US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I'd just like to point out that one of those things happened as a result of cities being developed, another happened because of a war that resulted in us being the top manufacturer in the world, and the third turned Jimmy Carter's presidency into an absolute shit show. Guess which one of these three most closely resembles the Biden Administration.
FCEH_KnXsAQFvZr
 
I fail to see the problem here.

I've heard "slammed" and "criticized" but "crushed" is a new one.
I for one cannot wait to read about how

"x REDUCES y over recently article"
or perhaps
"x SHRUNK after disasterous interview"

Clown world being clown world I want more batshit capitalisations that only add to the confusion.

"Ben Shapiro ENTERS Liberal host on live interview"
 
How do you unseat a countries Administration that actively fortified the prior election which strategically positioned them there, who has chosen to side with and support a segment of that society who condemns and wants to unravel all the traditional values that contributed to the building of the greatness of that nation while being reinforced through the unilateral actions of those in academic institutions, the MSM, the Corporate Class, the Higher-Ups in Military and other important government institutions?
You don’t, which is why anyone acting like you can is either delusional or a part of the problem.
 
We got Reagan because of Carter. Because everyone was sick of inflation and hostages but his Administration led to the rise of the neocons and that too is bad.
A bit of a... not really a correction, so much as elucidation. Reagan didn't lead to the start of the neocons. Rather, he was a populist figure who got in term one and became a useful puppet as cognitive issues set in for term 2. The Uniparty was forming before Reagan ever got into office, he was merely the point that said party was able to come out more in the open and make several key gains. Look at Nixon and Ford for the real rise.

You don’t, which is why anyone acting like you can is either delusional or a part of the problem.
Then go suck-start a shotgun if everything is so doomed. You add nothing to the conversation but half-thought doomerism often completely disconnected even from observable reality.
 
I'd just like to point out that one of those things happened as a result of cities being developed, another happened because of a war that resulted in us being the top manufacturer in the world, and the third turned Jimmy Carter's presidency into an absolute shit show. Guess which one of these three most closely resembles the Biden Administration.
1634684724484.png

I call bullshit on the article & agree with your statement.
1.Durring 2016-2020 supply was fine because we had people working .-Trump pushed working to point of low cost gas & having a higher wage working in 9-5 job.
2. the food shortage was hinted at being a comming happening early 2020 because green new deal & being vegin/eating bugs is great guys.
Its on Purpose.
1634685322507.png
 
I am seeing this as well...I am uncertain what to make of it though. Is this a crack in the allegiance to the Administration as they know it is literally spiraling down the toilet, it is difficult for me to extrapolate the significance of this...
What it is, is setting “Blue Team” candidates up to run AGAINST the Biden Admin as well as against the “Red Team”.
 
I'll disagree. Although it seems there's little hope what is lacking in the side that needs to take action is a simple morale boost. Sometimes all it takes for would-be soldiers to rise up against tyranny is merely a simple drummer boy.
You’ll be volunteering your own son to carry that drum, right?
 
Here's the unfortunate thing about the private mandates. They are perfectly constitutional. They do not infringe any right in the constiution.

"But Roe v Wade!" is the actual counter, since hypothetically the decision there should extend here... yes. It would. But SCOTUS is refusing to consider that arguement.


Fucking Democrats, not realizing that they are setting up a decision that will -fuck- them in the long term...
So a company, say Hobby Lobby, could mandate all pregnancies for their employees be carried to term (phrasing is important), and by the same reasoning, that would be legal according to the SCOTUS.

Man, that would be interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back