US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Gehenna]

Huh? I don't think she's stepping down, personally - would like to hear at the very least more media figures saying "sources told me..." before getting my hopes up - but I interpreted Bartiromo's source's claims as meaning both of those things. "I'll resign after BBB passes" is just a different saying of "Hey, if you pass BBB through Congress, I'll go". Unless I missed something or phrased myself wrong, idk.

She's been saying she plans to leave in the 2022 midterms for a while, what is being said there is she plans to 'cut and run', if it passes she just -leaves-. Right then and there instead of waiting.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Article: https://longisland.news12.com/biden-team-asks-supreme-court-to-pause-texas-abortion-law
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2021101...sks-supreme-court-to-pause-texas-abortion-law
---------------------------------------------------
Biden team asks Supreme Court to pause Texas abortion law

The Biden administration is asking the Supreme Court to block the Texas law banning most abortions, while the fight over the measure's constitutionality plays out in the courts.

The law has been in effect since September, aside from a district court-ordered pause that lasted just 48 hours, and bans abortions once cardiac activity is detected, usually around six weeks and before some women know they are pregnant.

The Justice Department asked the high court Monday to lift an order imposed by a conservative federal appeals court that has allowed Texas to continue enforcing the nation's strictest curbs on abortion through a novel law that was written to make it hard to challenge in the federal court system. The department had announced its intentions last Friday.

The Texas law defies the Supreme Court's major decisions on abortion rights “by banning abortion long before viability -- indeed, before many women even realize they are pregnant,” the Justice Department wrote in its plea to the court.

“The question now is whether Texas’ nullification of this Court’s precedents should be allowed to continue while the courts consider the United States’ suit. As the district court recognized, it should not,” the Justice Department wrote.

The administration also raised the prospect that the court could decide to grant full review to the Texas law and rule on its constitutionality this term, even though lower courts have yet to do so. The Supreme Court rarely steps in this early in a lawsuit.

The Texas law and the possibility that other states could adopt similar measures justify the court's early involvement, the administration said.

The high court ordered Texas to respond by midday Thursday.

It's not clear whether the administration will prevail at a Supreme Court with a conservative majority that has been fortified by three appointees of former President Donald Trump and already has agreed to hear a major challenge to abortion rights in a case from Mississippi.

The Trump appointees, joined by two other conservatives, have once before rejected a plea to keep the law on hold, in a separate lawsuit filed by abortion providers. There was no immediate timetable for Supreme Court action on this latest motion.

While courts have blocked other state laws effectively banning abortion before a fetus can survive outside the womb, roughly around 24 weeks, the Texas law has so far avoided a similar fate because of its unique structure that leaves enforcement up to private citizens, rather than state officials. Anyone who brings a successful lawsuit against an abortion provider for violating the law is entitled to claim at least $10,000 in damages.

In the 5-4 vote last month to allow the law to remain in effect, the high court acknowledged in an unsigned order that there were “serious questions regarding the constitutionality of the Texas law” but also “complex and novel” procedural questions about whom to sue and whether federal courts had the power to stop the law from being enforced.

In a dissenting opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that he would have put the “unprecedented” law on hold so that court could consider “whether a state can avoid responsibility for its laws” by handing off enforcement. The court’s three liberal justices also dissented.

The question now is whether the administration’s presence in the new lawsuit will make a difference. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals provided its answer late Thursday, extending its earlier order that allows the law to remain in effect. In a 2-1 vote, the court said it was siding with Texas for the same reasons the Supreme Court and a different 5th Circuit panel cited in the providers’ lawsuit — questioning whether anyone could march into federal court to challenge the law.

Texas sought help from the appeals court after U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled that the Justice Department did have the ability to sue and that he had the authority to stop the law from being enforced, writing that “women have been unlawfully prevented from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the Constitution.”

The judge conceded, however, that “other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion.”
---------------------------------------------------

>I'm gonna enact this unconstitutional eviction moratorium while the Supreme Court isn't looking huehuehuehue
>SUPREME COURT PLS HELP

 

[HTTP Error 404]

So are we going to call it the Colin Powell Award when some vax faggot gets the coof and dies?

See how long that subreddit lasts.

Reddit - Dive into anything

www.reddit.com

9 hours as of this writing. I imagine they're getting incredible amounts of hate-spam from the usual suspects.

 

[Snekposter]

Machiavelli shat on mercenaries for a reason.

He was probably just ass-mad that the Swiss kept their word. Want to know how and why the Swiss Guard became a thing? Because the Swiss mercs the Pope had hired died to the last man to help him escape during the Sack of Rome. They took his coin, and they were his men. Good luck expecting loyalty like that from an Italian... Yes, he died right after the Sack and no doubt the event itself was no major influence, but unlike the Italian mercs the Northern ones tended to be reliable.

 

[Milwaukee Macho Man]

9 hours as of this writing. I imagine they're getting incredible amounts of hate-spam from the usual suspects.

First thing I saw was someone "I like this subreddit not because I'm happy people are dying but because other ones are."

WTF? Reddit is so fucking pozzed it hurts.

 

[tehpope]

Is the U.S. Already in Recession?

Hello. Today we look at the risk of a U.S. recession, what’s coming up in the world economy this week and the rise of the super rich.

www.bloomberg.com

 

[pwnest injun]

Here's a lukewarm thought. What if Taiwan offers employment with the option of citizenship to any US soldier who subject to dismissal over the CoV vaccine? Suddenly their military gets a massive injection of tried and tested veteran soldiers, mechanics etc.

 

[LaxerBRO]

The UN couldn't handle a bunch of black people with machetes.

UN troops in America should be eradicated as a public health measure. Amazingly, they turned Hati into more of a shithole:

Haiti was cholera-free until October 2010, when infected sewage from United Nations peacekeepers sent to the Caribbean nation after a devastating earthquake contaminated a river.

Since then about 10,000 Haitians have died of the disease, which can cause profuse diarrhoea and fluid loss that can kill within hours. More than 800,000 have fallen ill.

A U.N.-appointed panel concluded in 2011 that fecal contamination by a U.N. peacekeepers' camp was a likely cause of the epidemic, but said "it was not the fault of, or deliberate action of, a group or individual."

 

[ShortBusDriver]

Well calling the leader a racist did not work so I guess this is the next logical step. These morons are going to see an insurrection* if they keep pushing this shit.

*Not endorsing or encouraging just pointing out the inevitable consequence of tyranny, Glowies.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/the-forgotten-city-hall-riot.html

Back in the 1990s the NYPD went on a drunken rampage at NYC hall.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Article: https://longisland.news12.com/biden-team-asks-supreme-court-to-pause-texas-abortion-law
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2021101...sks-supreme-court-to-pause-texas-abortion-law
---------------------------------------------------
Biden team asks Supreme Court to pause Texas abortion law

The Biden administration is asking the Supreme Court to block the Texas law banning most abortions, while the fight over the measure's constitutionality plays out in the courts.

The law has been in effect since September, aside from a district court-ordered pause that lasted just 48 hours, and bans abortions once cardiac activity is detected, usually around six weeks and before some women know they are pregnant.

The Justice Department asked the high court Monday to lift an order imposed by a conservative federal appeals court that has allowed Texas to continue enforcing the nation's strictest curbs on abortion through a novel law that was written to make it hard to challenge in the federal court system. The department had announced its intentions last Friday.

The Texas law defies the Supreme Court's major decisions on abortion rights “by banning abortion long before viability -- indeed, before many women even realize they are pregnant,” the Justice Department wrote in its plea to the court.

“The question now is whether Texas’ nullification of this Court’s precedents should be allowed to continue while the courts consider the United States’ suit. As the district court recognized, it should not,” the Justice Department wrote.

The administration also raised the prospect that the court could decide to grant full review to the Texas law and rule on its constitutionality this term, even though lower courts have yet to do so. The Supreme Court rarely steps in this early in a lawsuit.

The Texas law and the possibility that other states could adopt similar measures justify the court's early involvement, the administration said.

The high court ordered Texas to respond by midday Thursday.

It's not clear whether the administration will prevail at a Supreme Court with a conservative majority that has been fortified by three appointees of former President Donald Trump and already has agreed to hear a major challenge to abortion rights in a case from Mississippi.

The Trump appointees, joined by two other conservatives, have once before rejected a plea to keep the law on hold, in a separate lawsuit filed by abortion providers. There was no immediate timetable for Supreme Court action on this latest motion.

While courts have blocked other state laws effectively banning abortion before a fetus can survive outside the womb, roughly around 24 weeks, the Texas law has so far avoided a similar fate because of its unique structure that leaves enforcement up to private citizens, rather than state officials. Anyone who brings a successful lawsuit against an abortion provider for violating the law is entitled to claim at least $10,000 in damages.

In the 5-4 vote last month to allow the law to remain in effect, the high court acknowledged in an unsigned order that there were “serious questions regarding the constitutionality of the Texas law” but also “complex and novel” procedural questions about whom to sue and whether federal courts had the power to stop the law from being enforced.

In a dissenting opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that he would have put the “unprecedented” law on hold so that court could consider “whether a state can avoid responsibility for its laws” by handing off enforcement. The court’s three liberal justices also dissented.

The question now is whether the administration’s presence in the new lawsuit will make a difference. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals provided its answer late Thursday, extending its earlier order that allows the law to remain in effect. In a 2-1 vote, the court said it was siding with Texas for the same reasons the Supreme Court and a different 5th Circuit panel cited in the providers’ lawsuit — questioning whether anyone could march into federal court to challenge the law.

Texas sought help from the appeals court after U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled that the Justice Department did have the ability to sue and that he had the authority to stop the law from being enforced, writing that “women have been unlawfully prevented from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the Constitution.”

The judge conceded, however, that “other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion.”
---------------------------------------------------

4th time they've went to the SCOTUS to beg them to stop the Texas Law, btw. Didn't hear about what happened to the 3rd, but the first 2 they told them to pound sand because they were bypassing the legal process.

The "heartbeat" framing is a killshot for Abortion support, btw. Incredible persuasion, even before 4k ultrasounds and the like come into play. Remember, the compromise was "rare" and the vapid whores violated it. This was always coming to a head sooner or later.

 

[verissimus]

Jesus this whole thread is fucking depressing. Luckily there's an easy solution just print more money that'll fix it.

You can't eat money though you can use it as fuel.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

You can't eat money though you can use it as fuel.

Not even that so much these days. They just add zeroes on a computer somewhere.

 

[Gar For Archer]

UN troops in America should be eradicated as a public health measure. Amazingly, they turned Hati into more of a shithole:

Didn’t expect the “shithole” thing to be quite so literal when I clicked that spoiler.

 

[CarlosDanger]

A little quick primer on why the UN coming in would be bad:

Military bases in US. The big ones, not the National Guard, Reserve, or tiny battalion level ones.
View attachment 2637348

Now for why:
View attachment 2637349
View attachment 2637350
And finally:

Spoiler: Our Secret Weapon

View attachment 2637351
HAH! Gotcha!

As someone who wears shorts in the winter, this is accurate.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

If you been following the Supply Chain Crisis megathread, it's an inability to ship stuff, rather than a real lack.

Your place probably wasn't affected yet.

This. In my area we're running low on Diet Pepsi 2L in stores, and all the Pepsi is gone from the shelves (just one example). No one talks about panic but you can tell when you walk in the stores there's a heavy panic mode setting in on most people.

 

[Michael Wade]

The only hope the UN would have is surprise, speed and a complete and total communications blackout. I seriously fear the establishment using the total destruction of the internet to corral and control portions of the USA. It wouldn't get far after a time, but it would be a terrible first month.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

n my area we're running low on Diet Pepsi 2L in stores

Fatties on suicide watch

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

This. In my area we're running low on Diet Pepsi 2L in stores, and all the Pepsi is gone from the shelves (just one example). No one talks about panic but you can tell when you walk in the stores there's a heavy panic mode setting in on most people.

I’ve noticed this too. No shortages of anything major, and if one grocery store is out then another one has it, but folks are stocking up bigly around here and they’re on edge.

 

[DejaThoris]

Didn't the UN troops in Srebrenica also hide from the Bosnian Serbs in a house while the VRS and Scorpions basically rolled in, massacred nearly all the men and boys in town and raped the women?

I vaguely remember something about how some European UN soldiers were "protecting" a large crowd of women in, I think, Bosnia.

Serb(?) soldiers came in and started selecting all the pretty girls they wanted to rape and the Euro UN fags just let the Serbs grab the girls and drag them away to be gang raped without doing anything to stop them.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

I’ve noticed this too. No shortages of anything major, and if one grocery store is out then another one has it, but folks are stocking up bigly around here and they’re on edge.

Here, people act like someone set their pants on fire or poured spiders down their shirt top and let them roam the store aisles.