- Joined
- May 5, 2020
What I find interesting is that he's attempting to exploit something in a way that actually lends credibility to the leaked information. I mean, why claim your security is compromised if the info is all bullshit? I find it especially hard to believe that Phil, of all people, would show such concern, in a situation where trolls were just making shit up. It's well established that he gets most riled up by things that are factual, even when he's able to refute them (sort of).I want to really emphasize that there is not a single lawyer, outside of someone like personal injury lawyers, who work without a retainer, unless they work with low/no income clients. The idea that he would get a sudden and unexpected $1500 bill from a lawyer he hired is beyond stupid. That's on top of the fact that a fucking lawyer would have fuck-all to do with "identity theft" that didn't happen.
His lies aren't even believable anymore, especially with the bank information leaks.
The info was legit, but Phil's not doing anything about it, merely putting on an act for his tards, more than likely. He may not like it when more evidence of his lies comes out, but he's still not about to take it seriously, even now that we're at a point where someone is willing to go this far to expose him. If he could do that, we wouldn't be here to begin with. We know the most he does about detractor channels and Twitter profiles is coax his tards into attacking them. He's way too lazy and chicken-shit to go any further.