Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Is there any consequences she could face by lying that someone held him up at knife point, or that she really did make the bar association comment?
The only consequences she could face is sanctions for a spam of clearly irrelevant and frivolous motions.
Don't think it's relevant - how would claiming that he was a victim of a crime help her case?
Nothing she says is relevant.
Oh sure, it's fun here, I just didn't think it was great to include in a legal filing.
I don't think the court is gonna be all that bothered by that reference.
 
1634597610094.png
Isn't this an admission she sues for the same thing, something she should not be doing and claims to not be doing?
 
View attachment 2637613
Isn't this an admission she sues for the same thing, something she should not be doing and claims to not be doing?
Not necessarily. You are allowed to bring the same claim rising out of a different facts. That is to say if I defamed you in 2010 and the court found it to be not defamatory, and I made new and materially different defamation towards you years later, you would still likely have a possible claim. That being said, everything before 2018 is barred by statute of limitations. See, in more details, here
 
Is there any consequences she could face by lying that someone held him up at knife point, or that she really did make the bar association comment?
It's completely irrelevant. There is far more stuff in this filing to drop the judicial hammer on her for than that. She is insanely going after the Judges and Hardin again. Mel had best hope that her motion for a hearing is denied. Because if she physically appears before the Judge, any Judge reading this, she'll leave in handcuffs.

Hardin is in a tough place. It's normally bad form to beat up on a pro se litigant and seek sanctions. But Mel is truly extra special.

If Hardin does wish to make a point he could probably seek a protective order regarding Josh, his family and Hardin himself. Between the crazy threats in this thread to the whole bit about someone stabbing Null, not to mention her referencing what I can only assume are Virginia's Colonial Era Dueling Code I would think he could make a case regarding the direction the escalating crazy is heading..

Edit; just skimming through this, it's not a pleading. It's a manifesto.
 
If Hardin does wish to make a point he could probably seek a protective order regarding Josh, his family and Hardin himself. Between the crazy threats in this thread to the whole bit about someone stabbing Null, not to mention her referencing what I can only assume are Virginia's Colonial Era Dueling Code I would think he could make a case regarding the direction the escalating crazy is heading..
I don't know that such a request would be granted, although it would be fun if Hardin asked and the court agreed.
 
At least change the song list up a bit, Melly.
She should go back to her pirate RP posts, I'm pretty sure those are her only comments that I've read from start to finish.

Either that or she should post dog pictures. Preferably after dressing them in little pirate hats and working them in as characters to her pirate RP.

Post dog pics, Mel.

EDIT: I totally missed the new court happenings, sorry for derailing
 
Last edited:
By showing the lengths people will go to harm Null because of his site? I dunno, I just saw her reeeeeeeing about Hardin lying while she was lying herself and hoped it could be used to nail her.
If they will stomp on her for any lies, it will be the repeated and ongoing questionable claims about her prior lawsuits. Which are part of the record and can be easily proven.

@Null please ask Mr. Hardin to post the letters he gets from Virginia State Bar about .elinda's complaints. They should be wildly entertaining.
 
What I find most interesting, is that she is not only lying about her posts, she is lying about easily verifiable lawsuits she made. She claims, for example, that she has not sued "judges and clerks". But she has. See Scott v. Lyall
Screenshot 2021-10-19 021613.png
Screenshot 2021-10-19 021626.png
Screenshot 2021-10-19 022610.png
Screenshot 2021-10-19 022635.png

She claims she has not disobeyed court orders ever before, but she has. For example, by constantly relitigating her issues, or failing to pay sanctions. She keeps on making such easily verifiable lies over and over again.

Why does she lie about facts the judge can fact check in minutes?

Maybe the only valid point she made is that Hardin claimed Andrew was her boyfriend at one point, although this is still hardly relevant.

Mel: "NULL IS LYING ABOUT THIS WEBSITE BEING LEGAL. Okay, so sofar no criminal complaints were issued, or won against the site, but it is tottally illegal! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

Lol, okay, Mel.
 
Last edited:
Hardin will reply, of course. In before he does, or after, the court can kindly, or not, tell Mel to fuck off. All this did was prove Hardin's point that Mel needs to be sanctioned.
How long will these replying-to-replies-to-replies reindeer games continue, do you think, before the court puts a stop to it?
 
I never thought I could see anyone outdo Russell Greer in insane legal documents..but today I can say I have.
@Useful_Mistake How would you rate Mel's manifesto from 1 good to 10 too wacko for anyone.
10, only so far as I have never seen anyone outright lie to the judge so much about the facts the judge himself knows to be true. She is literally denying all reality.
How long will these replying-to-replies-to-replies reindeer games continue, do you think, before the court puts a stop to it?
Soon, I wager. Most (important) motions are already replied by both parties, so I figure the judge will make

Kiwi's can you fact check me? Mel claims that Hardin quotes Rayfield v. Lawrence but she doesn't show where, and I can't find it anywhere. I assume it's another lie. Found it. She's still wrong about the case. She reads "all virginia cases" as "all cases in 4th circuit" for some weird absurd reason. That is her entire basis for why Hardin's citation is wrong. It's wrong because she can't read
 
Melinda seemed have had some damn fine cocaine when she wrote up that bit of insanity.
Well what else would she spend her stimulus checks on? It's not like her kids give anything back to her, why should she give them anything? They haven't paid back for their 5 years of breastfeeding.
 
Back