it is important that our members and the citizens of this state know where VSBA stands."

The Biden admin is also trying to use different words other than "equity" to try to hide those docs from FOIAs.

Not ... uh ... good.
 
If I'm reading this right, America First Legal is alleging that the Biden administration planted the idea of the National School Board Association sending a letter to the DOJ to justify cracking down on anti-CRT protests. The AFL has now asked for a congressional investigation into collusion between Garland and the NSBA.

View attachment 2609586View attachment 2609590View attachment 2609595View attachment 2609598
Link | Archive



That letter seems to suggest that they have insider information (Jane Doe #1, etc.) about meetings that went on.

It's true that the process of the DOJ response was extremely accelerated and also that the NSBA did not contact any of its members in drafting the letter. I looked into whether other school boards were supporting the letter, and it turns out that the Virginia School Board Association had no inkling that the letter was being sent and said they do not support involving the feds. They are members of the NSBA, and Virginia school board meetings were cited as being the justification for FBI involvement in the NSBA's letter, so that's a pretty big defection.

VSBA Statement on NSBA Letter to President Biden
Link | Archive


The Biden admin is also trying to use different words other than "equity" to try to hide those docs from FOIAs.

Not ... uh ... good.
All in all...


...it's just another brick in the wall.
 
Lol, get fucked Rick. No one outside of hardcore partisans or inside the beltway ruling class simps (ie yourself) give a shit about the "unprecedented attack on Our Democracy ™️ "
More importantly, it means that the Political Capital Credit Card just bounced. The Biden Admin and the DNC no longer have enough political capital to run the kangaroo court. That seems huge to me.

Wonder when the political prisoners they're currently torturing will be released?
 
I just told a friend of mine, heavily into crypto that he should get out. After China banned it, it's only aatter of time before the rest of the goverments do.

The response was "Nope. They wouldn't do that. Too much trouble/money involved to do that".

Biggest problem with business people's world views tend to be they think it's about the money. It's not about the money. It's about control and power. Money is a means to an end and we have seen for the past decade with all the social media companies they have no problem throwing money away if it means they control what people see and think.

Hopefully people will figure it out, but judging by this forum, it'll be way to late.
The problem with this speculation is that two Democrats & fifty Republicans refuse to raise the budget. How are they going to get more money for this Crypto force? What would this Crypto force even do? Are they fully criminalizing Crypto or just preventing transactions for illegal activities? Are they criminalizing some Crypto but not all of it?
 
Day 262 of missing this nigga like you wouldn't believe.

View attachment 2609654
The minorities who voted consistently for the Democrats in 2016 and 2020, like white people to have that higher out group bias since they are used to it so much as this point thanks to the woke white cult.

Part of the reason many were triggered hard by Trump was because the idea of white in group bias is bad for business for a lot of people.

>AIDS
So are they going to deny that a large proportion of Hatians have AIDS? Are they going to weakly acknowledge it and then say it's racist to make any judgement based on that?
The liberal is obsessed with tolerance to an extreme degree these days. Tucker mentioned how Trudeau before becoming Prime Minister, condemned the sitting Prime Minister of the time for bringing up honor killings in the Muslim world.

There is also pandering for votes from very tribalistic first generation minorities who never assimilated thanks to liberals giving up on assimilation for votes.
 
To be fair, I also think a lot of actual white male voters preferred Trump to Hillary.
Biden gaining with that group is one of those reasons I believe in election fraud. Trump was gaining in every single category we polled on, even that one. And yet, I am expected to believe that when it came to actual turnout our polling was spot on the money on every single one, except this one group we were -wildly- wrong on?

I remember reading a zerohedge article all the way back in like... May, I think? predicting that the 1/6 Commission would operate for a few months, decide nothing could be done and then the whole Commission would just be memoryholed. If this is true and Rick Wilson isn't being a faggot, +1 to zerohedge. Suck on that doompill Twitterati.
View attachment 2609137
View attachment 2609140View attachment 2609143
Rick Wilson is a political strategist and often works with the media, specifically CNN. The Biden Admin is using CNN for political strategy. The Biden Admin would be kept abreast of what Congress is doing because it affects them.

Hey, if anyone wanted some outside proof that CNN is in fact being used for political consultation...

This can be taken both ways. One: He's done kicking the can.

Two? To quote Mr. Baseball: "It's gonna cost ya, chief."

I think they're flat out taunting them with it. He knows this is costing political capital and goodwill they don't have. And they're gonna have to pay even more next time.
Your Two is exactly correct. Put simply actually stopping the debt ceiling issue right now would be a non-starter, and would hurt them in the midterms. I... don't think it would hurt them more than the Democrats have hurt themselves. But why take the risk when there is little to gain from it politically? But this can-kicking... now that can gain. For one, it lowers people's patience with the issue, making it more likely to -not- hurt them if they outright stop it later on. Second, every single time they do it Democrats have to make more concessions they simply cannot afford. The Admin burned through all of its Political Capital, now McConnell is forcing congress to burn through its reserves.

Nice fantasy.
What you’ll actually get is a “we must be bipartisan” Senate, which we’re already seeing now, and a tough primary in 2024 that will likely see Trump running third party.
I normally like, if not agree, with your stuff. But this is so off-base I have to ask, are you trolling? Trump runs as a third party? He has over 80% approval in the Republican party, if he runs he just -gets- the nomination, nobody could even hope to compete against him. This, along with the other half of your post, seems to be either a deliberate troll or you attempting to force your preconception into a situation where it simply does not fit.

its getting spicy in the senate chamber

View attachment 2609522
View attachment 2609523
Ignore what was said, focus on who said it. Romney, the Arch-RINO, came out and spoke against Schumer. Yes, it was tepid as fuck, but ignore -what- was said.

The Arch-RINO, head of the RINO faction, spoke against the Democrat Majority Leader.

Importance: This signals an end of RINO participation in any deal with said Majority Leader, the Infrastructure bill just lost all RINO support. Now, Schumer could get this support back through backroom deals... but they'd need to use current Political Capital, not yet-to-be-earned Political Capital. Capital... he simply doesn't have. Something Manchin knows.

The Appeals Court is the second highest US court right? What's the significance of them slapping this down so quickly? I thought these things usually take weeks.
Either a slow day (most likely) or word came from SCOTUS they want it on their desk ASAP.
 
The problem with this speculation is that two Democrats & fifty Republicans refuse to raise the budget. How are they going to get more money for this Crypto force? What would this Crypto force even do? Are they fully criminalizing Crypto or just preventing transactions for illegal activities? Are they criminalizing some Crypto but not all of it?
The issue is not just the government itself, I've heard rumors [preface; I'm not the most knowledgeable on this subject and my information is second hand or might be distorted from what was originally said take worth a grain of salt] :

That most banks want to regulate the value of all crypt currency. So in essence from what I understand, banks would then somehow be able to make the money less valuable than it was and somehow push it into a system. If I'm not mistaken it's kind of like this analogy:

Let's say you have someone you use a phsyical currency of bottle caps. A small system that has some formulated value (1 bottle cap = $800.00) now the bottle caps are hard to track and the government has no clue how much value people have so the banks might step in and force regulate the bottle caps and then reduce the value the caps have therein. Sure in this comparison it's a physical currency and not digital, but the same concept applies. The only issue is how they will track it or restrict it, removign it from general sellers is easy, but what about off the grid people, well this would be when the journalist and more start pushing for China's regulatory system or internet ID, if they use propoganda they might be able to pull it off, I mean look at the whole Covid fear mongering.

So they pull a few false flags and [insert other ops here] and fear monger terrorist and criminals are using them to undermine "our democracy" or whatever and boom. You could force the hand of the full government to try to force regulate and spy on people who have any crypto at all in essence. Then they can devalue the crypto because that was always their goal to force it into the standard system and have control of the value it has and screw the plebs who invested, and walk away with a psycho bitch laugh.

I'm sure they want to criminalize it but as mentioned in the analogy it would be near impossible to crack down on a made up currency in a system between unregulated purchasers and users, let alone digital. They could criminalize open market use but unless they go full Patriot Act 4.0 and start going overboard it's doubtful they could fully regulate it, unless they do the banking concept. How that works I'm not sure but in theory it makes sense knowing how these bastards operate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back