Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%

  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%

  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%

  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%

  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%
  • Total voters
    2,594
Pee Cola said:
Ofc Russhole may have accidentally suggested that his copyrighted intellectual property is indecent and/or obscene. It still wouldn't affect Null because Section 230, but it'd be the first time in his entire life that Russhole has shown even the tiniest skerrick of self-awareness (albeit subconsciously).
Click to expand...
Well, his book is so stupid it's offensive to people with normal intelligence, but I don't think you could call it obscene.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Clovis, Phil Ken Sebben, Constellationzero and 2 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Russ replies to Null

View attachment 2648393
View attachment 2648395
View attachment 2648396
View attachment 2648397
View attachment 2648398
View attachment 2648399
View attachment 2648400

Edit: lol
View attachment 2648417
Click to expand...


Ahhh Russ. He comes in, and has an ACTUAL decent shot at getting the motion struck due to it being filed late, but he can't stop there, no, he spends what...3....4? of the 7 pages trying to make the "Defendant says I'm relitigating, but ACKSHULLY, the Defendants are the ones relitigating!"

If he really wanted to sink whatever chance at getting Null's response thrown out by pulling the "I know you are but what am I" card, he could've save a lot of trouble, time, and effort, if he simply stating "In response to Defendants statement that Plaintiff is relitigating, here is my reply:" And xeroxed this underneath.

No U.png


With respect of course
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, Clovis, Phil Ken Sebben and 15 others
But di
DONGS.EXE said:
Ahhh Russ. He comes in, and has an ACTUAL decent shot at getting the motion struck due to it being filed late, but he can't stop there, no, he spends what...3....4? of the 7 pages trying to make the "Defendant says I'm relitigating, but ACKSHULLY, the Defendants are the ones relitigating!"

If he really wanted to sink whatever chance at getting Null's response thrown out by pulling the "I know you are but what am I" card, he could've save a lot of trouble, time, and effort, if he simply stating "In response to Defendants statement that Plaintiff is relitigating, here is my reply:" And xeroxed this underneath.

View attachment 2649629

With respect of course
Click to expand...

For the legal spergs like @AnOminous , dosen't the fact that Skordas filed 'late' in response to a motion on a ruling to a case that was struck down already by this court make this moot?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Iron Hamster, Constellationzero and Pee Cola
The Un-Clit said:
But di


For the legal spergs like @AnOminous , dosen't the fact that Skordas filed 'late' in response to a motion on a ruling to a case that was struck down already by this court make this moot?
Click to expand...
Skimming what I can find... this is a really exceptional situation, I was trying to find ANY case-law concerning this type of motion and an expectation of actually responding in a timely manner. Thing is, as a Canuck Google doesn't really send me the best results for American law, let alone a specific state, even if I feed it some solid terms to limit the scope. I also lack the knowledge to quickly find the correct cases. From what I can find, it's very much up to the judge. While properly the time limit should apply, as the law is the law, this is a nonsensical filing and the response was a formality as well as a jab at his wallet, not to mention Null and and Skordas probably assumed this was done and over with.

If a legal kiwi could find any case law on this for the very specific case of replying to an 59(e) late being tolerable due to the exceptional nature of such a filing, I am going to go with the rule that the law is the law and you should file on time. Skordas is, in fact, in the wrong here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cuddle striker, Clovis, Constellationzero and 5 others
AngryTreeRat said:
Skimming what I can find... this is a really exceptional situation, I was trying to find ANY case-law concerning this type of motion and an expectation of actually responding in a timely manner. Thing is, as a Canuck Google doesn't really send me the best results for American law, let alone a specific state, even if I feed it some solid terms to limit the scope. I also lack the knowledge to quickly find the correct cases. From what I can find, it's very much up to the judge. While properly the time limit should apply, as the law is the law, this is a nonsensical filing and the response was a formality as well as a jab at his wallet, not to mention Null and and Skordas probably assumed this was done and over with.

If a legal kiwi could find any case law on this for the very specific case of replying to an 59(e) late being tolerable due to the exceptional nature of such a filing, I am going to go with the rule that the law is the law and you should file on time. Skordas is, in fact, in the wrong here.
Click to expand...
It's a fun academic question, but in reality, it's just an excuse Russ will use to self-soothe when he fails again. If the judge exercises her discretion and accepts the filing, then she was clearly incompetent. And if she doesn't? Well. The dang bias judge should have taken the fact that they filed one document late as proof that they didn't care. This means so much to Russ, can't you see? And they don't even care! Aw, c'mon judge. Let him have his way.

The fact of his failure is inevitable either way. It's just which excuse he uses for why he failed that's yet to be seen.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: cuddle striker, Pee Cola, Clovis and 9 others
GargoyleGorl said:
It's a fun academic question, but in reality, it's just an excuse Russ will use to self-soothe when he fails again. If the judge exercises her discretion and accepts the filing, then she was clearly incompetent. And if she doesn't? Well. The dang bias judge should have taken the fact that they filed one document late as proof that they didn't care. This means so much to Russ, can't you see? And they don't even care! Aw, c'mon judge. Let him have his way.

The fact of his failure is inevitable either way. It's just which excuse he uses for why he failed that's yet to be seen.
Click to expand...
Russ should accept that only Kiwi Farms cares about his plights. He is trying to sue the closest thing to friends he will ever have.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: J Truant, The Littlest Shitlord, Moosebonker and 20 others
Damien Thorne said:
Russ should accept that only Kiwi Farms cares about his plights. He is trying to sue the closest thing to friends he will ever have.
Click to expand...

Except none of us actually care about his pliable punim plights. No one here cares about Russhole outside of laughing at his chuckle-fuck failures, gawking at his Pipsqueak antics, and generally partaking in the exquisite Schadenfreude Russ provides us free of charge. If Russhole were to drop dead or disappear forever back to his home galaxy, no one would shed a tear or lose a wink of sleep over it. They'd lament the loss of lulz and go find some other clown shoes mongo to laugh at.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: snoot booper, DungeonMaster, TractorGirl and 16 others
The Dude said:
Except none of us actually care about his pliable punim plights. No one here cares about Russhole outside of laughing at his chuckle-fuck failures, gawking at his Pipsqueak antics, and generally partaking in the exquisite Schadenfreude Russ provides us free of charge. If Russhole were to drop dead or disappear forever back to his home galaxy, no one would shed a tear or lose a wink of sleep over it. They'd lament the loss of lulz and go find some other clown shoes mongo to laugh at.
Click to expand...
Honestly!

Look, people here say they don’t wish Russ dead but the fact is that if he was run over by a bus tomorrow the world would be a better place.

There’s nobody’s life wouldn’t be improved if that bus came along, including us who’d have to find something productive to do with that half an hour a day we otherwise spend laughing at him.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: snoot booper, LilShotaBoy, WhaleOilBeefHooked and 21 others
Pip Squeak said:
Honestly!

Look, people here say they don’t wish Russ dead but the fact is that if he was run over by a bus tomorrow the world would be a better place.

There’s nobody’s life wouldn’t be improved if that bus came along, including us who’d have to find something productive to do with that half an hour a day we otherwise spend laughing at him.
Click to expand...
“Respectfully your honour, I’m filing a supplemental brief to my request to reconsider because people on Moon’s site are calling for my death pipsqueak.jpg phone screenshot. Moon’s site is out to kill me and Moon and Skordas support this!

Please lock them up forever, delet Kiwi Farms and make Taylor Swift clean my Grammy awards. Ps: you need to study more law.

Rsquiggle

6”
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: snoot booper, Covfefe, Disgruntled Pupper and 19 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back