Now this is really interesting. Considering the FDA livestream was singularly about the risk of approving Pfizer boosters, and considering Dr. Kirsch's team's research into the danger of the vaccine, I'm really intrigued that he would say the Pfizer is safest of the three US vaccines on offer. Gonna need to dig in after some sleep but I wonder if his team has found whatever disparity between them that makes the Nordic countries say the same.
This is also fantastic because it gives credit to the idea that the four countries currently halting Moderna aren't doing so simply because Pfizer is slipping them a twenty under the table, so to speak. See what I mean about more information leading to less conspiratorial thinking?
This one is interesting, too. Goes to show this doctor and his team take Covid deadly seriously for everyone, including kids. He also emphasizes the treatment protocols (listed in detail below this point in the article ) to be as accessible as possible, perhaps even for other doctors who might want to enact them with patients. As for the list, I get that he's trying to do good and it's true that most doctors aren't even encouraged, let alone taught, how to treat Covid-positive patients. Still can't shake the feeling he's trying to give his buddies some extra exposure though. I also don't like that the "covidlonghaulers" link 404's.
Speaking of "long-haul Covid", that's the part that really surprises me most. The only time I've heard something similar was from Canadian articles on "Long Covid", which as we've touched on here in the past had a symptom list ranging from "coughing" to "suicidal ideation". It was ridiculous. Even so, here the term seems to focus on "heart, lung and brain" risks, particularly because, as we've already addressed, once those tissues are scarred from inflammation you're in for problems.