Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[talk talk talk]

The Fourth Circuit adopted the lodestar method of calculating fee awards in Lyle v. Food Lion, 954 F.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1992). Using other methods of calculating fee awards is reversible error. Lyle, 954 F.2d at 988.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

@TamarYaelBatYah said:
gaslighting for a misinformation campaign


My pleadings and comments here show otherwise. I already showed your errors twice.

You're the stereotypical image of a lying attorney trying to fool the masses with "color of law".

FELLOW KIWIFARMS VICTIMS: DO NOT BELIEVE THESE LIARS HERE. YOU HAVE AN ACTIONABLE CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION AND IIED. SEEK LEGAL ADVICE OR GO PRO-SE. THESE LIARS HAVE EVERYTHING TO GAIN FROM RUNNING A MISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN. THEY DON'T WANT TO GET CAUGHT.

If you're so positive you're in the right, how are you 0 for 6? If you reply with some sad grasp like 'the judges hate me because I'm a strong womyn', then look to all of your case history. You have a history of losing. God sure must hate you to be handing your loss after loss. Your whole life is a series of losses. I'd admire your strength to continue on, if continuing on wasn't 'sling as much shit as I can hoping for a payout'.

 

[Salade Nicoise]

You know, for all the vindictive, vexatious, redneck whoremouth fuckery and potential harm this smelly redneck is causing to her victims of litigation-stalking... there's somehow nothing more egregious than her constant posting of cell phone screen shots.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

There is no way any law currently on the books would be applied as it was in Chaplinsky, in which the defendant (a Jehovah's Witness by the way) was convicted of calling a police officer a "God-damned racketeer" and a "damned fascist."

Yes, I agree it shouldn't be. But I don't believe it was overturned?

It probably isn't actionable on its own, although it is definitely the kind of thing that will cause any law enforcement who does plan on encountering you to come prepared, which makes such idiotic statements sometimes fatally stupid.

I agree, it likely isn't actionable.

Marshall on the other hand is sharp enough

You shouldn't lie, Mel.

My pleadings and comments here show otherwise. I already showed your errors twice.

You haven't shown it once, let alone twice.

FELLOW KIWIFARMS VICTIMS: DO NOT BELIEVE THESE LIARS HERE. YOU HAVE AN ACTIONABLE CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION AND IIED. SEEK LEGAL ADVICE OR GO PRO-SE. THESE LIARS HAVE EVERYTHING TO GAIN FROM RUNNING A MISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN. THEY DON'T WANT TO GET CAUGHT.

Yes, do take the advice of a women who lost every single case against us. She sure knows what she's doing. Totally.

In the meantime, Marshall has started the process. Click above.

16 minute video to debunk two hour long segment. That's gonna be real good. Totally. No sarcasm here.

>"About my wife"

Weren't you two divorced? Didn't you celebrate and count the days you could leave him? I guess all it takes is a little sex and saying "nick bad" and you're in love again.

40 seconds in, and he is already going "Ree judge bias! Mean! Bias! Bad! No give wife what want!"

6 minutes in and he hasn't gotten to Nick stuff. He is still covering the summary of the case. Flawed summary.

More than 7 minutes in (nearly halfway into the video) he finally starts the Nick stuff.

The super smart man doesn't know how to pause videos before speaking. Nor does he know how to skip to the relevant parts.

Brilliant Legal Genius Marshall shows he doesn't know how appeal process works, or indeed even the bond process. By his logic Melinda's appeal has no merit because she appealed after dismissal. Well, I suppose her appeal does have no merit, but he's legal theory is not sound.

10 minutes in, he still hasn't addressed a single point Nick made, only once addressing then name of the document. I think I can stop here. Somehow I don't think he'll manage anything legally coherent. Hasn't so far.

Black people don't deserve to be choked by a cop just because they are black. The audacity of you!

Where did I say that? You should learn to read, Mel. Also, that's ironic coming from a women who believes all non-jews should die (including blacks). Hypocrisy much?

Isolating it to that reduced a lot of the issues on the table.

Isolating it to the second prong or only to the call?

Let's fact check here:

View attachment 2632444

Do you have the required license? Also, it only applies to animals, and if on your property only ones about to kill you.

There's no case law from the US Supreme Court or Fourth Circuit supporting that theory

I literally cited you a fourth circuit court of appeals caselaw. But, hey, please cite any caselaw that says you can't get attorney's fees if your fees were paid by third party. You can't, because there is no such caselaw. Everytime people made the argument you made, they failed to provide caselaw because there is none.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Do you have a Virginia trapping license, Melinda?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Do you have a Virginia trapping license, Melinda?

Of course she doesn't

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Of course she doesn't

It's been a while since i've set a trap, let alone a bear trap. Don't they require intelligence to use, and more than a little elbow grease to open and set?

 

[Deadpool]

Of course she doesn't

She doesn't have the traps either. She's scared to death because she knows the collection agents are coming and she'll have to pay the piper. So she's trying to make up as much shit as she can to be intimidating. Not realizing her and Marshall are the least intimidating people ever.

 

[Star Platinum]

The Fourth Circuit adopted the lodestar method of calculating fee awards in Lyle v. Food Lion, 954 F.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1992). Using other methods of calculating fee awards is reversible error. Lyle, 954 F.2d at 988.

I'm not very experienced with the 4th Circuit, but isn't that holding limited to fee-shifting in FLSA cases? I don't remember what statute Hardin and Null are using for an exception to the American rule.

 

[White Baby]

So how long until Melinda's kids end up caught in a bear trap?

 

[RodgerDodger]

She doesn't have the traps either. She's scared to death because she knows the collection agents are coming and she'll have to pay the piper. So she's trying to make up as much shit as she can to be intimidating. Not realizing her and Marshall are the least intimidating people ever.

She's a pathological liar and a psychopath. Everything she says here is a lie. Everything she files in court is well stirred bullshit spit out using google. She is quite possibly the most pathetic cow on this site. She's an impovershed flaming nutbag who clearly hates her life. And takes that hatred out on anyone that crosses her path. She a deep festering pit of untreated mental illness dressed up as some make believe ala cart do it yourself judaism that makes the scientologists seem sane. She can't even form a cult properly because shes a complete insane and combative nutbag. Every problem in her life is exclusively of her own making. But shes too fucking arrogant and narcissistic to ever examine that.

The end point for Mel will be living out of her broken down car with 6 or 7 kids. Assuming that isn't where she is already.

 

[talk talk talk]

I'm not very experienced with the 4th Circuit, but isn't that holding limited to fee-shifting in FLSA cases? I don't remember what statute Hardin and Null are using for an exception to the American rule.

Lodestar is used for all types of fee awards, not just FLSA.

 

[northstar747]

Practice what your preach because you use this site to be up in everyone else's business and life but your own.

so i dont really read your thread or follow it.

I m gonna ask you a question in good faith.

Why not just stop. just delete your account dont post anything on your social media and people will having to talk about regarding you.

The problem for Josh is this.

back in like 2016 he took the farms down. Who ever was harassing him "won" but rather than taking that win, they saw they could bully him. So rather than just stopping there they demanded the sits database in order to dox its users so the site came back.

There was a website called "stream.me" josh streamed there but again someone found out who the owners of the streaming site were and threatened their children if josh was allowed to stream there. So they caved. What did this do?

It told every other crazy "hey if we threaten these people we can get what we want" and so the owners of stream.me had to close down.

Alright so the place has to come from is this "if he gives in an closes your thread it will signal to everyone he can be bullied this way, so he has to fight back"

I have seen josh offer to help chirs chan "a mother fucker" he offered to help coach red pill, he offered to help Byu (who faked his death).

Stop suing him and try to work out something.

 

[RodgerDodger]

so i dont really read your thread or follow it.

I m gonna ask you a question in good faith.

Why not just stop. just delete your account dont post anything on your social media and people will having to talk about regarding you.

The problem for Josh is this.

back in like 2016 he took the farms down. Who ever was harassing him "won" but rather than taking that win, they saw they could bully him. So rather than just stopping there they demanded the sits database in order to dox its users so the site came back.

There was a website called "stream.me" josh streamed there but again someone found out who the owners of the streaming site were and threatened their children if josh was allowed to stream there. So they caved. What did this do?

It told every other crazy "hey if we threaten these people we can get what we want" and so the owners of stream.me had to close down.

Alright so the place has to come from is this "if he gives in an closes your thread it will signal to everyone he can be bullied this way, so he has to fight back"

I have seen josh offer to help chirs chan "a mother fucker" he offered to help coach red pill, he offered to help Byu (who faked his death).

Stop suing him and try to work out something.

The reason this site even knows about Mel is we discovered her abusive and insane ex husband was stalking her. And tried to warn her. Only to discover she was even more abusive and crazy than he is. As they say no good deed goes unpunished.

 

[obsdj]

Why not just stop.

She has already answered this. Have a seat, she's about to call you a "pacifist."

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Why not just stop. just delete your account dont post anything on your social media and people will having to talk about regarding you.

This concept is wrong. Victims of Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying, and Cyberharassment do not need to retreat and hide in the shadows.

This approach you promote of a victim hiding in the shadows is a narcissistic abuse tactic called "isolation". That's like telling someone "don't go hiking so you won't get murdered on a trail or else it's your fault for hiking". It's a form of victim blaming.

Participating in the internet and society are common leisure activities. Everyone has a right to participate in society and leisure activities without the threat of Stalking or Harassment. The principle is even recognized in the law somewhat as the torts of "loss of society", "loss of consortium" and "loss of enjoyment of life".

Isolating a person is a form of abuse.

If you're so positive you're in the right, how are you 0 for 6?

Read the Judge's opinion of August 30, 2021. It's 0-3.

Did you read the dismissals or you're just asking me because you're another herd mentality Sheeple watching Rekeita's misinformation campaign?

My first case was dismissed because some of my facts were written to vague. My second case was dismissed because I didn't add a paragraph why Joshua Moon wasn't immune under Section CDA 230.

My 3rd case was dismissed because the Judge was asleep behind the wheel

God sure must hate you to be handing your loss after loss.

The Creator has nothing to do with secular judges

Yes, I agree it shouldn't be. But I don't believe it was overturned?

I agree, it likely isn't actionable.


You shouldn't lie, Mel.


You haven't shown it once, let alone twice.


Yes, do take the advice of a women who lost every single case against us. She sure knows what she's doing. Totally.


16 minute video to debunk two hour long segment. That's gonna be real good. Totally. No sarcasm here.

>"About my wife"

Weren't you two divorced? Didn't you celebrate and count the days you could leave him? I guess all it takes is a little sex and saying "nick bad" and you're in love again.

40 seconds in, and he is already going "Ree judge bias! Mean! Bias! Bad! No give wife what want!"

6 minutes in and he hasn't gotten to Nick stuff. He is still covering the summary of the case. Flawed summary.

More than 7 minutes in (nearly halfway into the video) he finally starts the Nick stuff.

The super smart man doesn't know how to pause videos before speaking. Nor does he know how to skip to the relevant parts.

Brilliant Legal Genius Marshall shows he doesn't know how appeal process works, or indeed even the bond process. By his logic Melinda's appeal has no merit because she appealed after dismissal. Well, I suppose her appeal does have no merit, but he's legal theory is not sound.

10 minutes in, he still hasn't addressed a single point Nick made, only once addressing then name of the document. I think I can stop here. Somehow I don't think he'll manage anything legally coherent. Hasn't so far.




Where did I say that? You should learn to read, Mel. Also, that's ironic coming from a women who believes all non-jews should die (including blacks). Hypocrisy much?

Isolating it to the second prong or only to the call?

Do you have the required license? Also, it only applies to animals, and if on your property only ones about to kill you.

I literally cited you a fourth circuit court of appeals caselaw. But, hey, please cite any caselaw that says you can't get attorney's fees if your fees were paid by third party. You can't, because there is no such caselaw. Everytime people made the argument you made, they failed to provide caselaw because there is none.

You just can't stop gaslighting. Ridiculous.

You're desperate to stop people from knowing their rights. Typical Masonic lawyer.

Oh ffs surely not even you are that stupid. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with setting fucking man-traps, which you outright state is your intention. If your 'bear trap' actually harmed a human, one quote of your postings here would strip you of any least 'benefit of the doubt' protection and you'd be down for malicious wounding at the very least.

GodBEAR you are absolutely deluded beyond reason, woman.

Virginia law requires labels next to the traps to prevent humans from being injured. But VA law also says don't trespass on other's land, so its considered your fault if you end up in a properly labeled animal trap while trespassing.

My bear traps are the least of your worries though. I have 2 pit bulls who don't take kindly to Stalkers.

 

[Spergichu]

This concept is wrong. Victims of Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying, and Cyberharassment do not need to retreat and hide in the shadows.

This approach you promote of a victim hiding in the shadows is a narcissistic abuse tactic called "isolation". That's like telling someone "don't go hiking so you won't get murdered on a trail or else it's your fault for hiking". It's a form of victim blaming.

Participating in the internet and society are common leisure activities. Everyone has a right to participate in society and leisure activities without the threat of Stalking or Harassment. The principle is even recognized in the law somewhat as the torts of "loss of society", "loss of consortium" and "loss of enjoyment of life".

Isolating a person is a form of abuse.






Read the Judge's opinion of August 30, 2021. It's 0-3.

Did you read the dismissals or you're just asking me because you're another herd mentality Sheeple watching Rekeita's misinformation campaign?

My first case was dismissed because some of my facts were written to vague. My second case was dismissed because I didn't add a paragraph why Joshua Moon wasn't immune under Section CDA 230.

My 3rd case was dismissed because the Judge was asleep behind the wheel



The Creator has nothing to do with secular judges







You just can't stop gaslighting. Ridiculous.

You're desperate to stop people from knowing their rights. Typical Masonic lawyer.






Virginia law requires labels next to the traps to prevent humans from being injured. But VA law also says don't trespass on other's land, so its considered your fault if you end up in a properly labeled animal trap while trespassing.

My bear traps are the least of your worries though. I have 2 pit bulls who don't take kindly to Stalkers.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

This concept is wrong. Victims of Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying, and Cyberharassment do not need to retreat and hide in the shadows.

You aren't a victim. A victim of cyber bullying would be someone who is repeatedly targeted by a group on various social media platforms, regardless of whether they're even posting or not. The difference between you and cyberbullying victims is that we only talk when you talk back. You feed into it. Victims don't feed into the very source that's harassing them, only idiots do. You can argue against this as much as you like but I quite frankly believe that people who can't get off the internet while being bullied fuckin deserves it because they're a retard and pussy.

Participating in the internet and society are common leisure activities. Everyone has a right to participate in society and leisure activities without the threat of Stalking or Harassment. The principle is even recognized in the law somewhat as the torts of "loss of society", "loss of consortium" and "loss of enjoyment of life".

Isolating a person is a form of abuse.

You don't have to isolate yourself. The outdoors exists. For someone who claims to has a very active social life, you do seem to often act like the internet is your only venue for communication.

 

[Space Cooter]

God marshal is a zero. But I guess when you have 6 fetal alcohol kids from 6 different fathers you can't be choosy.

 

[Dyn]

God marshal is a zero. But I guess when you have 6 fetal alcohol kids from 6 different fathers you can't be choosy.

Yes you can you literally already have six to choose from.