US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
An interesting op-ed.


A call for sanity this late in the game? You're too late, should've started talking about this when Trump was being impeached over and over.
 
The problem with this speculation is that two Democrats & fifty Republicans refuse to raise the budget. How are they going to get more money for this Crypto force? What would this Crypto force even do? Are they fully criminalizing Crypto or just preventing transactions for illegal activities? Are they criminalizing some Crypto but not all of it?
Don't need congress for an EO. China simply made all Crypto exchanges illegal. I imagine it wouldn't be too difficult to wrote up an EO declaring all Crypto exchanges to be illegal, which I know wouldn't make it so, but the normies don't know that. And in the mean time it gives the DOJ the order to start looking at how to make it illegal and treat it as such.

Either way, any EO saying anything close to that would crash the value. Bluff or not.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Don't need congress for an EO. China simply made all Crypto exchanges illegal. I imagine it wouldn't be too difficult to wrote up an EO declaring all Crypto exchanges to be illegal, which I know wouldn't make it so, but the normies don't know that. And in the mean time it gives the DOJ the order to start looking at how to make it illegal and treat it as such.

Either way, any EO saying anything close to that would crash the value. Bluff or not.
Would anyone try to counter such an edict in the legal system or would everyone just fold & obey it?
 
Don't need congress for an EO. China simply made all Crypto exchanges illegal. I imagine it wouldn't be too difficult to wrote up an EO declaring all Crypto exchanges to be illegal, which I know wouldn't make it so, but the normies don't know that. And in the mean time it gives the DOJ the order to start looking at how to make it illegal and treat it as such.

Either way, any EO saying anything close to that would crash the value. Bluff or not.
Would anyone try to counter such an edict in the legal system or would everyone just fold & obey it?
Neither, cause the dancing skeleton is just wrong. An EO doesn't create new law, it chooses how to interpret existing law within the words as written. Banning cryptocurrencies would require a new law, as nothing even vaguely encroaches on it. It's why a good bit of the 'infrastructure bill does just that.

Also, normies don't really use cryptocurrency, at all. It's very much a niche thing still.

And the DOJ... doesn't even vaguely have anything to do with money. At all. It's the Department of -Justice-, it deals with federal criminal law.
 
Neither, cause the dancing skeleton is just wrong. An EO doesn't create new law, it chooses how to interpret existing law within the words as written. Banning cryptocurrencies would require a new law, as nothing even vaguely encroaches on it. It's why a good bit of the 'infrastructure bill does just that.

Also, normies don't really use cryptocurrency, at all. It's very much a niche thing still.

And the DOJ... doesn't even vaguely have anything to do with money. At all. It's the Department of -Justice-, it deals with federal criminal law.
Thank you for clearing this up. I know that Biden got his way almost instantly since he wrote/signed the EO to shut down the Keystone pipeline, so it was a concern as to whether or not the rest of the system would just obey. How's the lawsuit on Keystone going anyway?
 
Neither, cause the dancing skeleton is just wrong. An EO doesn't create new law, it chooses how to interpret existing law within the words as written. Banning cryptocurrencies would require a new law, as nothing even vaguely encroaches on it. It's why a good bit of the 'infrastructure bill does just that.

Also, normies don't really use cryptocurrency, at all. It's very much a niche thing still.

And the DOJ... doesn't even vaguely have anything to do with money. At all. It's the Department of -Justice-, it deals with federal criminal law.
You may know that, but do you trust the lawyers at the WH to know that and abide by it?

We've already seen this administration do things they know would fail and are borderline illegal to get the results they want. (Where's those guidelines from OHSA) I wouldn't put it past a lawyer to use the commerce clause in however twisted way needed to base an EO on making it illegal federally. Then the DOJ is involved.

Is that how the law works? Probably not. Do I think that matters to this administration? Not at all.
 
Day 262 of missing this nigga like you wouldn't believe.

View attachment 2609654

LOL, fucking based.

He's not wrong, though. Haiti is pretty much the definition of a shithole, and most Haitians are immersed in that shithole life. Why do you think they were living in an uber-squalid, unfit-for-humans migrant camp under a bridge in 100 degree heat like it was just another day?

Too many people in the US have no perspective on life outside the US. Especially the champagne socialist crowd that thinks letting in literally uncivilized migrants will suddenly turn them into normal, middle class Americans. Reality is that they will likely have 1 of 3 paths:
- Be foot soldier fodder in criminal orgs
- Be exploited by sex traffickers
- Be exploited as below minimum wage labor, fucking over the American poor. Especially the rural poor, many of which are black.

Or if bleeding-heart faggot progressives get their way, they can just run to daddy government and get on the dole.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clearing this up. I know that Biden got his way almost instantly since he wrote/signed the EO to shut down the Keystone pipeline, so it was a concern as to whether or not the rest of the system would just obey. How's the lawsuit on Keystone going anyway?
Lawsuit is doomed to failure, it was well within the administration's rights to cancel a pipeline that a prior administration signed off on.

You may know that, but do you trust the lawyers at the WH to know that and abide by it?

We've already seen this administration do things they know would fail and are borderline illegal to get the results they want. (Where's those guidelines from OHSA) I wouldn't put it past a lawyer to use the commerce clause in however twisted way needed to base an EO on making it illegal federally. Then the DOJ is involved.

Is that how the law works? Probably not. Do I think that matters to this administration? Not at all.
Oh, they might try to make an EO. But it -would- get slapped down basically immediately. SCOTUS has already shown it's very tired of Biden exceeding his authority. So you'd get a very short-lived EO, immediately slapped down, minor precedent set, and nowhere near the damage you seem to think would happen.
 
Last edited:
WTF i love Jan 6th now

Fauci the aids master will cure aids with an non-effective aids vaccine. But if you don't take the aids vaccine you're a right-wing, racist, homophobic shitlord.

Infest US with aids people
Cure aids
Profit
 
Okay, I don't know what's going on.
TL;DR - The left believes that the world would be a utopia if only people would stop fighting them on it and just do what they were told by the left. The only people that would oppose the left are racist, sexist, homophobic transphobes. This ignores the fact that even when you give them everything they want, they will still find a reason to be a victim.
 
It was Obama. Obama didn't want Hillary running again in 2020 and had massive fucking buyers remorse telling Biden to back the fuck off (Biden was wanting to run in 2016 and even sent out to the press fake news stories about how his dead son's dying wish was for him to run for President to spite Hillary and Bill, who "demanded the nomination" in exchange for them bending the knee to Obama in 2008).

Obama seriously believed Biden could have beaten Trump and as such, drafted Biden to run as his proxy and once Hillary/Bill basically agreed not to run again, it became fait accompli that Biden would be the nominee.
I'm confused about the amount of relative influence that Obama and the Clintons wield in the Dem party. My understanding of the party's relationship with Obama is that they're pissed at him because he ran the party like it was his private fan club and disregarded the needs of D politicians, leading to the party's massive losses (many senators and reps and over 1000 stage legislative seats) under his tenure.

The party's outreach systems collapsed under Obama and the Clintons rebuilt them for Hillary's 2016 run. She had total control over the party because she bankrolled them with the Clinton Foundation proceeds. Then after she lost the election they were somehow able to keep her from running again in 2020 and now it seems like Pelosi, Schumer and the DNC are the ones pulling the strings.

Is Obama behind any of this? Involved with Biden's run? He doesn't seem like the type to want to pull strings behind the scenes, he's interested in standing center stage in front of cheering crowds. The campaigning that Obama did for Biden felt like the absolute minimum necessary, anything less and people would be asking questions about why he wasn't supporting Joe. So what's the deal? Pelosi's visit with Soros suggests that she's looking for backing outside the usual political dynasties.
 
Is Obama behind any of this? Involved with Biden's run? He doesn't seem like the type to want to pull strings behind the scenes, he's interested in standing center stage in front of cheering crowds. The campaigning that Obama did for Biden felt like the absolute minimum necessary, anything less and people would be asking questions about why he wasn't supporting Joe. So what's the deal? Pelosi's visit with Soros suggests that she's looking for backing outside the usual political dynasties.

My thoughts? Obama is, as you note, too much of a spotlight hog to be effective for the Democratic Party. He literally sucks all the oxygen out of the room and either deliberately or inadvertently upstages everyone around him. Frankly, he doesn't give a shit or know about hyping up others and being supportive or endorsing to garner downballot success. The dude wants to be rich and hang with celebrities on yachts and shit. Which is just as well, because he's incapable of doing anything constructive at this time - even if the Dems convince him to go out and try to rally support he's either going to make it all about himself or remind people of the bitter failures of his administration to deliver on big promises. The shine is off and his message is sour.

Clinton's entire powerbase was built on the expectation that she could deliver her husband in the 90's, and eventually herself as SOS and President. That all collapsed when she lost in 2016, with a massive debt of favors and money that was going to be handled once she had the White House. We saw how after the election her 'foundation' immediately shriveled up and died, and she vanished. Everything had been suborned to support her run and eventually victory, but that was stillborn. You can't do anything with those structures even if you tried to convert them, they still have liens on them.

Its all fallen back on the general Dem superstructure, Pelosi and the others are in charge for the simple reason that they are the only survivors. The Clintons smothered most of the back bench to prevent another dark horse from bucking Hillary's ascendance, the Dem civil wars and fractionalism have taken out protégés and successors with too-violent competition and sneaky tactics. Old Hagosi and Jewmer are the only ones left that still have access to the various levers of power, the knowledge of the entire complicated machine interlinking Congress, the media, law, NGOs, etc. Their grip is old and weak, constantly slipping as things spiral out of control due to outside forces and the 'new kids' fighting for the control yokes because its 'their turn now' and they don't give a fuck if they can't reach the metaphorical pedals or see in the mirrors. These overt overtures to Soros are super-desperate, they would normally never ask for his favor openly, but confidence in the Dem's ability to deliver is rock bottom and they need unholy amounts of money to try and staunch their bleeding.

What the fuck do I know, though? I'm just some asshole in an alley with a knife, ask @Gehenna for actual analysis.
 
Last edited:
My thoughts? Obama is, as you note, too much of a spotlight hog to be effective for the Democratic Party. He literally sucks all the oxygen out of the room and either deliberately or inadvertently upstages everyone around him. Frankly, he doesn't give a shit or know about hyping up others and being supportive or endorsing to garner downballot success. The dude wants to be rich and hang with celebrities on yachts and shit. Which is just as well, because he's incapable of doing anything constructive at this time - even if the Dems convince him to go out and try to rally support he's either going to make it all about himself or remind people of the bitter failures of his administration to deliver on big promises. The shine is off and his message is sour.

Clinton's entire powerbase was built on the expectation that she could deliver her husband in the 90's, and eventually herself as SOS and President. That all collapsed when she lost in 2016, with a massive debt of favors and money that was going to be handled once she had the White House. We saw how after the election her 'foundation' immediately shriveled up and died, and she vanished. Everything had been suborned to support her run and eventually victory, but that was stillborn. You can't do anything with those structures even if you tried to convert them, they still have liens on them.

Its all fallen back on the general Dem superstructure, Pelosi and the others are in charge for the simple reason that they are the only survivors. The Clintons smothered most of the back bench to prevent another dark horse from bucking Hillary's ascendance, the Dem civil wars and fractionalism have taken out protégés and successors with too-violent competition and sneaky tactics. Old Hagosi and Jewmer are the only ones left that still have access to the various levers of power, the knowledge of the entire complicated machine interlinking Congress, the media, law, NGOs, etc. Their grip is old and weak, constantly slipping as things spiral out of control due to outside forces and the 'new kids' fighting for the control yokes because its they're turn now' and they don't give a fuck if they can't reach the metaphorical pedals or see in the mirrors. These overt overtures to Soros are super-desperate, they would normally never ask for his favor openly, but confidence in the Dem's ability to deliver is rock bottom and they need unholy amounts of money to try and staunch their bleeding.

What the fuck do I know, though? I'm just some asshole in an alley with a knife, ask @Gehenna for actual analysis.
All looks good to me, I could nitpick the hell out of various things on it, but it's a good enough general overview that'd really be... pointless.
 
This can be taken both ways. One: He's done kicking the can.

Two? To quote Mr. Baseball: "It's gonna cost ya, chief."

I think they're flat out taunting them with it. He knows this is costing political capital and goodwill they don't have. And they're gonna have to pay even more next time.


Meanwhile:

View attachment 2609146

View attachment 2609148
View attachment 2609149

Losing the Senate in 2022. And Losing 7 house seats in 2024.

And god willing, with enough MAGA + a Resurgent and PISSED OFF Trump to push an anti-leftist agenda that will knock GloboHomo's plans back 20-30 years, at least.
This kike is doing what every commie is doing "oh biden's approval is in the shitter, its clearly because he isn't socialist enough, he needs to be woker and fuck the country harder!" you can't trust his data because like most data analysts the last century they start at conclusion and then use the data. its the 6 million from 2 ovens in 10 minutes all over again
I just told a friend of mine, heavily into crypto that he should get out. After China banned it, it's only aatter of time before the rest of the goverments do.

The response was "Nope. They wouldn't do that. Too much trouble/money involved to do that".

Biggest problem with business people's world views tend to be they think it's about the money. It's not about the money. It's about control and power. Money is a means to an end and we have seen for the past decade with all the social media companies they have no problem throwing money away if it means they control what people see and think.

Hopefully people will figure it out, but judging by this forum, it'll be way to late.
one of the biggest lies people are told is "its nothing personal its just business" or "its all about the money" Its only once you take the fash pill and realize why (((they))) want you to believe its about greed and to go "fuck you i got mine" on everyone around you do you suddenly realize how fucking stupid most of your people's rich truely are. look at Notch, he could easily put all his billion in a mutual fund, and announce his own Koch bros-esque fund to stop this woke shit in gaming using exclusively the interest he'd have about $100 million to use. hell even if he didn't want to deal with politics.just the amount of science research especially stuff darpa lets fall by the wayside. that would greatly benefit the world with a couple million in research.

Its why the left wins, look at the summer of george protests, on the rare chance you got arrested you were out before dawn the next day. didn't even miss work. meanwhile kyle needed to wait until a singular rich guy finally helped months down the road before he got freed. the right is too into the "fuck you i got mine" mentality for protests to ever truely work for them
To be fair to Lincoln he was assassinated before he got to finish his second term so we have no idea if he could've actually resettled the former slaves back into Africa, I may be mistaken but I believe up to that point he was still interested in the idea of resettling the former slaves back into Africa.
why do people keep repeating this lie it truely makes me MATI. the extremists ruled congress and Lincoln would have gotten impeached like Johnson did if he even attempted to introduce legislation. why do assholes have opinions on stuff without knowing the players. its literally like trying to talk about the senate now but not knowing any of the senators.
i'd do a big call on it hitting $200 very soon, the problem is when.
View attachment 2609588
Legal warfare is great stuff
texas did in 2 days what trump couldn't figure out.
The Walmart nearby is paying $15/hr for cart pushers. In a red city that doesn’t have a $15 minimum wage.
Walmart had a $15/hr standard introduced a few years back
 
Linwood is obviously a fraud/cheat

1633791959882.png


Taliban says..Fuck you Biden

1633791979979.png


Someone is paying this "activist" to commit several international crimes

1633792016115.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back