Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

The pocket of the litigants, not 3rd parties
One can argue that once he receives a donation it's his - person who made the donation can't use the money, Josh can therefore by any standards the money changed hands.

Joshua Moon goes into a narcissistic rage any time - and I mean, ANYTIME - he doesn't like someone holding him accountable.
Check out Ethan raging (at Rekieta), watch video archives in this thread. It's fucking funny.

If I recall, she threw insults at me.
And brags about having abortion. Not sure if it's true because I can't imagine any guy wanting to have sex with her.
 
View attachment 2631634





You understand that all of these are oxymorons, right?


View attachment 2631634


Literally the opposite since, at least, the 1970's.

Sure they can.

Lol, of course he did.

View attachment 2631652
View attachment 2631653
View attachment 2631654

Is Mark Herring secretly Lina M. Khan? The things Mel teaches us...


Please do. I can't wait that saga and your another inevitable failure.

You still fail to understand FDCPA. Which is weird, because you claim the act is pretty simple.

Please show this website having been charged with Cyberstalking. I'll wait.

False.

View attachment 2631634
Ho Ka Terence Yung was charged with cyberstalking and sentenced to 48 months in jail last I heard. Nothing on a website that I can recall.

Oh yeah! There's also the two ebay ex execs too, not sure what came of that.
 
Gotta keep my eye on you



The pocket of the litigants, not 3rd parties





Joshua Moon goes into a narcissistic rage any time - and I mean, ANYTIME - he doesn't like someone holding him accountable.



Hm, interesting. If I recall, she threw insults at me. Time for "eye for eye"?
Just going off Ashley Jankowski's pic I can say she looks racist and low class Southern. The kind of person Id be scared to take my African American friend or trans friends around. Seems like she really dislikes diverse folks.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah People executing a court order are not debt collectors, idiot. A debt collector represents a creditor who doesn't have a court order. Someone with a court order carries the full force and effect of the law, they will be accompanied by law enforcement whose duty it is to carry out lawful court orders, and you trying to interfere with their execution of the order would be in criminal contempt of court; additionally, they can and will use reasonable force to ensure their own safety and their successful completion of the court order.

I halfway wish you weren't just posturing, because it'd be fucking hilarious if this ended with Sheriff's deputies showing up and you going down in a hail of gunfire. But I know you're a coward, and what would actually happen is you'd piss yourself and then you'd try to sue them for carrying out their legal duties. And your lawsuit would be dismissed, like all of your other frivolous and baseless lawsuits.
 
Last edited:
One can argue that once he receives a donation it's his - person who made the donation can't use the money, Josh can therefore by any standards the money changed hands.
It doesn't matter where the money came from. Third parties can pay your legal costs and you can still be entitled to attorneys' fees. It's been that way in VA for at least 51 years.
Ho Ka Terence Yung was charged with cyberstalking and sentenced to 48 months in jail last I heard. Nothing on a website that I can recall.

Oh yeah! There's also the two ebay ex execs too, not sure what came of that.
What part of my comment are you replying to?
 
Now someone can correct me if I' m wrong here, but Null doesn't actually need your address, at least not directly. The only need for your residential address would be to give to whatever collection agency is assigned to collect from you, something that I don't think Null can get your address from anyway.
Null would be 100% entitled to get her address if he's got a court-ordered judgement to execute against her property; in fact, her stupid "victim protection" thing where she's got a P.O. box and the State of Virginia knows her actual real address? They're not fucking protecting her from court orders; I'm reasonably sure that they'd give him her address. Or he could subpoena it from her cell phone carrier, or there would be various other ways of obtaining it.

Hiding from a court order is difficult. Melinda is overly confident and will not be able to back up her big talk when it comes down to reality.
 
It doesn't matter where the money came from. Third parties can pay your legal costs and you can still be entitled to attorneys' fees. It's been that way in VA for at least 51 years.
I believe someone explained that all that's required is Josh being billed by Hardin and in theory they could even agree that the payment will be made after Josh collects.
 
Hiding from a court order is difficult. Melinda is overly confident and will not be able to back up her big talk when it comes down to reality.
Come one, surely you understand that it's as easy as telling the court "nu uh, you no can do that meanie-pants!" ?

I believe someone explained that all that's required is Josh being billed by Hardin and in theory they could even agree that the payment will be made after Josh collects.
Yeah, I recall various users commenting something to that effect. I mostly stuck with debunking the irrelevancy of her "crowdfunding" argument.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah People executing a court order are not debt collectors, idiot. A debt collector is a creditor who doesn't have a court order. Someone with a court order carries the full force and effect of the law, they will be accompanied by law enforcement whose duty it is to carry out lawful court orders, and you trying to interfere with their execution of the order would be in criminal contempt of court; additionally, they can and will use reasonable force to ensure their own safety and their successful completion of the court order.

I halfway wish you weren't just posturing, because it'd be fucking hilarious if this ended with Sheriff's deputies showing up and you going down in a hail of gunfire. But I know you're a coward, and what would actually happen is you'd piss yourself and then you'd try to sue them for carrying out their legal duties. And your lawsuit would be dismissed, like all of your other frivolous and baseless lawsuits.
Slight correction. A "debt collector" under the FDCPA is not the underlying creditor. It is a third party working on behalf of the creditor who "regularly collects debts" ("debts" for the purposes of the statute, being only debts arising out of a transaction for the purchases of goods or services for personal or household debts).

Whether or not there is a court order in place isn't relevant, but whether or not a person is a State or Federal employee (like a sheriff's deputy) is. They are not covered by the Act.
 
It doesn't matter where the money came from. Third parties can pay your legal costs and you can still be entitled to attorneys' fees. It's been that way in VA for at least 51 years.

What part of my comment are you replying to?
This part
Please show this website having been charged with Cyberstalking. I'll wait.
I don't think I've ever seen a website charged with cyberstalking. It's always an individual.

Current cyberstalking case involves a woman stalking her ex by the way.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah People executing a court order are not debt collectors, idiot. A debt collector is a creditor who doesn't have a court order. Someone with a court order carries the full force and effect of the law, they will be accompanied by law enforcement whose duty it is to carry out lawful court orders, and you trying to interfere with their execution of the order would be in criminal contempt of court; additionally, they can and will use reasonable force to ensure their own safety and their successful completion of the court order.
We're all wasting keystrokes on this because she refuses to actually read the text of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act she keeps crowing about, despite us linking it here to her and drawing specific attention to the definitions section.

Personally, I'd love to see the look on her face if a law enforcement officer gets injured on one of her booby traps and someone breaks the news to her that that's actually illegal. (See also: firing a warning shot.)
 
Personally, I'd love to see the look on her face if a law enforcement officer gets injured on one of her booby traps and someone breaks the news to her that that's actually illegal. (See also: firing a warning shot.)
I find such an event hilariously unlikely, but the entertaining part is that she's made it so that anyone coming to collect would likely now come with force sufficient to ensure that she isn't given any opportunity to carry out her threats, and to ensure their own safety if she does.

It'd be sufficiently unpleasant already to have someone roll up with the Sherriff to find out whether you've got assets to seize. But this moron went and made it so that now they're probably gonna knock her door down and have her at gunpoint instead of knocking politely.
 
Last edited:
So many crimes could have been avoided if Hollywood didn't create myths.
She really does seem to have cast herself as the lone heroine against all adds fighting for her rights to...um...not be talked about on an online forum in which she actively, graphically, and aggressively participates at great length.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah People executing a court order are not debt collectors, idiot. A debt collector is a creditor who doesn't have a court order. Someone with a court order carries the full force and effect of the law, they will be accompanied by law enforcement whose duty it is to carry out lawful court orders, and you trying to interfere with their execution of the order would be in criminal contempt of court; additionally, they can and will use reasonable force to ensure their own safety and their successful completion of the court order.

halfway wish you weren't just posturing, because it'd be fucking hilarious if this ended with Sheriff's deputies showing up and you going down in a hail of gunfire. But I know you're a coward, and what would actually happen is you'd piss yourself and then you'd try to sue them for carrying out their legal duties. And your lawsuit would be dismissed, like all of your other frivolous and baseless lawsuits.

Incorrect. Debt collectors ("Collection Agents") have court orders in their hand all the time. You're confusing "court order" with "Writ [of Fieri Facias]". The Court order is taken to a Clerk and then is converted into a Writ. Only a Writ [of Fieri Facias] comes with a Sheriff, not the court order -- to seize property or issue a Wage Garnishment to serve on an Employer.

And I repeat: a Writ [of Fieri Facias] cannot be issued against my property because it's protected by the Virginia Homestead Exemption Act, which incorporates the Virginia Poor Debtor's Exemption laws. A Writ can be issued for Wage Garnishment but that is served on an Employer, not a personal residence. The Sheriff would serve it in my employer, not at my residential house.

Therefore, if, after being served a Cease and Desist letter, a collection agent tries to come on your property, they can be jailed for Stalking. A court order does not give then the legal right to trespass after being served a Cease and Desist. That's stalking at that point..

You're also confusing a civilian using deadly force on an illegally trespassing stalker verses a law enforcement showing up. Obviously if law enforcement shows up, there's no threat to my physical safety (unless it's a KiwiFarm sociopathic Stalker impersonating an officer). I can call the police station and verify the badge number of anyone claiming to be a cop. That's why I've always maintained that I will only shoot someone if it's an immediate threat to my physical safety (which real and actual law enforcement are not a physical threat).

Some random stranger coming in the name of KiwiFarms.net is a threat to my physical safety, as I have a long history of archives documenting threats of bodily harm and death threats toward me from it's users. I also have already documented Joshua Moon's illegal threats to use Collection Agents that he randomly finds to harass me. He had the stupidity to air that on YouTube. That's different than an actual law enforcement officer or an actual employee of a collection agency coming on someone's property.

Anyhow, it's all hypothetical anyway, because Joshua Moon will never get my residential address.



We're all wasting keystrokes on this because she refuses to actually read the text of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act she keeps crowing about, despite us linking it here to her and drawing specific attention to the definitions section.

Personally, I'd love to see the look on her face if a law enforcement officer gets injured on one of her booby traps and someone breaks the news to her that that's actually illegal. (See also: firing a warning shot.)








It doesn't matter where the money came from. Third parties can pay your legal costs and you can still be entitled to attorneys' fees. It's been that way in VA for at least 51 years.
Stop trying to pull a Hardin on me. There's no case law to support that theory.







@TamarYaelBatYah Hello again. May I ask you what you've been up to lately, outside of the legal filings? If I recall correctly, weren't you in middle of writing an article, how is that coming along?
It's my Shabbat and I'm working on a study I've been doing. Hopefully it will be ready by Chanukah. It's the biggest study I've done by far. About 55 pages. Very intense but very rewarding!
 
Incorrect. Debt collectors ("Collection Agents") have court orders in their hand all the time. You're confusing "court order" with "Writ [of Fieri Facias]". The Court order is taken to a Clerk and then is converted into a Writ. Only a Writ [of Fieri Facias] comes with a Sheriff, not the court order -- to seize property or issue a Wage Garnishment to serve on an Employer.

And I repeat: a Writ [of Fieri Facias] cannot be issued against my property because it's protected by the Virginia Homestead Exemption Act, which incorporates the Virginia Poor Debtor's Exemption laws. A Writ can be issued for Wage Garnishment but that is served on an Employer, not a personal residence. The Sheriff would serve it in my employer, not at my residential house.

Therefore, if, after being served a Cease and Desist letter, a collection agent tries to come on your property, they can be jailed for Stalking. A court order does not give then the legal right to trespass after being served a Cease and Desist. That's stalking at that point..

You're also confusing a civilian using deadly force on an illegally trespassing stalker verses a law enforcement showing up. Obviously if law enforcement shows up, there's no threat to my physical safety (unless it's a KiwiFarm sociopathic Stalker impersonating an officer). I can call the police station and verify the badge number of anyone claiming to be a cop. That's why I've always maintained that I will only shoot someone if it's an immediate threat to my physical safety (which real and actual law enforcement are not a physical threat).

Some random stranger coming in the name of KiwiFarms.net is a threat to my physical safety, as I have a long history of archives documenting threats of bodily harm and death threats toward me from it's users. I also have already documented Joshua Moon's illegal threats to use Collection Agents that he randomly finds to harass me. He had the stupidity to air that on YouTube. That's different than an actual law enforcement officer or an actual employee of a collection agency coming on someone's property.

Anyhow, it's all hypothetical anyway, because Joshua Moon will never get my residential address.
Read the law, 'tard.
Stop trying to pull a Hardin on me. There's no case law to support that theory.
Literally 51 years ago:
Tidewater Patent Development Co. v. Kitchen, 421 F.2d 680 (4th Cir. 1970)

I've posted this multiple times, and every single time you managed to repress that memory. It's impressive really at how good you are at ignoring reality.
I'm betting he sent you a Cease and Decist letter.
I wish
 
Literally 51 years ago:
Tidewater Patent Development Co. v. Kitchen, 421 F.2d 680 (4th Cir. 1970)

I've posted this multiple times, and every single time you managed to repress that memory. It's impressive really at how good you are at ignoring reality
I've seen you repeatedly post cases out of context or off topic. Like yesterday when you tried to post a case about "fines" when we were talking about an "award of attorney's fees".

You do the same thing Nick Rekeita tries to do: misinformation campaign.
 
Back