2021 Virginia State election - Federal Beaurocracy and National Establishment vs. Everyone else.

Email leaked out of Loudon County. Apparently the school board was told directly about the rapes and lied to everyone. Youngkin is demanding resignations.


The teachers union is in full panic mode now. If Youngkin wins there are going to be criminal prosecutions. It's life and death now for these people.
I feel like people are praying we don’t see something like Columbine. In Minecraft.
NOVA's population on it's own isn't the problem in this specific election, it's all the ballot boxes delivered in the dead of night after all the other counties in the state finished counting their votes. This is what "election fortification" is code for. That said, the fact that the democrats only chance to win in VA is by electoral fraud is very telling about their chances in the upcoming mid-terms.
And guess what’s going to happen then.
 
Update indicates that Trump is in fact not coming to Virginia.

xhbct.png


Twitter thread
Archive

Corroborated by Washington Post reporting from yesterday as well wherein it is stated "Trump is not expected to travel to Virginia before Election Day, according to two people familiar with his plans."

For those confused by why a Trump visit would be bad, Youngkin already has the Trump right on his side by opposing CRT racism and gender shit in schools. Youngkin is running as a boring, sensible, moderate Republican and the Dems have nothing to attack him with except to try to link him to Trump and frame him as some kind of radical racist.

The groups of people Youngkin needs to peel off from McAuliffe are moderates and center-left Dems who are repulsed by CRT and school-abuse shit so much that they are willing to vote GOP. These more moderate constituencies tend to be repulsed by Trump, and a visit by Trump would force Youngkin to either disavow Trump and lose some support from the right, or accept his help, and shed people from the middle and left whose votes he needs to win.
 
I've been getting the monthly Pravda. This shit is so over the top I have to share.
Damn, they are scared shitless they are going to lose the state after Biden won it with a 10+ point lead. They have to be getting whiplash at how bad the numbers have tanked.

Watch the streets on election night after 7:00 p.m. if Youngkin pulls this off. NOVA got hit with a ton of violent protests in 2016 when Trump won. Things could easily pop off again.
 
Watch the streets on election night after 7:00 p.m. if Youngkin pulls this off. NOVA got hit with a ton of violent protests in 2016 when Trump won. Things could easily pop off again.
Let them.

Because if that happens, it'll turn even more Virginia normies off the Dem party. Right now, it appears to me that there are a lot of moderate voters in Virginia. Let those people see for themselves what the left actually does when elections don't go their way.

The Dems are already losing the plot over Jan. 6. Most people don't give a shit anymore (and they shouldn't, quite frankly). Let those idiots clutch their pearls while their side is the one that burns shit down.
 
whoops
1635472518740.png

1635472545217.png

1635472593271.png
 
McAuliffe double and triple down, he hired ex-Clinton lawyer Marc Elias.
Authored by Jonathan Turley,

As a long-standing associate of the Clintons, Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe has long ties with the Democratic establishment. That history was placed into sharp relief this week when he made a hefty downpayment on the services of former Clinton counsel Marc Elias.



Elias is a critical figure in the ongoing Durham investigation and has been accused of lying to the media to hide the role of the Clinton campaign in funding the Steele dossier.

His former law partner Michael Sussmann at Perkins Coie was recently indicted by Durham.

Elias has also led efforts to challenge Democratic losses, even as he denounces Republicans for such election challenges.

Elias has been sanctioned in past litigation.

Like Sussmann, Elias has left Perkins Coie. He ironically created a law firm specializing in campaign ethics.

McAuliffe may be preparing to challenge any win by Republican Glenn Youngkin. He has given $53,680 to the Elias Law Group. McAuliffe does not appear disturbed by Elias’ highly controversial career or his possible exposure in the Durham investigation.

I previously described news accounts linking the firm and Elias to the dossier scandal:

Throughout the campaign, the Clinton campaign denied any involvement in the creation of the so-called Steele dossier’s allegations of Trump-Russia connections. However, weeks after the election, journalists discovered that the Clinton campaign hid payments for the dossier made to a research firm, Fusion GPS, as “legal fees” among the $5.6 million paid to the campaign’s law firm. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier. When Vogel tried to report the story, he said, Elias “pushed back vigorously, saying ‘You (or your sources) are wrong.’” Times reporter Maggie Haberman declared, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.”
It was not just reporters who asked the Clinton campaign about its role in the Steele dossier. John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman, was questioned by Congress and denied categorically any contractual agreement with Fusion GPS. Sitting beside him was Elias, who reportedly said nothing to correct the misleading information given to Congress.
The Washington Post also reported that “Elias drew from funds that both the Clinton campaign and the DNC were paying Perkins Coie.”

That makes the choice of counsel astonishing given these allegations from reporters and McAuliffe’s previous assertion that “someone who lies about the little things will lie about the big things too.”

Elias also was the subject of intense criticism after a tweet that some have called inherently racist. Democrats used the recent Georgia election law as a rallying cry for federalizing elections by labelling the law, as described by President Biden, “Jim Crow on steroids.” Biden has been repeatedly called out for demonstrably false statements about the law. Elias argued that Georgia voters could not be expected to be able to read their driver’s licenses correctly — a statement that seemed to refer to minority voters who would be disproportionately impacted by such a requirement.

Elias’ work embodies the inherent hypocrisy of some advocates and some in the media on election challenges. He often solicits contributions to challenge election results while denouncing Republicans for challenging election results.
 
“I really think it’s a result of all the stuff in the news media about there being fraud in the election process last year,” Brown said. “They can come to the same conclusion as we do: that there is no fraud in the process.”
Exactly. When you let people see the process, their fears are allayed. But if you resist, there is only one logical conclusion.

It’s created a sense among some staff members that the observers don’t trust them, he said.
Why should they? Are poll watchers there to "trust" you? Or to watch you?

These people have no idea why checks and balances exist.

whoops
View attachment 2668287
View attachment 2668289
View attachment 2668297
For some reason, the woman who sent the email is ... doubling down?
Untitled-1 - Copy (15).jpg

tweet

Fox News put out a +8 Youngkin poll today, which is insane, but Baris says the movement is there, they just had a bad estimation of who will come out. His Virginia poll is coming out tomorrow.

Untitled-2 - Copy (12).jpg


The actual crosstabs in the Fox poll showed that Youngkin is leading on every issue: economy, COVID, jobs, education. If there's a big swing, it's from parents (dads, in particular).

For context, McAuliffe barely won against Cuccinelli when he was last governor. I don't think he hit 50%, so it was really close.
 
Update indicates that Trump is in fact not coming to Virginia.

View attachment 2667379

Twitter thread
Archive

Corroborated by Washington Post reporting from yesterday as well wherein it is stated "Trump is not expected to travel to Virginia before Election Day, according to two people familiar with his plans."

For those confused by why a Trump visit would be bad, Youngkin already has the Trump right on his side by opposing CRT racism and gender shit in schools. Youngkin is running as a boring, sensible, moderate Republican and the Dems have nothing to attack him with except to try to link him to Trump and frame him as some kind of radical racist.

The groups of people Youngkin needs to peel off from McAuliffe are moderates and center-left Dems who are repulsed by CRT and school-abuse shit so much that they are willing to vote GOP. These more moderate constituencies tend to be repulsed by Trump, and a visit by Trump would force Youngkin to either disavow Trump and lose some support from the right, or accept his help, and shed people from the middle and left whose votes he needs to win.
The Trump curse is real. Youngkin will lose because of this. We’ll get ‘em next time!
 
For context, McAuliffe barely won against Cuccinelli when he was last governor. I don't think he hit 50%, so it was really close.
2013 was 48-45-7 with a strong third party Libertarian candidate who had been polling around 8-12% in the week before the election. McAuliffe spent almost twice as much as Cuccinelli.

In 2017, Northam led in every poll from August on except a handful.

Both the polls and amount of cash being equal right now definitely has the D's sounding scared. They probably need to do some accountability journalism and report on the likelihood that Glenn Youngkin raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.

1635488211584.png
 
2013 was 48-45-7 with a strong third party Libertarian candidate who had been polling around 8-12% in the week before the election. McAuliffe spent almost twice as much as Cuccinelli.

In 2017, Northam led in every poll from August on except a handful.

Both the polls and amount of cash being equal right now definitely has the D's sounding scared. They probably need to do some accountability journalism and report on the likelihood that Glenn Youngkin raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.

View attachment 2668813
True on the third-party spoiler. There's a third-party black woman in this race that may peel off some McAuliffe support, but not that much. Princess Blanding.

It's crazy because they could have easily frozen Youngkin with oppo research, but there have only been tepid ads about the Carlyle Group he worked for buying a business and laying people off. If McA had hammered on the idea that he's a slimy Wall Street guy, it probably would have stuck! But Youngkin has avoided that and comes off as pretty wholesome and earnest, while McA oozes enough slime himself to make up for it.
 
Welp, now we’ve got multiple counts of a male student sexually assaulting other boys at a Loudoun Co middle school.


Hey it isn’t just genderspecials who feel empowered, the gay boys feel empowered too! Err unless this is a transboy, lol, who can even say?
This is the email the school board sent out today about it:
https://twitter.com/chrissyclark_/status/1453830527664934914

FC0LJ7jaIAAcC5d.jpg


"Something out of the ordinary..." Like, hello, we are not playing 20 questions with this.
 
All this conviction from the Dems that there is not one single non-Republican out there who is responding to Youngkin recognizing their concerns who might take this statement from Swalwell as an accusation that they too are racists desperate to say “the n word,” and who will then have to consider that perhaps a whole lot of what the modern Dems put out is similarly untrue. And they’re not considering that when that happens en masse across a voting population, it’s what those in the business call a “game changer.”

At some point people were bound to decide it’s more important to protect their kids than to avoid Republican cooties, guys. We’ve heard it before and it’s boring. You overplayed your hand. We don’t want our kids radicalized to hate their families, their country, and themselves. We don’t want our kids taught that male and female are imaginary and they are required as part of the natural development of a human to begin considering during pre-K if they want to be a boy or a girl or neither. And we do not want our 8-yos taught what porn is, and what blowjobs and rimming are, and the argument that you HAVE to because they’re going to consume it anyway so best that you tell them? So if I am a responsible parent who keeps my child off the internet and away from this, you’re going to erase those efforts and remove their innocence yourselves?

The Republicans don’t care if I agree with them about abortion, they’re fine teaming with me where we agree and leaving me alone to go our own ways where we don’t. The purity tests do not exist there. Meanwhile Dems demand 100% unquestioning support for whatever degenerate nonsense from whichever deranged minority they have scheduled for this morning’s entertainment, or else they state they do not want my vote, period.

So now I switched to Independent. Who did this? You did, Dems. You did this.

I hope that the Republicans begin finding themselves the millions of Dems who are parents and who feel this exact same way, and let them speak this: fellow Dems, don’t let them convince you that you have to sacrifice your kids to own the Repugs. You can work with the Repugs to protect kids, and against them on everything else. They’ll allow it. THEY are now the party of reason, to each their own, and in a true clown world twist I would’ve never seen coming in 2006, they are now the party toward which reality has profound bias. Are they crazy in ways? Sure. Unscientific? Absolutely. But I don’t see them trying to take custody from parents who do not wish to have their children’s genitalia mutilated for the stochastic sexual gratification of adult trannies, nor do I see them standing in front of an image of a city burning to the ground and calling it a peaceful protest.
 
Last edited:
Back