Artcow Shaddai Prejean / Shädman / Shadman / Shädbase / Shad / TheShadling - Pedophile Web Artist. Edgelord. Alleged Heroin Addict. Drew Porn of His Mother. Charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Legally a "Menace to Society" in Switzerland. TAKE IT EZ BABE!!!

This is what I'm talking about, though. Someone said he "apologized" for drawing the CP of keems daughter in the first place, and everyone just sort of let it go? I know Keemstar has enough money to fuck with a dude like Shad for doing it, and I know you can mount some kind of civil case for drawing porn of someone's daughter, which definitely would cause some kind of emotional destress to the family. Yet people are letting him post this shit with no push back? Keem STILL talks shit about mundane fucking Matt calling the cops on him or some shit, yet shad's just kinda skating by?
 
That person actually reminds me of someone who has a thread here, I'm curious if it's their new account. I'll look into it after work.
Spazkid told them to deal with their own problems and leave Shad to his friends, Mick dropped in too. Obviously they are a weirdo who didn't listen, or follow through with their own promises.
Screenshot_2021-10-19-12-32-44-1.png
 
This is going to be my new icon when the spooky month ends.
What are some other drugs that shadman is (probably) also taking?
Copium. He's still trying to act like an internet badass, when in reality, he's closer to Bashurverse than his glory days.
This thread brought out most of the faggots, furries and pedophiles out of the woodwork of this site like the termites they are.
You know that mod who came in and said "stop sperging about lolicon? Can he come back and say "stop sperging about the spergs sperging about lolicon"? At this point, you guys are shitting up the thread, too; the debate is over, so can everyone stop complaining about it?
 
View attachment 2640329
Ignoring how braindead the above tweets are, their reply to it is just...nothing. I think the implication is that they are a zoomer, maybe? Like a "I'm one of the good ones" moment.
Imagine having one of your life goals specifically being drawing porn, not even just drawing. Something about that makes me think that this is someone way too young that found out about Shadman in 2016/17 and looks up to him a worrying amount. I'm just not sure whether that's better or worse than this being a full adult that happens to be on spectrum or something.
Also, like @Wild Wild Wisteria said, their online presence is "muh cancel culture" about Marylin Manson and Shad stalking.

Seems like a nobody that wants to be a somebody without doing anything.
Getting real tired of the covert-coomer mentality.
 
the fan theories are worse than the tweets fucking hell
View attachment 2640229
t | a | n
I feel like Chuck during his breakdown in Better Call Saul. He DREW A KID WANKING OFF MICROPHONES! In no world is that "SFW". He's drawn kids with realistic proportions (aside from the heads) and invited other artists to do so as well. These people act like we're parents from the 80's scared that DnD is Satanism, like we're being irrational when we say "drawing porn of kids makes you a paedophile".
 
View attachment 2640329
Ignoring how braindead the above tweets are, their reply to it is just...nothing. I think the implication is that they are a zoomer, maybe? Like a "I'm one of the good ones" moment.
Imagine having one of your life goals specifically being drawing porn, not even just drawing. Something about that makes me think that this is someone way too young that found out about Shadman in 2016/17 and looks up to him a worrying amount. I'm just not sure whether that's better or worse than this being a full adult that happens to be on spectrum or something.
Also, like @Wild Wild Wisteria said, their online presence is "muh cancel culture" about Marylin Manson and Shad stalking.

Seems like a nobody that wants to be a somebody without doing anything.
Imagine one of your life long goals to be drawing porn for virgins on the internet. Rejoice, people who went to college for dumb majors because the bar is officially in hell.
 
You know that mod who came in and said "stop sperging about lolicon? Can he come back and say "stop sperging about the spergs sperging about lolicon"? At this point, you guys are shitting up the thread, too; the debate is over, so can everyone stop complaining about it?
The thing is, if we can't talk about the lolicon or if it's bad, then what even makes him a lolcow anymore? The fact that he is edgy? If he is nothing more than an edgy artist then everyone in this thread is playing into his game, making all of us the spergy lolcows.

We are sitting here like a bunch of faggots all "MAYBE ITS HEROIN!" Or maybe its just an edgy boy who stays popular by making idiots like us run circles on who he actual is?

The fact that lolicon is bad MAKES him a lolcow, without this fact we are just unwitting fanboys keeping his popularity pumping.
 
I feel like Chuck during his breakdown in Better Call Saul. He DREW A KID WANKING OFF MICROPHONES! In no world is that "SFW". He's drawn kids with realistic proportions (aside from the heads) and invited other artists to do so as well. These people act like we're parents from the 80's scared that DnD is Satanism, like we're being irrational when we say "drawing porn of kids makes you a paedophile".
I agree. The picture was just pornography, and I'm pretty sure he could have faced legal issues if the kid's parents wanted to sue. People thinks that "freedom of speech" will protect shad here, but you can make any case in civil court, and I KNOW a case like this would be a slam dunk. It's part of the reason why I'm confused Keem didn't do anything about it when it came to his daughter. Like, I'm no lawyer, but in court I think it would be simple.

1.) Shad said he'd draw porn of Keems daughter.

2.) Shad drew Keems daughter before.

3.) Overlay the pictures of the literal child blowing trump, and the picture of keems daughter Shad drew. They're basically the same.

Anyone smarter than me want to help me lawfag? I feel like, in America, this case would be open and shut.

The thing is, if we can't talk about the lolicon or if it's bad, then what even makes him a lolcow anymore? The fact that he is edgy? If he is nothing more than an edgy artist then everyone in this thread is playing into his game, making all of us the spergy lolcows.
Well, I assume we can still talk about lolicon in relation to shad. I'm still doing it because I'm honestly curious. Likewise, I think we can still talk about how people resort to defending loli in dumb ways. What we can't do is the endless "Loli = bad/loli = good!" or "ZOMG, LOOK AT THE LOLI SPERGING ITS BEEN 30 PAGES!" since it doesn't add to the convo and really just wastes even more pages.

Also, I made this exact comment, too. Shad is linked to loli, so obviously you can't ban the discussion entirely.
 
Something about that makes me think that this is someone way too young that found out about Shadman in 2016/17 and looks up to him a worrying amount.
It's terribly stupid to look up to artists, even more porn artists. It's nice to take inspiration from others or admire one or two qualities they excel at, but looking up to an artist is usually a terribly stupid idea. But i guess the guy is young and impressionable, so he obviously fanboys over Shad.
Keem STILL talks shit about mundane fucking Matt calling the cops on him or some shit, yet shad's just kinda skating by?
I guess Keem could take Shad to court like the agent of Daphne Keen took him over the drawing, but maybe Shad is barely a blip on the radar of Keem. But i think it might be that either Keem is a bit concerned about being taken as a puritan bully for something perfectly reasonable since Shad has a "big fanbase" or he knows that taking him too court would be really time consuming and costly and keeping the pressure on Shad so the fucker keeps the picture off the web.
 
I guess Keem could take Shad to court like the agent of Daphne Keen took him over the drawing, but maybe Shad is barely a blip on the radar of Keem. But i think it might be that either Keem is a bit concerned about being taken as a puritan bully for something perfectly reasonable since Shad has a "big fanbase" or he knows that taking him too court would be really time consuming and costly and keeping the pressure on Shad so the fucker keeps the picture off the web.
I honestly think it's because his daughter would eventually find out why he is in court and suing some dude, and the knowledge would traumatize her.
 
Keem STILL talks shit about mundane fucking Matt calling the cops on him or some shit, yet shad's just kinda skating by?
to be fair it seems like a tough spot for keem. the first time he had collosaliscrazy confront shad for him which is pretty out of character seeing as how confrontational keem is with others. if i were in his situation the last thing i would want is to remind people of that. plus she is old enough to know how to use social media now and see what is being said. it looks like it’s a very uncomfortable situation for him to address, and it’s not appropriate to share it with the type of following he has.
edit ninja’d by @FallOfGrumps
 
did you guys have his facedox yet? since he’s spiraling and a big faggot anyways I don’t feel bad anymore. if you see this shad it wasn’t p***’s fault it was someone else from the bumtumblers 10 years ago. stop being a pedo and gay now. you’re too old for this shit.

View attachment 2635274View attachment 2635275View attachment 2635276



Comparisons of these pictures and Shad's room from livestreams by @JamalActimel:
View attachment 2636283
Haaaahaha oh shit is this how he looks like? his trappy fangirls must be sorely disappointed
 
The thing is, if we can't talk about the lolicon or if it's bad, then what even makes him a lolcow anymore? The fact that he is edgy? If he is nothing more than an edgy artist then everyone in this thread is playing into his game, making all of us the spergy lolcows.[...]
It's not just lolicon, he draws porn of actual real children, he even sends it to their parents to get a reaction. He's straight up risking not just legal action, but permanent social consequences too, hell he had to leave his own country because he's so retarded. And for what? Attention? Grifting? Some short-lived infamy?

He drew porn of his own fucking mother and showed it to her, all while not even hiding his lust for her. Not only that but he's shown himself to be into a massive range of coomer shit and expresses his coomerism in the most autistic ways possible. This faggot's into everything from loli, to incest, to traps and gay shota, to interracial, to just about any mental poison someone with a masturbation addiction could pick up. Sometimes he'll even try to make hilariously bad excuses but they're so weak and low effort that it's a wonder anyone but his cumbrain teenage followers would believe him.

And he's the same kind of perpetually online spergy weirdo as every other cow. He provides endless content that's embarrassing to look at, dresses up like a massive faggot, and gets into internet fights with other retards.

There's plenty of shit to call him out for, including lolicon!, without being a fucking retard that won't stop bickering with other members about tertiary shit and beating a horse deader than your sex life.
 
I honestly think it's because his daughter would eventually find out why he is in court and suing some dude, and the knowledge would traumatize her.

to be fair it seems like a tough spot for keem. the first time he had collosaliscrazy confront shad for him which is pretty out of character seeing as how confrontational keem is with others.
I feel for keem, but I just think his daughter finding actual porn made about her when she was a kid could be more disturbing than finding out about the porn because her dad got the person in court and actually did something about it. Because, as it is now, Keem just kinda let it happen and Shad is still talking about fucking his daughter. He could just create more porn that, again, I think is technically child porn under the law (not in the same way lolicon might be) since he doesn't really have any incentive not to. IDK, maybe I'm just projecting because I'd be the one who'd buttfuck shad in court over something like this. It is a rough spot, though.
 
It's not just lolicon, he draws porn of actual real children
The lolicon thing and the real children thing are directly related. Lolicon is clearly based on real children and these people likely often reference real children to make their porn. Shota is essentially the same thing.

I think we all agree the mom thing is fucked up, there is not much more to talk about regarding that.

I suppose we could talk about inter-racial and futa, but I don't know if those things are actually bad for society. That would just be a conversation of "It's icky," "It's not."

If being online too much and getting into internet fights are the crimes that makes a lolcow, there should be a thread on most of us.
 
I think is technically child porn under the law (not in the same way lolicon might be) since he doesn't really have any incentive not to. IDK, maybe I'm just projecting because I'd be the one who'd buttfuck shad in court over something like this. It is a rough spot, though.
The law on artistic depictions of children is that it can't be drawn to be photo realistic in explicit positions and detail, I'd wager shad's art isn't photo realistic, but is detailed enough and has publicly stated it's Keem's kid. Just enough to give his Lawyer ammunition without stepping on first amendment toes (does Shad have citizenship? no fucking way loli is legal where he is from)
 
The lolicon thing and the real children thing are directly related. Lolicon is clearly based on real children and these people likely often reference real children to make their porn. Shota is essentially the same thing.

I suppose we could talk about inter-racial and futa, but I don't know if those things are actually bad for society. That would just be a conversation of "It's icky," "It's not."

If being online too much and getting into internet fights are the crimes that makes a lolcow, there should be a thread on most of us.
I would say there's a pretty big steppy-weppy between referencing a child and directly replicating the likeness of a child for the purpose of making porn of prolific person's kid just to mock them.
Both are weird, but one is more overtly malignant than the other.
 
Back