Covid/mRNA Vaccine Info General - "Covid Seasonal Flu Vaccines is Society's New Normal" - FDA

Ive been concerned about the Pfizer shot for some time now. If the science isn't lying, it DOES help reduce the chance of hospitalization and death if infected by covid, but the potential severity of side effects especially in young boys seems a tad too high to be acceptable for a vax that is pushed so hard on the population. Does any other commonly-taken vaccine have as high of a chance of bad side effects as Pfizer and other similar covid vaccines?
In my country we have no choice but to use Pfizer, there are no other options available. That, and there is going to be a two-class system due to the introduction of covid certificates, mandates, etc. Honestly I am more concerned about political overreach over this whole covid/vaccine fiasco than the vaccine itself.

Aside from the serious side effects like perimyocarditis, why does the pfizer vax cause such a long lasting pain in the muscles? Does the contents of the vaccine break down tissue or something? Because I got my first vax about 5 days ago and my arm still feels like it has experienced internal bleeding or trauma and hasn't recovered yet, like a deep bruise that covers a large area. By what mechanism does the vaccine cause such damage in the muscle tissue? I get yearly flu vaccinations and have had plenty of other jabs, none of which have causes such a long lasting soreness. Some sources online say that it is just the body causing inflammation in reaction to the virus proteins, but then why haven't other vaccines done this for me?

Edit: Also just heard on the local radio of our Health Minister saying "If you catch covid you are VERY LIKELY to get VERY SICK and end up in HOSPITAL". Isn't it more likely that people just get flu symptoms that dont require hospitalization, not to mention some proportion of the population dont get symptoms at all? I do agree that it can be very scary to be hospitalized with severe covid symptoms but i don't think these make up the majority of cases like the country's health minister seems to imply. Its always lying and fearmongering....
What you're describing sounds like an inflammatory response. Swelling and pain.

From the happenings thread, there's evidence that the lipid carrier in the vaccine is a cause of massive inflammation all by itself.
The LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) used in the mRNA shots are highly inflammatory locally (ie the deltoid; the site of injection) and systemically (ie throughout the body).



View attachment 2623794


The Moderna and Pfizer shots are poison. The mRNA component has potential long term effects that have yet to be seen. The LNPs component are guaranteed to cause tons of inflammation that seems to get worse with each booster.
 
Gonna update the OP. Thanks for making my life easier with the original and double links!
This is unreal to me. Firstly, it's a good thing and that's always as welcome as a drop of rain on parched earth. However, it's not like the judge's ruling established something against the mandates or otherwise. It's literally just the judge reinforcing basic American rights. "Hey, stop penalizing your employees for seeking medical and religious exemption." - That's it. That such a basic fundamental function of law would be regarded as a "win" to anyone goes to show how severely we've accelerated down the path of madness.

Still, though, it is a win. Every court ruling in favor of the common man is yet another piece of strength to finally stop this chaos. I wish more employees would start taking their employers to court like these and the hospital workers in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The more people just roll over the worse it will get.
<snip>

You're welcome! I noticed a little while ago that certain Tor circuits will trigger Captchas or other annoyance when trying to access archives, so I started including direct links, in case that stupidity was tangling up other people too.

If you're interested in bits of good news, you should pop by the main Coronavirus Megathread periodically, that's where I've usually been sharing stuff on protests and legal pushback to mandates. There's definitely a lot more happening in that regard than is tending to make the news. I've picked out two I posted over there that I think are especially worth watching how they might play out in the future -- one has a very public-sympathetic protagonist, and the other involves... the IRS (!!!). I'm including some more info with each to make this crosspost less lazy.

Player 2 Has Joined: IRS Union Employees

The IRS's own employees are starting to fight, having staged a protest in Ogden, Utah. Interestingly, the National Treasury Employees Union that they're a part of spoke in support of them, so Chapter 67 might be the first, not the last, bit of action out of there. (Direct / Archive)

Highlights:

Federal employees were reportedly told they had to be fully vaccinated by Nov. 1 — or risk being fired. According to the National Treasury Employees Union, most of the employees participating in the protest have been vaccinated because of the mandate. “They have a right to be upset,” said Robert Lawrence, the president of NTEU Chapter 67. “They should have a choice.”

Expanded Content:

Interviews with an NTEU (IRS union) rep and Chad Hooper, an IRS manager union rep. (Archive)
“IRS employees, just like the general public, have mixed views. We have heard from some employees who do not believe vaccination should be a condition of employment. We have heard from others who believe the workplace will be safer knowing all of their coworkers are vaccinated,” Tony Reardon, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, or NTEU, said in a statement to the Standard-Examiner.
Chad Hooper, executive director of the Professional Managers Association, which represents IRS managers, said the mandate is “a welcome departure” from the Biden administration’s “unrealized plan to test unvaccinated employees.”

Hooper also expressed a measure of acceptance for the mandate, which cites findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, that vaccination is the best way to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus and prevent infection. The mandate also notes that the Federal Drug Administration has authorized use of the COVID-19 vaccines.

“As an association representing IRS leaders, it is our view that the federal workforce should defer to the expertise of our peers across government. As we would expect our colleagues at the CDC and FDA to trust our tax expertise, so too we expect the IRS workforce to trust their medical expertise,” he said in a statement.

An internal letter from an anonymous IRS employee. (Archive)
We recently had an “all-hands” IT meeting with the CIO and HR Director to cover “… priorities for the upcoming fiscal year, as well as the current official guidance on the agency’s plans for a wider return to the workplace.” Since the Q&A time was limited and there was an excess of people in the Q&A queue, I didn’t get an opportunity to ask my question. So, I’m trying to get an answer via the email process that was mentioned during the call; however, it’s been a couple of weeks since the CIO all-hands meeting and I’m still waiting for answers which probably will never come. To be fair, our CIO and the HR director were very above board during the meeting and seemed very concerned for our safety and for the decisions that everyone has to make. They made the call seem very personal and not business-like.
Here’s what I sent to my management & HR teams:
First, I truly appreciate that our management team’s first priority is doing their best to keep all employees safe. Also, I believe our CIO mentioned that currently there are no changes being made to our telework status which I believe is something like “… if an employee can perform their job remotely, then there is no reason to enter an IRS facility.”
So, I have two questions:
  1. 1. How (and why) can someone who is 100% telework, does not have a ‘customer facing’ job, is the only member of their Branch in the State (i.e. Michigan, Colorado, Florida), and, who has no need what-so-ever to enter any IRS facility, be forced to even tell their vaccination status and be forced to be vaccinated?
  2. 2. What will be the ‘Process’ to handle those who make the private choice to not follow what is being dictated?
Mike, as I mentioned, I plan to retire — looking at 12/31/2021 as my last day. However, I may be forced to retire earlier depending upon the mandates that are in place and how the IRS might enforce them. Even if I was not planning to retire, I don’t take it kindly when someone dictates to me that I must be <fill this with most anything> — i.e. vaccinated for COVID, flu, anything; or can’t have a family gathering at Thanksgiving with more than 10 people or that I must be masked if we gather indoors; or that I have to be quarantined because I came in the vicinity of someone else who is/was sick; and so on.
My wife and I are responsible for our health and the health of our family; and we worry about our kids (and grandkids) all the time. However, it is not our place to tell our adult kids that they and the members of their families must be vaccinated. We will support our kids and their families no matter what choices they make.
In my opinion, COVID is here to stay and there will be a yearly shot just like the seasonal flu. To basically confirm this, just look at all of the info that the CDC is saying about the current booster shots. Now, if I understand everything, no one is ‘fully vaccinated’ unless they have the booster shot. It was not too long ago, that a ‘fully vaccinated’ person just needed the vaccine. So, I can see it now, next year no one will be ‘fully vaccinated’ unless they get next year’s booster shot in 2022; then 2023, then … And, anyone who is not ‘fully vaccinated’ will be an outcast; forced to leave their employment; potentially not allowed into stores unless they can prove vaccination; not allowed to travel on an airplane, bus or train; etc.

If I had not planned to retire in 2021, it is very likely that I would not stay working for the Federal government. That decision to leave government employment is totally due to the current administration’s mandates. I enjoy my job, working for the IRS, and working with the people who make up my team.
My family has been directly impacted by COVID and by all of the mandates that have been given for the past 1-2 years. Family members have lost jobs, lost their small businesses; been sick; been vaccinated or refuse to be vaccinated. The people in power positions have basically pitted family member against family member; but this is exactly what they want. Fear. A terrorist or the enemy is only as strong as the fear that they instill in others.

Teenage Civil Disobedience

A legal flashpoint regarding mask mandates in schools is developing in Wyoming. 16 year old honor roll student, Grace Smith, was trespassed by her own school for repeatedly refusing to comply with the mandate (Archive). Police were called and she was arrested and charged (Archive). WY state senator Anthony Bouchard (R-Cheyenne) has taken an interest in this incident.

Videos of her arrest, taken by her father, Andy Smith (Youtube Channel):

Part 1:



Part 2:



Bouchard and Smith discuss the mandate and her civil disobedience (Facebook):

Note -- This piece of shit video does not want to reattach due to some combination of the forum itself and my ass-tastic ISP going down and up tonight like a $2 whore, go to the original post over in the Coronavirus Megathread in Happenings to watch it.

Expanded Content:

Grace Smith and her dad were on Fox on Oct 13. (Archive)

Grace Smith, who was joined on the interview with her father Andy, told the FOX News host she would defy the mask mandate again if she went to school but that isn’t likely because it was no longer a safe environment.

“There have been threats to my family and there was a threat of a school shooting last week,” she said. “So I won’t be returning any time super soon.”

Also, @secret watcher you need to work on your aim with those top hats -- *this* is a post where I am (literally) Mad At The Internet thanks to $SHITTY_ISP.
:shit-eating:
 
@SCSI negrates here are even more meaningless than reddit. people only hand them out for two reasons: they're autistic and/or they think it's funny watching the other guy tardrage about it.

Great post otherwise. Very informative. I got the impression the arresting officers weren't convinced that their actions were necessary, but didn't have much choice about it.
 
Edit: Also just heard on the local radio of our Health Minister saying "If you catch covid you are VERY LIKELY to get VERY SICK and end up in HOSPITAL". Isn't it more likely that people just get flu symptoms that dont require hospitalization, not to mention some proportion of the population dont get symptoms at all? I do agree that it can be very scary to be hospitalized with severe covid symptoms but i don't think these make up the majority of cases like the country's health minister seems to imply. Its always lying and fearmongering....
Hospitalization rate is like 10% at most, and even those numbers are dubious because there is no breakdown of hospitalized with covid vs hospitalized from covid.
Actual chance of ending up in the ICU/critical care is even lower than that.
 
So is it true that all these vaccines contain fetal cells?
As far as I know the answer is generally "No", but it's nuanced. The process of developing the vaccine involves cultivating it with a lab grown copy of a fetal cell line. It's not like they are using baby cells as ingredients in the vaccine itself, as I recall. Here's some stuff to consider now that you brought it up:
vaccines and fetal cell lines.png

Also WTF? "The COVID-19 vaccine (J&J/Janssen) is made using fetal retinal cells." That's news to me. Anyway, here's a .gov one:
covid fetal cells.png

I'll attach the full PDF here and below the OP for good measure. Point is, the Covid vax and vaccines in general do not contain dead baby cells. However, they are used in the creation of the vaccines, though we're reassured it's just lab grown copies or cultures of the original cells from killed babies in the 60's and 80's. This is part of the reason people like Christians, Muslims, etc. can have Religious Exemption, because using the vaccines can be seen as a tacit approval of using aborted childrens' bodies for science, or which in turn is approval of abortion, etc.
This is also one of many reasons why people during Trump's administration had petitioned and advised him to open a thorough scientific investigation into vaccine development, basically to quell the conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxer nonsense once and for all by simply having transparency and studies published without controversy. The abortion cells thing had some concerned that utilizing the cultures of these cells for broad demographics could be part of the various adverse effects certain people can have to certain vaccines. Also people wanted to know if Big Pharma was lying and pulling a Planned Parenthood ("muh lamborguini" etc.) but that was beside the point. Ultimately Trump heard the idea, considered it, and then went to BILL GATES to ask HIM if it was a good idea. The President. Asked Bill Gates. Gates, who has a huge investment in the vaccine market and otherwise. Trump asked him if it was a good idea to investigate vaccine development and potential adverse effects, and Gates said "No, that's a bad thing. Don't do that."
And then Trump listened to him and never did it.
And then Trump started Operation Warp Speed (cuz you see Bill Gates kept advising him that he needed to have a legacy in something like vaccine development etc.)
And then Trump shit himself and now cries on a blog about how no one gives him credit for Covid vax.
GOD I hate that retarded orange
TL;DR From what we can tell with the info on offer, a certain couple copies of fetal cell lines derived from couple aborted babies in the 60's and 80's are used in the development of vaccines but they are not incorporated into the vaccine itself so as to be shooting human DNA into your DNA.
 

Attachments

EDIT - Also I wonder if this thread shouldn't be split into health-related stuff, and a second thread that only deals with all the mandate and political stuff associated with the vaccinations.
Good post overall. On this matter, though, I don't agree and I'll explain why: Considering the aim of the thread and where its posted it's far better and cleaner this way without dividing the sections of the OP into multiple threads and cluttering the site. We have enough Covid threads to begin with, and besides, each section of the thread is necessary to the main subject and focus here, and each of them tie directly into the next since all of them are ultimately about people's health and medical science:
- The "Infodemic", a Section 230-targeting censorship of supposedly harmful "medical misinformation", is supposedly to protect people's health,
- The Government mandates are meant to protect people's health,
- Big Pharma factors into this because, just like with every other private sector of industry, pharmacology is also rife with money-first mentality and not filled exclusively with saints who only care about people's health, etc. etc. Those are just some examples.

See? It's all connected to the H&F subject, too deeply to be separated, especially considering the aim of the thread: to make a reasonable, fair and balanced case for those concerned about/against the Covid vaccines, proving that they are not simply "vaccine hesitant" and not "anti-vax"--claims which are actually impacting people's health and personal relationships since they were being taught by government and otherwise to dismiss all concern and anyone who is concerned.

Medical science is always the main focus but all other aspects are also necessarily involved. It's an interconnected subject which factors into our physical and mental health in every aspect. So far we've maintained our goal of collecting and collating all verifiable information which would help others understand each other and make informed decisions for themselves, and just as intended we've so far been able to help people have discussions with loved ones without it devolving into "anti-vax vs uber-vax" bickering.

No partisan hackery touted as fact, no misnformation or censorship of information to taint the discussion--each section, separate but equally vital to the subject and our well being, has been kept thanks to posters like you and everyone else who contribute info, editing suggestions, critiques, experiences and further.
Plus I've seen some other threads, even Covid threads, in H&F and I think we're actually doing great when it comes to keeping our information clean from partisan hackery and staying focused. Posters like you and so many others who contribute help, info, edit suggestions and otherwise keep this effective and alive. To split the sections into different threads would only divide the info gathering and clutter the site, too, to the point where it might be deemed better to have one super mega ultra Covid thread...but then that would be like the confused and jumbled mess of the election thread, rife with in-fighting, bickering, etc. etc. Not good for anyone. I mean just imagine if this thread, the "Are you getting vaccinated?" thread and the "Covidiots" threads were merged into one just to save the site clutter?
Or imagine how many different threads we'd have if each section of our OP was made into its own thread? It'd be nuts.
TL;DR It's not only necessary for subject of the thread and relevant to the board its in but it also works out well this way for everyone, thanks to everyone.
 
Medical science is always the main focus but all other aspects are also necessarily involved. It's an interconnected subject which factors into our physical and mental health in every aspect. So far we've maintained our goal of collecting and collating all verifiable information which would help others understand each other and make informed decisions for themselves, and just as intended we've so far been able to help people have discussions with loved ones without it devolving into "anti-vax vs uber-vax" bickering.

Thanks for the clarification on the thread scope, I'd always assumed that this one was strictly for rounding up medsci stuff, and legal/speech issues were mostly intended to funnel into the Happenings megathread. The former isn't my specialty, but the latter two I'm all over. I'll add this thread to my content delivery route, especially as the split developing in the courts on mandates and exceptions should get spicy in the near future. :heart-full:
 
Ive been concerned about the Pfizer shot for some time now. If the science isn't lying, it DOES help reduce the chance of hospitalization and death if infected by covid, but the potential severity of side effects especially in young boys seems a tad too high

I just need to speak some peace here because people are missing the bigger picture

In the wild most Myocarditis happens without symptoms, yet lasting damaging is being. Everyone recieving these shots is getting some degree of Myocarditis...every single one. Wether they feel symptomatic enough to run to the hospital is another story entirely but...

Everyone taking these shots is shaving a decade off their life and will have heart and vascular problems down the road. For some the mRNA goes into the blood and the effects are immediate, for others the damage is subtle. We seeing atheletes literally telling us something is wrong with them after these shots yet they felt nothing


if you got a Covid Jab and took a D-Dimer afterward you would find clotting in 100%. Its just what the shot does (Its also what Covid does even worse..so im not saying the jabs are worthless)

Here is the big problem with this Fiasco. You would never be exposed to Coronavirus 4 times a year, yet here you are about to take a 4th Booster probably before the end of the year...lets not count a breakthough infections that is extremely common lately with newer variatns...so that is FIVE god damn infections/exposure to Spike protiens. Think about that for a second. Think about the labor shortages we are experiencing, think about the supply chain disruptions...look at the obituary page. Something very very bad is happening right now and its related to these vaccines. The 3rd and 4th boosters are just the same as the 2nd booster. Moderna and Johnson and Johnson are slowly being banned for all ages in several countries specifically for this reason...they have hurting everyone who takes them and that list is growing everyday...Of course now that billions rushed to take them...too late

Karl Denninger on tickerforum has found 700,000 missing people under the age of 40 in Department of Labor Statistics that were there in December but have left since April. That trend is accelerating at a rapid pace and hit 1 million in August. It can literally only be citizens leaving the country or people dieing.

also there is an active conspiracy from the top down to suppress this information and call it something else. See below

If a 35 or 50 year old has a massive heart attack after the vaccine. Was it the Vaccine or just a heart attack? See the problem

 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, didn't they say earlier this year that vaccine mixing is dangerous?
I don't recall that; I remember at the end of last year a trial being started by AstraZeneca to pair their vaccine with even Russia's Sputnik V one:

"Mixing Covid Vaccines Should Be Possible, Oxford Trial Head Says", November 19, 2020 (archived: https://archive.ph/OZbcL)
"AstraZeneca to Test Combining Its Covid-19 Vaccine With Russia’s", December 11, 2020 (archived: https://archive.ph/5s7Yc)

As well as the Oxford-AstraZeneca with the Pfizer/BioNTech one:

"UK trial to mix and match Covid vaccines to try to improve potency; Pilot planned for January will give subjects a shot of both Oxford/AstraZeneca and Pfizer/BioNTech versions", 7 Dec 2020 (archived: https://archive.ph/zleL7)

Though it does appear that the CDC rules that vaccines for the moment should preferably not be mixed, due to limited data, they don't consider such mixing to be dangerous and in fact it is allowed in "exceptional situations" (references to such I've bolded in emphasis below):

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna)

Data on the safety and efficacy of a mixed-product series are limited. Both doses of the series should be completed with the same product.

. . .

In exceptional situations in which the mRNA vaccine product given for the first dose cannot be determined or is no longer available, any available mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may be administered at a minimum interval of 28 days between doses to complete the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series. In situations where the same mRNA vaccine product is temporarily unavailable, it is preferable to delay the second dose to receive the same product than to receive a mixed series using a different product. If two doses of different mRNA COVID-19 vaccine products are administered in these situations (or inadvertently), no additional doses of either product are recommended at this time. Such persons are considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19 ≥2 weeks after receipt of the second dose of an mRNA vaccine.

Janssen vaccine

The safety and efficacy of Janssen COVID-19 vaccine administered after an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine has not been established. However, in limited, exceptional situations where a patient received the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine but is unable to complete the series with either the same or different mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (e.g., due to contraindication), a single dose of Janssen COVID-19 vaccine may be considered at a minimum interval of 28 days from the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose.

. . .

Patients who receive Janssen COVID-19 vaccine after a dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine should be considered to have received a valid, single-dose Janssen vaccination—not a mixed vaccination series—and are considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19 ≥2 weeks after receipt of the single dose of the Janssen vaccine.
Archived: https://archive.ph/jnBmv

It looks like mixing vaccines SHOULD be safe, and the only reason one should think they are not is because the data appears to be limited at present.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Another promising therapeutic option. This one acts on the TMPRSS2 protein and prevents the spike protein from activating.
EXCELLENT! 🎉 Mind you, the way they almost paint it as a silver bullet for coronaviruses and even influenza sets off alarm bells to me, particularly from what I overheard about Fauci & Friends trying to push for a universal flu vax to inject into month old babies. But this right here is the kind of research we desperately need and I'm excited. If this proves true then we could in the very least stop being so damn desperate for the Covid vax and utterly kick the knees out from under the global vax enforcement mandates.
Most especially, though, is just how effective this potential treatment option seems to be so far. It just trumps anything we have right now by miles. God willing it goes somewhere without getting impeded, and soon (but not rushed).

It looks like mixing vaccines SHOULD be safe, and the only reason one should think they are not is because the data appears to be limited at present.
I've linked this post into the update with @CreamyHerman’s articles since I think they make great companion pieces for a fuller picture. From what I saw from the NYT article it seems like the main concern was simply a lack of data, which the WebMD article is reporting as finally having, at least in its early stages of study. I'm skeptical that mixing vaccines is ever a good idea, let alone to make them more effective. I've never heard of such a thing before, but then again we've never had vaccines like these before either.
Hopefully it's not just another instance of "Well, it's not working like it should so let's just pump more of it into them", like we first saw from Pfizer etc. back when the reality of Covid's variants were first breaking into study (that can be found in the Archive Post). Like with anything else, only time will tell.

I'm more surprised that the common zeitgeist led so many to think that mixing vaccines was always known as dangerous. I'm with Creamy. Could've sworn the CDC or someone spoke against it as a matter of fact, not just researchers saying we need more data (I miss when we had more articles with such transparency). Good job finding these links, you two!

Karl Denninger on tickerforum has found 700,000 missing people under the age of 40 in Department of Labor Statistics that were there in December but have left since April. That trend is accelerating at a rapid pace and hit 1 million in August. It can literally only be citizens leaving the country or people dieing.
I'd believe it but that's a huge claim to make. Do you have any articles or resources I could cite to back it up? As for all the downplaying of Myocarditis and how people could end up with long-term damage despite not feeling immediate effect--yeah, that's bothered me for a while now. It's why I gave the medical info on myocarditis and pericarditis in the same spoiler tag updating the CDC & others' conclusion of the Covid vax's causal links to these as adverse effects.
"it's just rare!" and "It's only minor!" when it comes to potential heart disease is retarded.
Edit: lol we have the word filter back

The real reason for all of this brought to you by Klaus Schwab

View attachment 2628960
>World Economic Forum
bison approved.gif
 
Last edited:
...and with all the talk about Covid having a really low mortality after all, it shouldn't be forgotten that catching Covid itself still does have a whole set of risks associated with it which might not kill you, but are still serious. The problem with this is that the data on these conditions is murky as hell, since it seems anything from depression to heart problems are lumped in together as "long Covid", making the comparison with vaccination side effects much harder.
Dr. Sebastian Rushworth M.D. did a good job explaining the over-hyped phenomenon of "long covid".

The other thing with COVID is that its entire plausible a serious case who ends up with viral pneumonia is going to leave some damage, as well as some tissue scarring if (God forbid) you end up on a vent.
The problem is they act like the majority of us who only had mild colds or no symptoms at all are suddenly going to develop lung complications or neurological disorders from a temporary virus which was already purged from our systems.
 
MAJOR update incoming (although it's from a month+ ago). Need to parse through some of this info but I want to share it in the thread first. Essentially this is a direct follow-up to the "Vaccines Kill More than They Save?" section of the OP, and this time there's plenty of receipts to sort through if people want to prove/disprove it.



Sorry for the poor quality, I used OBS since I didn't find this on youtube for download and then converted it with VLC. It's long but worth listening to; the above is a video, heavily edited by me for time, of Steve Kirsch, head of the Early Covid-19 Research Fund and voice behind those clips in the OP taken from the FDA livestream. He sorta sounds like a negative universe Bill Gates. Anyway, after considering him and that article which brought into question his character and information, I came across an article which linked back to the above video, itself citing many sources taken from his presentation (which can all be found on his website apparently). The article he wrote recently was published on Trial Site News called "Proof the CDC is Lying to the World About Covid Vaccine Safety".
The article links:
The full video: https://rumble.com/vn3y22-tfnt9-cdc...-members-should-resign-for-failing-to-sp.html

All-in-all it's a matter of how the Covid vaccines work, the adverse effects correlated to them, the FDA's refusal to acknowledge the correlation beyond heart inflammation (and even then, mainly only in young males), a Dr. Peter Schirmacher and much more regarding data and study. It's a lot but if I went through it you can, too.
While some of what he says is either sarcastic or meant to be sensational (I edited out fluff and certain things to remain focused on data I could find for myself if pursued. I did pursue two major sticking points to me from the video, and they proved true:
8_3_2021 Dr. Peter Schirmacher, Director of Pathological Institute of the University of Heidel...png
9_14_2021 Peer Review Published Study_5-1 Death Ratio Vaccine vs Covid.png

- German World Respected Chief Pathologist: https://freewestmedia.com/2021/08/0...ogist-sounds-alarm-on-fatal-vaccine-injuries/
- "Why Are We Vaccinating Children?" Study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437699/ , https://archive.md/9Swwn
- Another study "The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome" (Paywalled): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X20312548?via=ihub
I have not heard a single thing about either this world renown German Chief Pathologist's findings (from back in August) or the peer reviewed study that corroborates Kirsch's own research, published just last month. Huge updates like these are slipping through the cracks, likely because their implications are such that they can't be so easily hand-waved away. It makes me recall the VAERs whistleblower (in the OP) and how her peers in her hospital were being told to stop reporting so many incidents of adverse effects from the Covid vaccines. This is big news, very big and very much the kind of news people don't want becoming mainstream.

As I said, the video is long but I wanted to keep in his explanation for his reasoning and interpretation of public data, as well as most of his results when comparing the amount of reporting adverse effects from vaccines in previous years compared to the Covid vaccines--and singularly, specifically the Covid vaccines.


TL;DR Yet more information being provided to show these vaccines are not remotely as safe as they are touted to be (which boggles the mind considering we already learned they aren't as effective as said to be either, at least with regards to Covid's variants).
EDIT: Also I'm putting in here the PDF Kirsch provided called "Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America".
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back