- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
Obscenity isn't covered by freedom of speech, but nobody's ever tried to make a case against him I don't think.That's one of the issues I have with people who use freedom of speech as a way to excuse the objectively reprehensible shit Shad has done.
I guess you can say that what he's doing is "testing the boundaries of free speech", but everyone knows his true intentions which are at the very least to sedate some sort of twisted perversion of the mind, and at worst, to garner a fanbase of pedophile/pedophile-sympathizers who use his "artwork" as a way to rationalize or even enable their evil desires.
IMHO, Freedom of Speech is important, but is nothing more than a buzzword nowadays for cowards to hide behind when they know what they're doing is wrong.