The reality is it's a fake religion that has no historical following and that nobody accepts in Judaism or Christianity.
Not exactly.
There is a work by an author named Hugh Schonfield that traces the history of sects like Messianic Judaism. His book is called "The history of Jewish Christianity: From the 1st Century to the Twentieth Century" (1936)
There are other scholars that fill in the gap from 1936 to 2021.
First time I see you don't capitalize a word that should be capitalized. Usually it's the other way around.
My toddler was wiggling in my lap while I was typing, I let it slide
You aren't at peace now and I don't think you've ever known the meaning. It's patently obvious by the way you act on here as well as how you talk in your filings.
You see what you want to.
You also don't have a right to tell anyone what they feel,
that's a narcissistic trait - telling others what they feel.
You have a Christian mentality of what "inner peace" means. You Christians walk around with fake smiles trying to sugar coat everything, enabling sinners, and acting like Pacifists and think that's peace...when all it is is an avoidance of self.
You're also a HYPOCRITE who comes on a website lashing out at others with ugly words and then you want to lecture on "inner peace"? You can keep your Christian notions of inner peace and shove them up your butt hole.
You belong to the world and your ideas of peace belong to worldly thoughts.
I on the other hand belong to YHWH and I have a shalom that you know nothing about.
"“What I am leaving with you is
shalom — I am giving you my
shalom. I don’t give the way the world gives" (John 14:27)
"SOME Jews reject Yahushua"?? No, all of them do.
This is not factually accurate at all.
There are blood born Jewish people that have left Orthodox Judaism and joined Messianic Judaism or who belong to no sect and just believe that Yahushua is The Messiah.
Do you know the statistical numbers of ethnically Jewish people who are Messianic?
Do your homework before you make claims!
Here, meet Kirt Schneider.
"
Although he was born a halachic Jew to two Jewish parents and had a bar mitzvah, today he defines himself as a Jew who believes in Jesus."
Millions watch him on television and online, he has built an empire from donations, blessed Trump before the election and almost bought a house next to the Western Wall; a 'rabbi' in his own eyes, former wrestler Kirt Schneider leads the movement that Judaism warns against
www.ynetnews.com
All branches of judaism rejects "messianic jews", just as they reject black hebrew israelites. And Israel denies "messianic jews" like you citizenship, because you're not really jews. Can you provide one sourcee where a Judaic scholar from any of the three major branches - reform, orthodox or conservative - accepts your crazy beliefs as being Judaism?
Let's be more accurate here. RABBINICAL Judaism rejects "Messianic Judaism" and the "black Hebrew Israelites" movements.
But Rabbinical Judaism, although it has people in it that are from the 11 lost tribes and the tribe of Judah DOES NOT represent the National of Israel. Rabbinical Judaism is a religion, NOT the entire Nation of Israel.
because you're not really jews
I have never claimed to be a "Jew". I call myself an Israelite because I belong to the
Nation of Israel
And regardless, it doesn't matter if someone is from the tribe of Judah (a "Jew") as far as being part of the Nation of Israel. The Nation of Israel consists of ALL the 12 tribes, including the 11 lost tribes that no one knows the DNA of. Elohim's people are scattered all over the world and they are just white people.
ALL the Nation of Israel (the descendants of those at Mt. Sinai) have a right to the land of Israel. They are black, white, brown, and everything in between.
It's against The Torah for Rabbinical Jews to claim the land of Israel and shut out the 11 other tribes. But at the same time, I am glad there is a place of safety for Jewish people who have historically been the victims of ethnic genocide. I am pro-Israel (the State of Israel)
"And the sojourners who join themselves to
Adonai
to serve him, to love the name of
Adonai,
and to be his workers,
all who keep
Shabbat and do not profane it,
and hold fast to my covenant,
I will bring them to my holy mountain
and make them joyful in my house of prayer;
their burnt offerings and sacrifices
will be accepted on my altar;
for my house will be called
a house of prayer for all peoples.”
Adonai Elohim says,
he who gathers Isra’el’s exiles:
“There are yet others I will gather,
besides those gathered already.”" (Isa. 56:6-
Hardin will know more because he has the experience of working in real life cases
You're assuming I don't have court experience.
I actually had a lawyer one time tell me that a CPS worker coming to your house without a Warrant wasn't a constitutional issue. Seriously. I shit you not. I also have corrected lawyers in front of judges when they mis-cited the law. It happens all the time. Lawyers surprisingly make shit up a lot when they don't have the answers.
Reason is: lawyers don't necessarily know more than pro-se litigants about everything. Lawyers generally study a very specific area of law, and then they kind of grope around when it comes to other areas.
Hardin's experience is in Criminal Law. Hence his errors in this case.
Don't get me wrong. I fully support the existence of lawyers. They are the perfect fit for people who don't have the patience, time, money or educational skills to do it themselves. But for those who have the patience, time, money, or educational skills to do it themselves, there's absolutely no reason they can't prevail as a pro-se litigant. Some people like to cut their own hair because they have the time and patience, other people like the experience of being served in a salon. There' s not one right way. Some people like going to a mechanic for oil changes, others like to do it themselves. Neither way is right or wrong, it's just preference.
You don't have to go to law school to have knowledge of specific areas of the law. You can help yourself. What you need is: TO READ. You can actually obtain knowledge for free by being a dork who sits around and reads legal journals, law books and case law. In fact, that is how Abraham Lincoln eventually became a lawyer: he read the law, he never went to law school.
The other thing you need to do as a pro-se litigant to understand the process is read the Rules of Procedure. All you have to do is buy the manual, it's available for anyone to buy (or obtain it for free online), read it and apply it. It's really not rocket science.
Recipe for success as a pro-se litigant: (1) Know the rules of filing (2) Know how to craft a pleading (3) Understand the specific legal issue you are trying to sue for (4) work on your public speaking skills (5) take a shower, brush your teeth, and dress nice before you go to court
DISCLAIMER: this is not legal advice, just my opinion
There's only one area of law that I think is extra-ordinarily complex and a "beast" to handle: Jurisdiction. Gives me a headache trying to wrap my head around all the rules. Hardest fucking law book I ever read!
Google Scholar is fine for an on-the-go lookup of an individual case. I use it quite a bit myself for that purpose. But Google Scholar is inadequate for serious legal research. You can't Shephardize cases, you can't look up related cases easily, and you don't have access to other helpful materials.
Smelly's poor legal research skills--a combination of her lack of training and her use of inadequate resources--really shows. That can, of course, be remedied, but I doubt she will do that. She hasn't taken other advice given in this thread.
Actually, you're incorrect about not being able to pull case citations and related cases on Scholar.Google.com. There's a link next to each case that says "Cite" that will give you the proper citation and also, "Where cited" which will give you every single case that has mentioned that case.
Good ole Socialists at Google. We can certainly rely on them to put the power back into the hands of the people!
Man too many pages went by before I could point out that self employment taxes are "paid" if you actually make money. And also the amount of credits and refund Melinda gets would outway any form of income she is pretending to make
LIBEL
#TAG-EXHIBIT
