Artcow Shaddai Prejean / Shädman / Shadman / Shädbase / Shad / TheShadling - Pedophile Web Artist. Edgelord. Alleged Heroin Addict. Drew Porn of His Mother. Charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Legally a "Menace to Society" in Switzerland. TAKE IT EZ BABE!!!

No way he painted that rifle during his service time, that shit would last about a solid 15 minutes before either a sargeant or a lieutenant would have a severe conniption fit and make him run laps till he'd need to resole his combat boots. The rifle also has no bolt inserted so i'm sure he did that at home.

IIRC Shad said he was stationed with the mobile artillery, and he was the driver or loader of a M109 howitzer. Don't know if that's why he can't aim for shit. During my time with the infantry, not even the most "exceptional" motherfucker was this bad of a shot. When looking at the targets it gets even worse, a 3 means he barely hit it, and that's considering it was a B4 target and not a B10
Randy Stair tier marksmanship
 
(does Shad have citizenship? no fucking way loli is legal where he is from)
He has citizenship. As far as people know, he might have dual citizenship because his dad was probably a niggermutt or a native. Or maybe he overextended his visa and that's why he's staying on Cali. He knows full well there nobody will bother to enforce inmigration
 
I would say there's a pretty big steppy-weppy between referencing a child and directly replicating the likeness of a child for the purpose of making porn of prolific person's kid just to mock them.
Both are weird, but one is more overtly malignant than the other.
I didn't say they were the same, I said they were very clearly related. You people are all exceptional.
 
Out of curiosity...while everyone here is having the eternal lolicon debate: has anyone sifted the autism fest that's his social media presence and tried piecing together a timeline of when Shad may have started using whatever substance he's on?
So far, a friend of mine has been keeping tabs and told me that Shad hasn't posted new stuff in over a year and he begun to schizopost a few weeks back, either throwing random fits or posting stuff he or others made long time ago. It would be hard to put an exact date to when this shit started, but it would be definetly last month, since by the time Chris got arrested for diddling his mother, he made a very lucid post saying that drawing Chris fucking Barb would be too gross and disgusting even for him.

I haven't checked because i avoid the bird website like the plague, but the fact that he hasn't posted new drawings in his website for over a year might be an indicative of something important.
 
Because, as it is now, Keem just kinda let it happen
we don’t know that. for all we know he could’ve been advised not to take it to court. the united states is a grey area country for laws of drawn child pornography and in california (the state shad lives in) it is not considered so
9798EAAB-CEE1-43EA-8C1B-8C719E8FDEFE.jpeg
it is possible that keem talked to an attorney or looked into these laws and decided against taking legal action because he would probably lose.
 
we don’t know that. for all we know he could’ve been advised not to take it to court. the united states is a grey area country for laws of drawn child pornography and in california (the state shad lives in) it is not considered so
View attachment 2640635
it is possible that keem talked to an attorney or looked into these laws and decided against taking legal action because he would probably lose.
Does that include cases where there's a specific child being obviously referenced? "cartoon pornography" is a bit vague, most are non-existent characters, which isn't really the case here.
 
Does that include cases where there's a specific child being obviously referenced? "cartoon pornography" is a bit vague, most are non-existent characters, which isn't really the case here.
Your honor that drawing from my client is not a real child, it is in fact a fictional character and any resemblance is just coincidence.

Yall fuckers know he'd get away with an argument like that in court specially in murica and specially in CA.
 
Your honor that drawing from my client is not a real child and any resemblance is just coincidence.

Yall fuckers know he'd get away with an argument like that in court specially in murica and specially in CA.
Not doable when he openly stated it's his daughter (which he did, iirc)

But true, given this is CA, they'd fine some reasons to let him walk
 
Does that include cases where there's a specific child being obviously referenced? "cartoon pornography" is a bit vague, most are non-existent characters, which isn't really the case here.
it still has a lot of grey areas especially in the state of california. what i’m saying is he would have a very weak case and it wouldn’t be worth taking to court and publicising more.
52CFF2DA-1D7D-4AA7-984D-60997FEED64C.jpegE7F98DDA-3574-4A7C-B572-B2E006AA2051.jpeg
 
Yall fuckers know he'd get away with an argument like that in court specially in murica and specially in CA.
I actually don't believe that. Like, if it were that simple in the case of our 1000 dragon loli, he'd get away with it because he didn't do anything. However, I'm pretty sure you could mount a good case against him when it comes to Keem's daughter. It would be like

"Your Honor, the fact that this drawing LOOKS like keem's daughter is completely cooincidental!"

And the other lawyer would be like

"No, that's Keem's daughter. He drew her before, and if you layer the drawings over each other, they're an exact match, and he said he'd draw his daughter doing this exact sex act here.".'

I'm not saying Shad would automatically catch an L and get 69420 years in jail, but the case wouldn't be as simple as him saying "coincidence, lol" and walking out of court. Maybe.
 
it still has a lot of grey areas especially in the state of california. what i’m saying is he would have a very weak case and it wouldn’t be worth taking to court and publicising more.
Hm I see what you mean, but I'm just wondering if that means non-existent minors, or if that still holds up if it's clearly a real child is being referenced. The way it's worded is very vague
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: horrorfan89
Even his discord's semi forsaken him, between posting memes joking about the possibility he's on heroin are a few well wishers asking what's going on and if he's ok...i mean not on the verge of shooting up enough to blow his heart ok.
 
Back