Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
She should WANT that thing off at this point. That’s an infection waiting to happen (or happening, who knows). I know that means she will be scarred up and neodickless and then it was all for nothing, but goddamn, quit while you’re only so far behind.
The hole looks good, the dickroll looks bad. Even if it doesn't rot off, I'm worried she's going to sneeze and have it fall down the leg of her pants.

Once it's healed, she can use the crater for a suction cup dildo. Or as a flag belt for parades!
s-l1000[1].jpg
 
I still see it coming off because it looks so monstrously large with regards to her frame.
It's only held together by scar tissue. Men's bodies have ligaments that are needed to support the weight of the penis. Women of course don't. So yeah her sausage roll might fall off sooner or later. TT exculansic explains these things very well in her phalloplasty videos.

It's also obvious that the surgeons are just experimenting. When something goes wrong they are trying to find a solution and HOPING it's going to work but they actually have no idea. And their victims believe them & are optimistic because they are trusting these butchers even tho they already failed once.
 
Last edited:
It's only held together by scar tissue. Men's bodies have ligaments that are needed to support the weight of the penis. Women of course don't. So yeah her sausage roll might fall off sooner or later.
Penises are also made of hollow, spongy tissue with a very thin layer of skin, not the thick skin and fat that covers the rest of the body. Flesh sausages are not only poorly attached, they’re also grossly large and constructed of denser material. Even a pornstar with a 10 inch dong isn’t going to see it droop down and literally deform from its weight into a teardrop shape.
 
It's sad how superficial, ignorant & naive trans people are and how cruel, money hungry genital butchers are using them for their horrible experiments.

A penis is not just a roll of flesh & a vagina not just a tunnel. Muscles, liagments, layers of skin, tissues, glands etc. all these important things are impossible to re-create.

Srs is a big lie. All trans people get are horribly mangled genitals made from different parts of their body. And these parts are flayed and stitched together in the hope that it somehow works like natural genitals do. It's absolutely insane.

Frankenstein is a book, not an instruction manual.
 
Is it just me or does anyone else's brain just gloss these rants over and the text just turns into gibberish?
It's sad how superficial, ignorant & naive trans people are and how cruel, money hungry genital butchers are using them for their horrible experiments.
I don't know, it's been pretty funny most of the time.
 
But she's convinced it's going great
This exchange:
C5066BF6-93EC-4898-849C-24D9434DC915.jpeg
“It would give me a not-in-good-way-butterflies having a phallo with a hole like that” you don’t fucking say
:stress:
silent_insanity_ persists in her delusions
“I believe it’ll all be worth it in the end.”
girl…..
Yeah, that thing’s gonna rot off.
 
It's sad how superficial, ignorant & naive trans people are and how cruel, money hungry genital butchers are using them for their horrible experiments.

A penis is not just a roll of flesh & a vagina not just a tunnel. Muscles, liagments, layers of skin, tissues, glands etc. all these important things are impossible to re-create.

Srs is a big lie. All trans people get are horribly mangled genitals made from different parts of their body. And these parts are flayed and stitched together in the hope that it somehow works like natural genitals do. It's absolutely insane.

Frankenstein is a book, not an instruction manual.
They really seem to have a deep misunderstanding of the human body, not just on a medical level but a philosophical level, if that makes sense. You don't need to have knowledge of the specific anatomy of the penis or the vagina to realize that a superficial surgical approximation of one is nothing like the real thing. You just have to have a pretty basic adult understanding of reality. But they don't even seem to make it to that point.

I really wish I could remember the context better so that I could find it again, but there was something a while back where a guy involved in making advanced prosthetics was taking questions from an audience, and someone asked him if we were almost at the point where prosthetic limbs could be better than the real thing and people might choose to start getting their limbs replaced. And the dude was just gobsmacked. He eventually managed to explain that not only are prosthetics not better, or even close, but we are still not even very good at handling amputations. You could see the vast divide between the professional who is actually out there dealing with amputated limbs and real human bodies, versus the person who gets all his ideas about the human body from cool sci-fi concepts and his own imagination.

But while an out-of-touch and probably autistic moron gets shot down for thinking that science can build you a better limb, that same out-of-touch and probably autistic moron would get rushed into gender-affirming care if he decided that science could give him a perfect vagina.

(Also, while I was trying and failing to find that conversation, I did discover that the question is actually a common one, which shows how out of touch certain parts of the internet are. Here is one version of it, where some smug sci-fi fan starts arguing with an LPN about how the LPN is just not using their imagination enough and that soon prosthetic limbs will be cool and good actually! Note which one of them got the upvotes.)

1.png


2.png
 
Some random new tidbits I dug up on Dr. Daniel Freet, who just came up again recently in @Peaches Demure 's post about the bone-in boner surgery patient. Turns out he's got his full curriculum vitae posted publicly. I attached a copy to this post for everyone's reading pleasure -- he's got a pretty extensive professional history in terms of paper writing and public presentation. Also appears his original specialty is doing grafts for severe burn victims. Given how bad his GRS work has been every time its popped up in this thread, I wonder what his burn vics look like. I also may have found the full name of the ill-tempered urologist that's his sidekick that I've seen redditors bitch about -- it's likely "Dr. Run Wang", referenced on page 10 of his CV.

Here's a selection of titles of GRS/SRS related publications he's done that the medically-inclined Kiwis here might be interested in checking out. Some of these are in the context of treating burn victims -- I'm guessing he's recycling some of those graft techniques in his new, lucrative context. Interestingly, a bunch of his papers are focused on reconstructing severely damaged lower limbs -- you'd think that years of working to heal these kinds of injuries would make him hesitant to inflict them on his mentally-ill patients, but apparently not. The CV also includes a list of med students he's mentored who've gone on to become practicing doctors, so some of those names may be budding baby GRS butchers.

Stewart, C., Greives, M. R., Freet, D. J.; The Cross-Leg Flap: A Single Institution’s
experience. Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting; 2016 September 9-11;
San Antonio, Tx.

Stewart, C., Smith, B., Freet, D. J.; Fluoroscopic Radiation Burn of the Arm Secondary to
Cardiac Procedure Treated with Radial Forearm Flap and Skin Graft: A Case Report.
Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons Annual Meeting; 2016 September 9-11; San Antonio, TX

Freet, D. J., Transgender Surgery: The Basics; Presented at the Department of Surgery
Grand Rounds; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical
School; 2017 August 24; Houston, Tx.

Blackburne, B. D., Freet, D. J.; “Connotative Agency: Communicating Transgender in
Medical Practice”; The Rhetoric of Health and Medicine As/Is: Theories and Concepts for
an Emerging Field. Ed. Meloncon, L., Graham, S., Johnson, J., Lynch, J., Ryan, C. (Accepted
for publication) [This one's a book chapter, not a paper or presentation]
 

Attachments

you'd think that years of working to heal these kinds of injuries would make him hesitant to inflict them on his mentally-ill patients,
Why? He has willing people he can experiment on and get lots of $$$ for it. Trans people are perfect guinea pigs. If the experiment fails then the problem either gives up and/or 41% itself and there are always new idiots on the clinic's doorsteps.

A modern unit 731 wouldn't have to capture some unfortunate chinese people. Just advertise that you can create real genitals and the guinea pigs come running to you waving dollar bills.
 
Why? He has willing people he can experiment on and get lots of $$$ for it. Trans people are perfect guinea pigs. If the experiment fails then the problem either gives up and/or 41% itself and there are always new idiots on the clinic's doorsteps.

A modern unit 731 wouldn't have to capture some unfortunate chinese people. Just advertise that you can create real genitals and the guinea pigs come running to you waving dollar bills.
It's really sick. It's like modern human sacrifice.
 
Some random new tidbits I dug up on Dr. Daniel Freet, who just came up again recently in @Peaches Demure 's post about the bone-in boner surgery patient. Turns out he's got his full curriculum vitae posted publicly. I attached a copy to this post for everyone's reading pleasure -- he's got a pretty extensive professional history in terms of paper writing and public presentation. Also appears his original specialty is doing grafts for severe burn victims. Given how bad his GRS work has been every time its popped up in this thread, I wonder what his burn vics look like. I also may have found the full name of the ill-tempered urologist that's his sidekick that I've seen redditors bitch about -- it's likely "Dr. Run Wang", referenced on page 10 of his CV.

Here's a selection of titles of GRS/SRS related publications he's done that the medically-inclined Kiwis here might be interested in checking out. Some of these are in the context of treating burn victims -- I'm guessing he's recycling some of those graft techniques in his new, lucrative context. Interestingly, a bunch of his papers are focused on reconstructing severely damaged lower limbs -- you'd think that years of working to heal these kinds of injuries would make him hesitant to inflict them on his mentally-ill patients, but apparently not. The CV also includes a list of med students he's mentored who've gone on to become practicing doctors, so some of those names may be budding baby GRS butchers.
are there any result pics of this method?
 
Back